See how that works with these faggots? "I'm tired of X" -> "Why don't you talk to them" -> "X is just as bad as Y" He 100% rejected your suggesting of talking with us despite the extremely hospitable way you phrased everything for him.
The above is not an argument, it's an absurdity. Voaters are just as bad as the leftist cucks on rEddit? Really? On which website can you actually type out what you want to say and not have to worry about getting banned or shadowbanned?
Faggots like this don't even attempt to put some kind of reason into their words, they just make assertions and play their sad song while making false-equivalence fallacies.
Maybe instead of playing this passive-aggressive footsie with people that don't see you for what you are, you could sack up and sound off like you've got a pair. You might even wind up changing someone's mind instead of breeding utter contempt for acting like a fucking kike.
The above is not an argument, it's an absurdity. Voaters are just as bad as the leftist cucks on rEddit? Really?
You seem fond of labelling inconvenient truths absurdities. You have so many people on here drowning in truly impressive levels of stupidity.. who are reduced to reflexively screaming vacuous voat catchphrases as pitiful cries for approval.
On which website can you actually type out what you want to say and not have to worry about getting banned or shadowbanned?
Not this one. Those passionate Hillary supporters and many others can't freely express their opinions without suffering CCP restrictions, which equate to periodic website bans. Free speech just for you and yours is not free speech: but we've already established that you're happy to ignore your own hypocrisy.
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
You seem fond of labelling inconvenient truths absurdities.
You seem to post a lot of absurdities.
You have so many people on here drowning in truly impressive levels of stupidity.. who are reduced to reflexively screaming vacuous voat catchphrases as pitiful cries for approval.
Projecting rEddit onto Voat really doesn't work well. Projecting your own faults onto others is kinda the same.
Not this one. Those passionate Hillary supporters and many others can't freely express their opinions without suffering CCP restrictions,
Not bans.
which equate to periodic website bans.
No, they don't.
Free speech just for you and yours is not free speech: but we've already established that you're happy to ignore your own hypocrisy.
There is no hypocrisy. You're making false-equivalencies and strutting around as if you've won.
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
Well done, are you a politician in real life? Deny everything and run away..
When I've made my 10 comments for the day, and my censorship kicks in so that I can't comment at all anywhere on voat - I call that a pretty effective website ban. If I was someone who liked to post a lot, I would quickly hit my limit there as well. No commenting, no posting, no messaging other users = website ban, while your drooling retards get to take as many free shots as they like. I know the average voat argument is pretty weak, but you need to set out on the hard path of self-respect.
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
When I've made my 10 comments for the day, and my censorship kicks in so that I can't comment at all anywhere on voat - I call that a pretty effective website ban.
I call it the consequences of not contributing anything, and then when you're not able to do what others are, whining about how society isn't fair. It's not exactly difficult to build up positive ccp.
If I was someone who liked to post a lot, I would quickly hit my limit there as well.
Admission that you do not contribute.
No commenting, no posting, no messaging other users = website ban, while your drooling retards get to take as many free shots as they like.
Sounds pretty communistic of you. Some people earned their points, you just want them handed to you.
I know the average voat argument is pretty weak, but you need to set out on the hard path of self-respect.
You're like a fatty on tumblr. You know nothing of self-respect, because if you had any, you'd contribute enough to do the things you want to do, instead of whining and trying to change the game to suit your lazy lifestyle.
Pathetic. Define 'contribution' in your eyes, define 'earning points'. CCP crudely measures popularity in a first-past-the-post manner. On a website where Islamophobia, racism and fellating Trump dominate people cannot speak plainly in opposition without censorship - there is no way to for them to 'earn' CCP without censoring themselves. Anyway, you know all this, and my comments are better spent elsewhere.
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
Pathetic. Define 'contribution' in your eyes, define 'earning points'.
Contributing content or information to the website in a way that people appreciate and accept, and reward you points for doing.
CCP crudely measures popularity in a first-past-the-post manner.
No. It measures exactly what I stated above.
On a website where Islamophobia, racism and fellating Trump dominate people cannot speak plainly in opposition without censorship - there is no way to for them to 'earn' CCP without censoring themselves.
Like a millennial whining at the boss of his first job. "I won't compromise anything to succeed, you bend to my will or I'll complain and cry about it!"
