BE WARNED: The Great Awakening sub are zionists from /TheDonald and they censor/ban/delete posts of anyone who goes outside of the Israel narritive. (whatever)

submitted ago by CheeseboogersGhost

https://imgoat.com/uploads/b8619251a1/129128.jpg

I WIN. The Great Awakening sub(greater Israel) banned me for exposing their feminazi Zionist propaganda outlet and their Q-tard psy-op. This sub needs a good takeover. It is cancer just like those they work for. https://imgoat.com/uploads/b8619251a1/129118.jpg

They constantly ping spam me so that they can get offended by my response. We've seen this before, haven't we, Goats?

  1. https://imgoat.com/uploads/b8619251a1/129125.jpg

  2. https://imgoat.com/uploads/b8619251a1/129119.jpg

  3. https://imgoat.com/uploads/b8619251a1/129124.jpg

  4. https://imgoat.com/uploads/b8619251a1/129126.jpg

After a long investigation into the sub and many of its top members I publically name them and feel it my duty to warn others. I've joked around and called some of them jews, and some of them are, but I can guarantee you 100% they are all Zionist feminazi's and anti-white. I have screen caps of their members saying things like this: https://imgoat.com/uploads/b8619251a1/129121.jpg This kind of talk is familiar, isn't it, Goats? They push that Q-tard nonsense as if they are given a script by Israel everyday. They think we are stupid goyim. Syrazie and her friend make many feminazi comments just like this, celebrating attacking men: https://imgoat.com/uploads/b8619251a1/129120.jpg

Syrazie just modded Shizy. This is what they want and who they are: https://imgoat.com/uploads/b8619251a1/129127.jpg

The great Awakening tribe constantly make subverting comments like this: https://imgoat.com/uploads/b8619251a1/129122.jpg Then ban anyone who calls them out on it. We've seen this before, haven't we? https://imgoat.com/uploads/b8619251a1/129123.jpg

Here's a list of the ziotards

@Syrazie, @Doob, @Oh_Well_Ian, @Shizy, @Blacksmith21 and their various alts.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

BigFatDaddy ago

They didn't ban me, but Shizy and Oh_Well_Ian flipped out like absolute spergs the one time I commented that I was skeptical of something Q said Trump would do (take over the Fed). Turned out he's just appointing more governors to its board, so their reeing was for nothing. Still, the mere fact that the word "skeptical" triggered them so bad says a lot to me.

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2645897/13377398

thisistotallynotme ago

It sucks that there is such a knee-jerk reaction of "if you disagree, you are likely shill", because it turns away those that were genuinely interested and had actual questions.

The problem is there are literally hundreds of examples of CIAniggers fucking with these threads since October. Expect spergs to sperg when provoked, and try not to let that make you lose sight of the information the spergs are trying to pass on.

Either way, come December, much of this doubt will have long since cleared-up. All it'll take is one reporter to ask Trump "Who is Q?"

BigFatDaddy ago

Either way, come December, much of this doubt will have long since cleared-up.

Off topic, but I was VERY happy earlier to see an article about Trump having meetings on Election Security. I've been nervous as hell about the inevitable dem voter fraud this November. Really glad to know Trump is making plans to counter it.

thisistotallynotme ago

(Literally the only constructive post in the entire thread)

Admittedly, I'm definitely on the Q side of leanings, but if what we're all researching is correct, August is supposedly when the Clinton server is going to be released to the public (Pretty sure it's just Assange's 2013 300GB insurance file on The Pirate Bay, so I downloaded it for when the sha256 key is released). At the very least, tons of classified documents, if not shadier shit than Podesta ever dared to keep in his inbox. Anthony Weiner's Laptop is supposed to be released as an October Surprise.

Now, assuming what we've heard about that INSURANCE folder on Weiner's laptop is true, How many people are going to be voting democrat in November?

BigFatDaddy ago

This is my biggest problem with the Q posts. They keep pushing the deadline. Wait for August... Wait for October... Wait for January... Wait Wait Wait.

