You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

BB-3 ago

@PuttitOut this is serious. If anon subs aren't anonymous for everybody, they're not anonymous.

WhiteSurvivalist ago

The idea that you can't post there without being logged in should be the first dead give away.

thantik ago

If you were able to post there without being logged in, there would be no way to protect voat against massive spam attacks, etc. There still should be one, and only one username to a person.

WhiteSurvivalist ago

Sounds self defeating then, either it's anonymous and requires no login but moderation, or it's not and is merely a deliberate facade as OP notes.

thantik ago

Your argument is a false dichotomy fallacy. It's not either/or. You can have anonymization and login required.

WhiteSurvivalist ago

You can have anonymization and login required.

If you say so.

thantik ago

I say so. How do you think your password for voat is stored, eh? You think hunter2 is just sitting in a database somewhere in clear text?

No. It's single-way hashed, and when you enter your password for verification, it's single-way hashed again. The hashes are checked against one another against that encryption algorithm.

If your diminutive understanding of technology were the truth, then it would be the same as the web admin just having open-access to your password. That's not how technology works, and it's easily possible to both require a log in, and submit information to a database without it being tied to a specific user -- even possible for the programmer of the website to make it so HE cannot even know who it is, if it is done correctly.

BlueDrache ago

Did you provide aloe for that burn?