How is it less likely, lmao. Honestly, for a website like Voat a lot of you are incredibly naive. We have no idea who has access to the Putt account. No fucking idea whatsoever.
You're the one lacking in the reading comprehension department bud. I understand the words you're using. It's not any less likely. We have no idea who posted from Putts account.
Again, I've never said that it was guaranteed he was alive. We don't know if it is him. The fact that his account posting says two distinct possibilities:
1) he is alive, well, and is posting himself.
2) someone has deemed it necessary to impersonate him to the point to where they would spend time, money, and manpower in order to do so.
The second possibility seems a lot less likely to me personally because voat isn't all that significant in the grand scheme of things. If we were a lot larger, then yes, but not as we are now (at the very least, we aren't big enough to justify the hire of a hitman, hacker, active impersonator, and a myriad of other support staff to support this operation.)
Now there is another possibility: he is alive and well BUT is being coerced/has been bought out by (((them))). This we cannot know until we get more information.
So stop your concern trolling and be a faggot somewhere else.
The amount we assume about Voat is incredible. We know very little for certain. All I'm saying is that someone popping in as Putt doesn't mean anything. I'd also say that since he's reappeared he hasn't really explained anything about what happened, so that's fishy in and of itself.
There's absolutely no reason to rejoice in my opinion. Maybe if Putt had been more transparent over the past year, and let us all know what's been happening with the financials and everything else. However there's been a lot of strange shit going on and this recent downtime is just the icing on the cake for many of us who are more skeptical about what's actually happening here.
Again, I see no reason to assume he hasn't been taken out. Maybe it wasn't this past week. Might have happened last year, or even the year before. We really just have absolutely no idea.
I'm leaving every option open right now, ranging from him being "our guy" alive and well, to him being dead and replaced. His next announcement will only be further evidence to the status of Putt and the future of Voat as a whole.
The only reason I was happy to see a post from his account I the first place was because it reduced the likelyhood of someone else being ganked by the deep state. I'm not saying that it negated all possibility, just that it reduced the chances.
I guess I was mostly just saying that if he was ganked by the deep state they would probably post under his account to make it look like everything was ok. Cheers.
at the very least, we aren't big enough to justify the hire of a hitman, hacker, active impersonator, and a myriad of other support staff to support this operation.
I'm not saying that it isn't out of the question, but I am doubtful whether Voat is important enough for that sort of operation
view the rest of the comments →
Fibbideh ago
We're rejoicing because it's now a lot less likely that Putt was Clinton'd. He still needs to explain a few things, but I'm just glad he isn't dead.
Pissant ago
How is it less likely, lmao. Honestly, for a website like Voat a lot of you are incredibly naive. We have no idea who has access to the Putt account. No fucking idea whatsoever.
Fibbideh ago
What is reading comprehension, anyways?
Pissant ago
You're the one lacking in the reading comprehension department bud. I understand the words you're using. It's not any less likely. We have no idea who posted from Putts account.
Fibbideh ago
Again, I've never said that it was guaranteed he was alive. We don't know if it is him. The fact that his account posting says two distinct possibilities:
1) he is alive, well, and is posting himself.
2) someone has deemed it necessary to impersonate him to the point to where they would spend time, money, and manpower in order to do so.
The second possibility seems a lot less likely to me personally because voat isn't all that significant in the grand scheme of things. If we were a lot larger, then yes, but not as we are now (at the very least, we aren't big enough to justify the hire of a hitman, hacker, active impersonator, and a myriad of other support staff to support this operation.)
Now there is another possibility: he is alive and well BUT is being coerced/has been bought out by (((them))). This we cannot know until we get more information.
So stop your concern trolling and be a faggot somewhere else.
Pissant ago
You don't cope well with people disagreeing with you hey? Grow up. You cant force everyone to see the world the way you do.
Fibbideh ago
Do you believe that none of options I presented are what happened?
Pissant ago
My original statement stands.
The amount we assume about Voat is incredible. We know very little for certain. All I'm saying is that someone popping in as Putt doesn't mean anything. I'd also say that since he's reappeared he hasn't really explained anything about what happened, so that's fishy in and of itself.
There's absolutely no reason to rejoice in my opinion. Maybe if Putt had been more transparent over the past year, and let us all know what's been happening with the financials and everything else. However there's been a lot of strange shit going on and this recent downtime is just the icing on the cake for many of us who are more skeptical about what's actually happening here.
Again, I see no reason to assume he hasn't been taken out. Maybe it wasn't this past week. Might have happened last year, or even the year before. We really just have absolutely no idea.
Also the Canary is dead, so there's that as well.
Fibbideh ago
And I'm not disagreeing with you.
I'm leaving every option open right now, ranging from him being "our guy" alive and well, to him being dead and replaced. His next announcement will only be further evidence to the status of Putt and the future of Voat as a whole.
The only reason I was happy to see a post from his account I the first place was because it reduced the likelyhood of someone else being ganked by the deep state. I'm not saying that it negated all possibility, just that it reduced the chances.
Pissant ago
I guess I was mostly just saying that if he was ganked by the deep state they would probably post under his account to make it look like everything was ok. Cheers.
Fibbideh ago
I'm not saying that it isn't out of the question, but I am doubtful whether Voat is important enough for that sort of operation