This has emerged a number of times on Voat. Ricky Dearman did have a business registered at 88-90 Hatton garden as do THOUSANDS of other businesses; it is a known "registered office" address - admittedly some will no doubt be illegitimate registrations for tax evasion purposes etc - but many are legit and the practice is perfectly legal. Barbara Kahan is indeed ex Tavistock but spent her life exposing nefarious activities with children and the social services network. Her name has been used many times as a company director to set up a company and then replaced later by the actual director - and yes, some of these companies are indeed questionable (although many are not) and again, this practice is perfectly legal although her name was indeed used to open the company associated with Dearman and as such that business in itself is likely suspect because of what we know about him. However, many Voaters have associated him with the Diamond Heist that took place at the same address, but wrongly describe the discovery of "compromising" photos found during that particular robbery. The fact is that one of the thieves involved in the Hatton Garden Robbery was also involved in a previous heist in 1971 at Lloyds Bank in Baker Street in 1971 which is the actual robbery where the photos were found, NOT the Hatton garden robbery so the association between Dearman, the Hatton Garden Robbery and the compromising photos is completely erroneous. I hope this helps explain.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/hatton-garden-heist-leader-found-7196229.amp

Do be quiet, you're the normie.