4.3% GDP is great and all, but goddammit! I want that bitch locked up and I want my wall!

thisistotallynotme ago

You're not wrong, but I think the "wait" thing has been overhyped by opposition. Q isn't making predictions of timelines. Most of the time, he's talking about the past. I think the main prediction Q's ever made was "By the time we're done he[Barack obama]'ll be claiming Kenyan Citizenship as a way to escape".

As for locking the bitch up, it needs more of the populace on-board. if even 30% of the people still support Hillary, it'll be a civil war when she's executed. I bet full-disclosure of the server/laptop would do that, eh?

BigFatDaddy ago

if even 30% of the people still support Hillary, it'll be a civil war when she's executed.

I have a hard time believing any of them would go to war for Hillary. The niggers would do it for Obama (maybe) and the bolsheviks want to start the fight right now regardless, but I don't see a single one of them saying "I draw the line at Hillary. I'm with her!"

thisistotallynotme ago

The line to hook them will be:
"I'm not a Hillary supporter (I voted for Trump), but I can't just let them railroad this poor woman! She may not be my president, but we have a thing called Due Process in this country, and we can't let Military Tribunals try a political candidate out of the public eye, without giving her the rights guaranteed under the Constitution!"

Now, imagine they're prosecuting at least one former President at the same time. Do you see how a voting block motivated by emotions could be easily-manipulated into a civil war?

BigFatDaddy ago

No, because they're cowards motivated entirely by group psychology.

A more likely scenario would be: Obama is in front of the Military Tribunal as well and agents provocateur rile up the niggers in several cities to stage a full-blown level 5 chimpout at the same time. This gives the antifa fags their vitally important first wave, so they follow behind and start trying to join in. Subversive elements of the Police and Military forces then use this as cover to attempt a coup under the guise of popular rebellion. Of course thats how the international media would spin it.

But there's still major problems for the left. Firstly, any faggot soyboy whites (or jews) trying to join the chimpout are almost immediately turned on and killed by the blacks. The bolshevik leaders have no way to prevent this. This effectively eliminates the antifa commies as a viable force, as well as confining the rioting blacks to their own urban shithole zones.

The subversives in the military are the minority, and despite the lying media's claims they will NOT have popular support, so odds are that their coup is swiftly crushed. Subverted police forces are still a major problem, especially with the military hardware they received via the Drug War. However, any attempts by them to do anything besides protecting the rioting nuggers will be stalemated or defeated by patriots using guerilla tactics in suburban and rural areas, until the Military finishes its own housecleaning and comes to arrest the corrupt PD leaders for treason as well.

thisistotallynotme ago

No, because they're cowards motivated entirely by group psychology.

You've been paying attention to the last 10+ years, where they've been openly programming the populace to revolt against their leaders? It started in 2003 with the "VOTE OR DIE" push, from what I recall.

A more likely scenario would be:

...Wherein you lay out how a civil war would play out.

The only problem with this scenario is the money required, and if you haven't noticed, POTUS' executive order in december froze all those bank accounts worldwide. Soros rushed to give his son all his money. Rothschilds are selling property (has that ever happened before?) that has been in the family for ages. Hillary Clinton is flying coach. In addition, Al-Waleed Bin Talal was hung upside-down by his balls until he traded not being hung upside-down by his balls for $6 billion in assets/stocks/cash.

Now, I'm sure they could potentially find some angel investor to fund a campaign, but thankfully, Trump was smart enough to kill those resources (for the most part) before even his first strike in November.

But all of the above is evidence on why it would be preferable to prevent a civil war from happening. Those soyboy cucks are still Americans, so we need to re-integrate them once the programming they've endured wears off.

This, above all else, is why it's taking so long to lock her up.

BigFatDaddy ago

You've been paying attention to the last 10+ years, where they've been openly programming the populace to revolt against their leaders?

Bolsheviks gonna bolshevik. Doesn't change the fact that the antifa types are cowards who only act in groups outnumbering their opponents by at least 2 to 1 and with the backing of police forces to boot.