No loss whatsoever for this site.
Anyway, you know all this, and my comments are better spent elsewhere.
Your presence could be at literally any other social media platform, but you come here to post stupid ideas that get downvoats so you can play your passive-aggressive victim card. You are massively unimportant.
Thank you for answering my question. It gives me something to work with apart from your snivelling deflections.
Pathetic. Define 'contribution' in your eyes, define 'earning points'.
Contributing content or information to the website in a way that people appreciate and accept, and reward you points for doing.
CCP crudely measures popularity in a first-past-the-post manner.
No. It measures exactly what I stated above.
Firstly if you gave a crap about free-speech as a principle, you wouldn't make people's right to speak dependent on people's appreciation and acceptance. For someone that holds widely reviled beliefs as you do, I'm guessing you clearly don't want website policy applied in a wider context.
Secondly, have a look through my profile: I think my contributions have been appreciated and accepted, and rewarded with upvotes well over 100 times. I clearly meet your definition of website contribution, but that's not how CCP works is it? Each time a user doesn't like what I say, and decides to downvote me, that reduces my CCP by one. It doesn't matter how many upvotes a user gets, how 'appreciated' they are, if more people dislike them they get censored. You could hardly be more wrong, but clearly a hypocrite like you doesn't care..
By the way,
When I've made my 10 comments for the day, and my censorship kicks in so that I can't comment at all anywhere on voat - I call that a pretty effective website ban. If I was someone who liked to post a lot, I would quickly hit my limit there as well. No commenting, no posting, no messaging other users = website ban...
Your petty insults in response to my explanation are pretty obvious admissions of defeat. So my initial answer to your question
On which website can you actually type out what you want to say and not have to worry about getting banned or shadowbanned?
still stands: not voat.
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
Firstly if you gave a crap about free-speech as a principle, you wouldn't make people's right to speak dependent on people's appreciation and acceptance.
Said like someone wanting unlimited forum slides and spam.
Secondly, have a look through my profile: I think my contributions have been appreciated and accepted, and rewarded with upvotes well over 100 times.
Wow, 100 times in ~100 days. /golfclap
Do you want a fucking cookie for spending a few days posting things people appreciated, and acting like a useful member of society? Do you want a pat on the back for the times you didn't post your lie of a disclaimer?
I clearly meet your definition of website contribution, but that's not how CCP works is it?
Contribute more than you shit, loser. Bernouts would find your philosophy agreeable.
Each time a user doesn't like what I say, and decides to downvote me, that reduces my CCP by one.
Maybe you should try harder. Pretending to contribute != contributing
It doesn't matter how many upvotes a user gets, how 'appreciated' they are, if more people dislike them they get censored.
Sounds like a personal problem.
You could hardly be more wrong, but clearly a hypocrite like you doesn't care..
I don't care. I don't care what somebody nigger-tier reasoning skills thinks of me, either.
Your petty insults in response to my explanation are pretty obvious admissions of defeat. So my initial answer to your question
Delusions of winning don't actually affect reality.
still stands: not voat.
False. You're posting right now. You are not banned.
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
I will downvoat every comment with this in it. The rest of your comment is very obviously a terrible attempt to change your comment so it's not rejected as SPAM.
Disappointing. Only your first sentence approximates a logical counterpoint - the rest is pitiful voat-style insults and cowardly deflection. I guess it's obvious you had nowhere to go from there. I wish I was surprised to see yet another person who preaches at others regarding the possibility of changing their opinions, showing themselves to be such a miserable hypocrite.
I've discussed ways to deal with spam elsewhere, won't bother to go into full details again for you, but other sites begin with captchas rather than groupthink censorship. I would not advocate a sudden upheaval in voat policy: there is a lot of room for improvement and voat could gradually reduce its censorship evaluating any serious problems as they arise. Right now you have no spam problem, and pretty much no dissenting opinions, so the website has no excuses regarding the glaring free speech failures.
Have another disclaimer:
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
Disappointing. Only your first sentence approximates a logical counterpoint
Stopped caring since you're still spamming your copypasta. Not that you're right about that - there were other cogent points to my response, but you're too busy frothing at the mouth to acknowledge them.
