Fair warning to my fellow goats - Account anonymity in anon subs is a fallacy and what you write can and will get used against you. (whatever)

submitted ago by NeedleStack

This post is an advisory to users that your username is connected to whatever you write in anon subs.

What you write can be seen by one or more devs who’ve been given that special access. But what you may not know is that they can and do use it against you as they’ve done with me in the past and as recently as yesterday. And one or more of those users who have this ability are part of SBBH.

Some history: One of the SBBH members had a hissy fit with me over a year ago and is probably the same user who would “miraculously” happen to know it was me when I would write certain things in anon subs in the past. I’d write something and they’d make a snarky remark revealing that they knew were talking to my account. It wasn’t a huge deal but it made me aware that my username could be seen by one or more users with this special access.

Back to present day: I’d never bothered to get caught up in SBBH drama until about a week ago when I started needling them in anon subs with a comment here or there regarding their questionable activities on voat.

It didn’t take long for one of them to take the bait and clearly refer to me when making this remark about my recent comments:

http://archive.is/eBPYZ

My account is exactly 2.7 years old. Whoever wrote that comment was a fool; for so obviously ‘giving away’ that they could see it was me writing those comments (showing their hand), and to give such a sensitive shit over what I wrote (notice it took anti-SBBH comments for them to get fresh and reveal themselves).

Let this story be a warning to any of you that this ‘special access’ to see which user is writing “anon” comments creates an unfair advantage and in the wrong hands can be used against you. At the same time, these privileged few are able to enjoy the ability to hide in anon subs themselves.

@PuttItOut, users will never be free to “have their say” in anon subs until everyone but you is stripped of the ability to see who’s posting what in so-called anon subs.

--

Edit: Hey, cool! My post got a "Speculation" flair. Perhaps the first in voat's history in v/Whatever.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

TheBuddha ago

Those SBBH people are terrible! They should all be banned!

NeedleStack ago

Ha ha.

TheBuddha ago

giggles

I can assure you, it wasn't me. Not that you probably thought it was me, but I figure I should state it aloud. I only accepted the mod invite to SBBH 'cause I kept getting accused of being one and I enjoy antagonizing @freshmeat. Seriously, you might want to try it. Go poke 'em with a stick, it's funnier than hell.

I figure I've been accused of just about everything, so I might as well revel in it. I'm a shill for Big Math and the Classical Guitar Cabal. We've infiltrated everywhere!

GoatyMcGoatface ago

I've yet to see the formal proof for 2+2=4

TheBuddha ago

http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/as2446/224.pdf

You'll need to understand set theory. Bertrand Russell took like 163 pages to prove that 1 + 1 = 2. I don't recommend reading it.

totes_magotes ago

Someone had too much time.

TheBuddha ago

Meh... Mathematicians have a high standard for proof. In this case, it's largely just set theory and understanding what a set of natural numbers is. In the end, Ol' Bert largely concluded it was logicism all the way down. I think he was a bit of a fatalist. His other philosophical works kind of support this.