The only problem with this scenario is the money required

They still own the Fed. They can create any funding they need, at least for now. Furthermore, the scenario I laid out doesn't assume a protracted conflict, it assumes an attempted coup using an astroturphed popular uprising as cover (just like they did in Ukraine, Syria, Egypt, Liberia, etc).

I DO agree that President Trump is doing everything in his power to prevent such a scenario. I think he's working damn hard to stop the civil war that was on the horizon. But unless he also does some major shit that even goes against his own policy positions (like repealing the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 and approving the physical removal of over 30 million people) I'm not entirely convinced that civil war isn't preferable considering the long term demographic trends of the country.

Finally, I also somewhat buy into the theory that the bolsheviks are infighting with the zionists as to how to proceed, with the bolsheviks wanting to fight now, and the zionists wanting to wait another 40-50 years until the demographics are on their side. Obviously, it's the zionists in charge of the Fed, which does more to limit the bolsheviks' funding than Trump's asset seizures. Unfortunately, this only further implies a need for conflict sooner rather than later while the demographics are still on our side.

thisistotallynotme ago

Did you notice Trump putting 4 new people on the Fed's board of directors? Apparently, it's just a start. Fed's not going to be removed, but apparently regulated. Knowing what I know about the federal bankruptcy, this might not be the worst idea.

I see your point about removing 30 million people, but I suspect he's trying to play the Reagan angle, and convince them all to vote for him instead of the crazies. Far better to get these useful idiots on your side than deport them, don't you think? Especially if you're setting the stage to guarantee a Pence 8-year run after 2024.

auralsects ago

  1. you guys are totally irredeemable larpfags who should kill themselves twice

  2. you just admitted not only to keeping 30m spics and their offspring to leech and eventually swamp white America, but to accepting an even more blatant Zio-shill in Pence as your leader.

Trumptards will get the rope first

thisistotallynotme ago

I disagree with your opinion, but will defend to the death your right to have it.

Shame it wasn't a two-way street, eh?

BigFatDaddy ago

Did you notice Trump putting 4 new people on the Fed's board of directors?

Yeah, I saw that. But I won't be excited until they start talking "audit".

I suspect he's trying to play the Reagan angle, and convince them all to vote for him instead of the crazies.

I agree. Trump is an admitted Civ-Nat. He sees absolutely no problem with the demographic decline of America.

Far better to get these useful idiots on your side than deport them, don't you think?

No, because as things stand Whites officially lose the majority in America in 20 years. After that, the country either turns into Brazil or South Africa. Either way, America as we knew it ceases to exist.

Especially if you're setting the stage to guarantee a Pence 8-year run after 2024.

We need someone further Right than Pence in 2024. We need to find a charismatic as hell full-on White Nationalist if we want any hope of preserving our Nation short of armed conflict.

thisistotallynotme ago

I think the main thing you and I disagree on is whether armed conflict will ever happen.

If Trump (or any subsequent POTUS) went full-Hitler, unless he had already conquered the world, you would see a massive backlash to the point of UN occupation of US soil, which obviously would lead to full-on world war. And we know how history treats those that lose wars.

Keep in mind that the "Demographic Decline" you mention is temporary; You'll have a good 10 years of the "le 51% face" CIA meme, but after two generations, all that mud blood is bred-out, as the homogenous "American Culture" makes it less of an issue that niggers have darker skin than us. The ones that don't leave will eventually be bred white, considering it'd take exactly one more Baby Boom to re-whiten this entire country.

BigFatDaddy ago

I think the main thing you and I disagree on is whether armed conflict will ever happen.

I think it MAY become inevitable, due to the demographics problem. But, even WITH the demographics, it still might not. Slow Boil is a thing, and if they go the Brazil Route instead of South Africa, White Americans might accept it if it happens gradually enough.

you would see a massive backlash to the point of UN occupation of US soil, which obviously would lead to full-on world war.

That could (arguably) be the best thing for us. The first time a blue helmet shoots an American on American Soil, it's over for them. The American People have more guns and bullets than the entire UN Peacekeeping Force combined (minus US Military of course, who will split at least 60-40 pro patriot).

