Seriously though. When the only evidence for the Holocaust in the first place hinges upon eye-witness testimonies, and one-by-one these testimonies are outed as fake, what remains but a blatant fabrication?

The term "holocaust" was not even used to describe WWII in any way until the 70s. Find me a reference in literature prior to 1970 that refers to WWII specifically.

And the fact that all of the death camps happened to be in territory that the Soviets ended up occupying after the war, that not a single camp the Allies inspected could have possibly been a death camp?

And the fact that initial numbers for Auschwitz in terms of Jewish deaths were around 4.5 million, which over the years reduced to less than one million, and yet the 6 million figure never changed?

And the Leuchter Report? And David Cole's documentary?

And the lack of a single formal order from Hitler stating anything about exterminating the Jews (or anyone!) despite the fact that the Allies seized millions of documents from the Nazis after the war?

There are too many inconsistencies, too many coincidences, and not enough actual evidence to possibly make an argument that the holocaust narrative is correct.

And yet everyone believes it.