You don't have to be the original source. Doxing = divulging personal info on line. I'm sure they guy has mentioned his name on the internet before if he's stupid enough to do it once, however, that doesn't' mean repeating it doesn't also fit the bill.
You guys are all so green, this is hard to watch....
I've remained too consistent for you to call me a white night only for me to worry about it at all.
I'm trying to help people here. Why? I don't know, because I like that I have certain freedoms, so I want to make sure other people can maintain certain freedoms. But, with those freedoms, we have certain rights that can't be ignored. He ignored his rights, and that's his prerogative, but he doesn't deserve Crensch spreading his personal information. Maybe he isn't so sure about the dangers of having your personal information on the internet, and we shouldn't fault him for his ignorance in the way of continually sharing his information that is now out there, along with capturing the image and spreading the capture so he has no way to recant it later.
You really don't understand what you're advocating for, do you?
You've single handedly done more to expose him publicly & spread his information around than @Crensch did. If it weren't for your posts & attacks on Crensch, only a fraction of the users would have seen it.
Since you've decided to white knight for @TexasVet, you've made yourself guilty of everything you claim to be denouncing. Your actions probably did more damage to his privacy than anything else.
He ignored his rights, and that's his prerogative.
So mind your own business, he made a choice as a grown man.
Maybe he isn't so sure about the dangers of having your personal information on the internet, and we shouldn't fault him for his ignorance in the way of continually sharing his information that is now out there...
In the age of information, ignorance is a choice, just like ignorance is never an acceptable defense in any legal matters (ie : doxing)
I believe the name was already given by someone else in another thread or post. That information was already made public. So he didn't dox anyone here.
I'm tired of reiterating the same point over and over again.
From a purely pragmatic stand point, taking operational security in to account, the damage is done due to exposure. My position remains, as it has from the beginning, that whether or not he gave out his information primarily is unimportant, rather the risk increases as the information garners exposure.
Which is why he took an Archiv link of it right away, so that if buddy realized the implications of having his real name out there he can't edit it or remove it?
Walter Mitty is slang for stolen valor. Based off the book about the guy who daydreams about living grand lives better than his own, including a war time soldier.
view the rest of the comments →
SexMachine ago
Someone else called him out for being a Walter Mitty. I asked him at least once about the accusations, but he never replied.
I'll ask again, @TexasVet, what do you say about the stolen valor claims being made about you?
Crensch ago
http://archive.is/nZPu2
He's most definitely Sean Sweat - he admits it. Not sure if Walter Mitty is an alias, though.
Pissant ago
Nice, using an Archive link to doxx someone hey? That's classy.
Pissant ago
@kevdude nothing to see here eh?
Just Crensch trying to ruin someones life for speaking out and trying to organize people.
NotHereForPizza ago
Jesus, now Crensch is doxing people.
Is this a global rule violation? It should be.
@puttitout Crensch is mentioning another user's first and last name here.
adhdferret ago
Hold your taters buddy. User already admitted it within their history twice. So ain't nothing here that is doxing.
NotHereForPizza ago
No, that's not what doxing is.
You don't have to be the original source. Doxing = divulging personal info on line. I'm sure they guy has mentioned his name on the internet before if he's stupid enough to do it once, however, that doesn't' mean repeating it doesn't also fit the bill.
Rotteuxx ago
It's not doxing if it's info freely available online, especially when the info is supplied by the doxed faggot.
The "doxed" faggot posted it himself here this morning after having done it elsewhere in the past.
Your attempt at white knighting for this faggot is eery as fuck. Especially since the first line of your top rated comment is :
NotHereForPizza ago
You guys are all so green, this is hard to watch....
I've remained too consistent for you to call me a white night only for me to worry about it at all.
I'm trying to help people here. Why? I don't know, because I like that I have certain freedoms, so I want to make sure other people can maintain certain freedoms. But, with those freedoms, we have certain rights that can't be ignored. He ignored his rights, and that's his prerogative, but he doesn't deserve Crensch spreading his personal information. Maybe he isn't so sure about the dangers of having your personal information on the internet, and we shouldn't fault him for his ignorance in the way of continually sharing his information that is now out there, along with capturing the image and spreading the capture so he has no way to recant it later.
You really don't understand what you're advocating for, do you?
Rotteuxx ago
You've single handedly done more to expose him publicly & spread his information around than @Crensch did. If it weren't for your posts & attacks on Crensch, only a fraction of the users would have seen it.
Since you've decided to white knight for @TexasVet, you've made yourself guilty of everything you claim to be denouncing. Your actions probably did more damage to his privacy than anything else.
So mind your own business, he made a choice as a grown man.
In the age of information, ignorance is a choice, just like ignorance is never an acceptable defense in any legal matters (ie : doxing)
adhdferret ago
Whatever doesn't matter as admin has clearly defined what doxing is.
MadWorld ago
It doesn't stop the disrupters from propagating false information...
MadWorld ago
I believe the name was already given by someone else in another thread or post. That information was already made public. So he didn't dox anyone here.
NotHereForPizza ago
You don't understand how doxing works.
Leave. Don't poke that bear. That's a bear you can't unpoke.
MadWorld ago
Aren't we all here poking bears? What a hypocrite!
NotHereForPizza ago
I'm tired of reiterating the same point over and over again.
From a purely pragmatic stand point, taking operational security in to account, the damage is done due to exposure. My position remains, as it has from the beginning, that whether or not he gave out his information primarily is unimportant, rather the risk increases as the information garners exposure.
Pissant ago
Which is why he took an Archiv link of it right away, so that if buddy realized the implications of having his real name out there he can't edit it or remove it?
Nothing to see here guys...
SexMachine ago
What was the v/Identitarian breakdown? I try to avoid drama.
Pissant ago
Crensch and his buddies stirred shit, as per usual. Now he's claiming abuse.
Crensch ago
I'm not entirely sure, myself. Not sure it's worth picking apart in order to understand it at this point.
SexMachine ago
Walter Mitty is slang for stolen valor. Based off the book about the guy who daydreams about living grand lives better than his own, including a war time soldier.