"Demographic Decline" you mention is temporary; You'll have a good 10 years of the "le 51% face" CIA meme, but after two generations, all that mud blood is bred-out

Only if White Men were impregnanting brown and black females. We're not, its the other way around. Furthermore, while black fertility rates decline rapidly in absence of welfare, hispanic rates do not. Even if we remove the 30 million illegal mexicans, those that remain would outbreed the Whites in a century or so, assuming no changes from current rates.

the homogenous "American Culture" makes it less of an issue that niggers have darker skin than us.

This is absolutely false. Cultures come from genetics, not the other way around. Anyone claiming that the only difference between Whites and Blacks is skin color is either woefully misinformed, or dishonest.

The ones that don't leave will eventually be bred white,

Again, ONLY if White Men were knocking up sheboons, which we're not, and have no interest in doing. Even then, it would take A LOT more than 2 generations to breed the nigger out of someone. Look at Spain and Sicily.

it'd take exactly one more Baby Boom to re-whiten this entire country.

That COULD work, assuming a reversal of current government policies that incentivize non-whites to breed and disincentivize whites.

CheeseboogersGhost ago

I've had them sperg out at high levels before after they ping spammed me. Its obvious what they are.

bdmthrfkr ago

I am willing to go with the shitskin shill theory, kikes do bash themselves when they shill but I can recognize the hatred when you do it. You still fall into 1 of the 3 most hated categories here on Voat, please help me decide which it is.

  1. Draw mufuckface (or disparage him in print)

or

  1. Join the White race and post a picture of you eating bacon (we will reverse search the picture so it had better be OC).

Until you do one of those two things we will just assume that you are the enemy...which you are. @srayzie

Vindicator ago

Nice!

srayzie ago

🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣 BOOM!

CheeseboogersGhost ago

oy vey its almost as if this is a jewish trick

bdmthrfkr ago

Pic when?

Hand_of_Node ago

What are the three categories?

And noticing your ping, are you one of the Q people? If so, why?

bdmthrfkr ago

Hey, newfag, get with the pogrom! The categories are...

  1. Kikes and their liberal minions

  2. Shitskin moslem invaders

  3. Niggers

Who else would it be?

Hand_of_Node ago

Ah, was thinking shills, jews, and 'something'.

Anyway, the first cult I encountered after arriving In Cultifornia was the Breatharians, when I attended their first public talk. (meet your nutritional needs by breathing - seriously) There've been many cults here since then. The "Q" thing seems to generate the same kind of fervor among its adherents, based on a similar level of evidence.

Vindicator ago

The "Q" thing seems to generate the same kind of fervor among its adherents, based on a similar level of evidence.

Only someone who has not seriously examined what Q has said would claim this. He has repeatedly proven -- literally dozens of times -- he is who he claims. He also has predicted numerous specific events before they happened and/or became news, starting with the coup in SA. Some things he predicted have either not happened yet, or been acknowledged by him as disinfo. All that comment like this one does is make it clear to all that you aren't actually interested in considering the evidence in a serious manner for yourself; which is the position of all major media outlets as they have been eager to report for the past few days.

Hand_of_Node ago

Maybe it's a similar effect to those dot pics in color-blindness tests, but I read a number of those and saw nothing interesting enough to seriously examine. In this age of craziness, I don't entirely write it off as a bunch of hooey. Maybe there's a small chance that Q is real, in 'some sense'?

If that were true, the whole op would then be even more bizarre, at least to non-cult members, because there's no question about whether it's taken on the form of a cult or not. Look, whether it's in the pattern of the shaken chicken bones, in the shape and frequency of the clouds in smoke signals, or in mysterious and vague assortments of words posted anonymously to the internet, this is a bizarre method for revealing the secrets of our planetary government.

The "Q" thing seems to generate the same kind of fervor among its adherents, based on a similar level of evidence.

Only someone who has not seriously examined what Q has said would claim this. He has repeatedly proven -- literally dozens of times -- he is who he claims.

Can you detect the irony in your fervent response?

I would ask you to point me to those proofs, and still will... But I suspect they would be based on interpretations of those bone/cloud/anon post patterns. If there's credible proof, I would take a look at it.

