And yet leftist media, their buzzwords and phrases, their narrative pushes, and the leftists themselves are all available for everyone to see.
It's almost as if people calling this place an echo chamber don't understand that if the leftist arguments were compelling, that we might agree with them.
So which is it:
A non-censored place where the best ideas win is an echo chamber of the best ideas
-or-
A non-censored place where the best ideas win is not an echo chamber
view the rest of the comments →
Philosopher_King ago
Voat does endorse censorship with allowing you to vote and down vote. Voat is a "right-winged" echo chamber, and because of this, the "right-winged" people vote up any content THEY personally agree with and down vote anything else. So only the ideas of "right-winged" people come to the top.
The moment you speak out against the norm on this site, you get called a cuck and shill and down voted. People here just don't like labels and being called "right-winged" because it's not entirely them, but they are guilty of being like-minded with the masses in here.
Crensch ago
That's not censorship, it's, at worst, minimizing a comment, but usually just ordering it to the bottom. It's also not done by some higher power - everyone gets a vote.
I downvote lies. I downvote MSM narrative pushing. Guess what doesn't happen here? Mods and admins removing entire narratives, and those that post those narratives.
Generally that doesn't happen to usernames that have been around and garnered a respectable amount of scp/ccp. Of course it happens to the new accounts that want to act like the sandnigger invaders.
No, people don't like when faggots try to paint Voat as being just as bad as rEddit with censorship and being an echo chamber.