(I've also given a fair shake to the flat earth proponents, the "no man on the moon" people, the "nukes aren't real" folks, and some others. Unlike the credible evidence I'm sure you're about to reveal, they just quite never got to the point of producing reality-based evidence. But I'm serious, despite the sarcasm slipping into that last sentence. I'll give it a chance and take a look.)

An interesting, and perhaps relevant article: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Evaluating_Evidence

srayzie ago

You could try looking at this.

Have you seen it @Vindicator?

Vindicator ago

I had not. Thanks for the link, srayz. :-)

srayzie ago

You’re welcome. Qproofs.com too

Vindicator ago

Thank you for the interesting link, HofN. I will peruse.

I am somewhat limited for time at the moment, but I will see what I can put together in the way of proofs.

Can you detect the irony in your fervent response?

From your point of view, yes. Yet your interpretation of my response as "fervent" is totally subjective. My statement was completely factual. I used no emotional moderators in my language. It was purely a statement of fact. The only -ly adjectives I used were "repeatedly" and "literally dozens". Those are both quantitative. Yet you saw it as "fervent". That is a very handy way of discounting what I said. If you care about the truth, you should care about that. This is hardcore information warfare we are trying to wade through. We need disciplined thinking if we hope to discern what is going on so we can decide whether we support it or not.

Hand_of_Node ago

Was admittedly being a little hyperbolic with that, although I would contend that it kind of "fits the form", even if the specific wording was more neutral. And yes, I care about "the truth", although we humans can only see bits and parts of that, even if you discount the spiritual realm.

This is hardcore information warfare we are trying to wade through.

There are a lot of narratives out there, with many of them being shaped and refined for centuries. I'll just leave it at that.

For me to end up taking the Q thing seriously, there are two main issues to overcome. The first is what I see as the weird cult around "the mysterious Q", and the reason that "Q" has promoted this phenomenon with the cryptic messages and anon status. It's designed to be a cult, and that creates a pretty strong credibility issue. The second is the veracity of the content itself, although that's less relevant, as it's not worth considering until credibility is established.

A big problem is that the Q crowd in general seems pretty low-IQ. Have seen them a bit on other forums, and the ones that tried to flee to voat during that reddit drama didn't exactly raise the bar. I'm aware that the beliefs of morons have no actual effect on truth and reality, but that's definitely a red flag. I mean, they do seem to be "good people" in intent and general character. Just not the place I'd look for insightful analysis and discernment.

I will see what I can put together in the way of proofs

Perhaps I'll be surprised? (Sorry about the length of this. The caffeine seems to have taken hold.)

BigFatDaddy ago

Well, apparently they want fewer skeptics on Voat because anyone skeptical of Q is a shill.

Definitely activates the ol' almonds I'd say.

Shizy ago

I don't think that's entirely true. I'm skeptical of most things, Q included. I'm not 100% sold on it all. I would like to believe it's real and true, but that would be foolish! Especially after knowing what we here tend to know about being lied to about everything for the majority of our lives.

CheeseboogersGhost ago

You're so damn dumb you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground, FEMINAZI CUNTRAG

Shizy ago

Ohhhhh, good one! You're getting more creative now!

CheeseboogersGhost ago

You aint seen nothin' yet, darlin' ah ah ah

Shizy ago

Eh, you keep saying that, but not delivering. I think I may block you again unless you can show me you have upped your game!

BigFatDaddy ago

[–] Oh_Well_ian 3 points (+3|-0) 3 days ago

We actually need far fewer skeptics around here.

My experience is that skeptics do ZERO heavy lifting and are more likely to be dragging down the team.

You were in that comment chain. Did you agree or disagree with Ian? Were you one of the people who Upvoted his comment?

Shizy ago

You know the answer to that since you were the only one I replied to! And it was about JFK not about skeptics. I typically don't agree with Ian on most things, including this. It's ok to disagree.

BigFatDaddy ago

That's fair enough. Notice, I never accused YOU of acting like a sperg.

Shizy ago

I did notice that. Thank you!