I was just writing above to say don't bother this user is just an agitator from ShariaBlowme or whatever, then saw you've already figured the dumb cunt out.
Typical shill tactics, deflect any reasonable questions and pretends to have a working knowledge of the community, whilst only wasting time on useless arguments.
I tried explaining nicely in another thread how his disclaimer made him seem like a faggot, and how to integrate into Voat, but that just increased his faggotry.
I quite like this example of how the Voat immune system works and is continuing to foster quality users.
Ask him how he likes that our "racist broke circlejerk" is only growing in popularity...his main comeback is that we aren't going to attract advertisers and we are broke....nigger please, guy has no clue what he is talking about.
I wouldn't even notice if it wasn't for that ridiculous disclaimer. You have to be seriously retarded to not understand the point of the 100CCP minimum and how easy it is to not be limited by being a quality user.
But yeah, I'd say most of the community will come to the same conclusions as quite a few of us already have, he'll leave soon enough.
view the rest of the comments →
Crensch ago
@RightHandOfTheGoat
See how that works with these faggots? "I'm tired of X" -> "Why don't you talk to them" -> "X is just as bad as Y" He 100% rejected your suggesting of talking with us despite the extremely hospitable way you phrased everything for him.
The above is not an argument, it's an absurdity. Voaters are just as bad as the leftist cucks on rEddit? Really? On which website can you actually type out what you want to say and not have to worry about getting banned or shadowbanned?
Faggots like this don't even attempt to put some kind of reason into their words, they just make assertions and play their sad song while making false-equivalence fallacies.
@bagano1
Maybe instead of playing this passive-aggressive footsie with people that don't see you for what you are, you could sack up and sound off like you've got a pair. You might even wind up changing someone's mind instead of breeding utter contempt for acting like a fucking kike.
smallpond ago
You seem fond of labelling inconvenient truths absurdities. You have so many people on here drowning in truly impressive levels of stupidity.. who are reduced to reflexively screaming vacuous voat catchphrases as pitiful cries for approval.
Not this one. Those passionate Hillary supporters and many others can't freely express their opinions without suffering CCP restrictions, which equate to periodic website bans. Free speech just for you and yours is not free speech: but we've already established that you're happy to ignore your own hypocrisy.
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
Crensch ago
You seem to post a lot of absurdities.
Projecting rEddit onto Voat really doesn't work well. Projecting your own faults onto others is kinda the same.
Not bans.
No, they don't.
There is no hypocrisy. You're making false-equivalencies and strutting around as if you've won.
Oh, you're sanegoat. Who'dathunkit?
smallpond ago
Well done, are you a politician in real life? Deny everything and run away..
When I've made my 10 comments for the day, and my censorship kicks in so that I can't comment at all anywhere on voat - I call that a pretty effective website ban. If I was someone who liked to post a lot, I would quickly hit my limit there as well. No commenting, no posting, no messaging other users = website ban, while your drooling retards get to take as many free shots as they like. I know the average voat argument is pretty weak, but you need to set out on the hard path of self-respect.
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
Crensch ago
Does empty rhetoric work where you're from?
What have I run from?
I call it the consequences of not contributing anything, and then when you're not able to do what others are, whining about how society isn't fair. It's not exactly difficult to build up positive ccp.
Admission that you do not contribute.
Sounds pretty communistic of you. Some people earned their points, you just want them handed to you.
You're like a fatty on tumblr. You know nothing of self-respect, because if you had any, you'd contribute enough to do the things you want to do, instead of whining and trying to change the game to suit your lazy lifestyle.
smallpond ago
Pathetic. Define 'contribution' in your eyes, define 'earning points'. CCP crudely measures popularity in a first-past-the-post manner. On a website where Islamophobia, racism and fellating Trump dominate people cannot speak plainly in opposition without censorship - there is no way to for them to 'earn' CCP without censoring themselves. Anyway, you know all this, and my comments are better spent elsewhere.
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
Crensch ago
Contributing content or information to the website in a way that people appreciate and accept, and reward you points for doing.
No. It measures exactly what I stated above.
Like a millennial whining at the boss of his first job. "I won't compromise anything to succeed, you bend to my will or I'll complain and cry about it!"
No loss whatsoever for this site.
Your presence could be at literally any other social media platform, but you come here to post stupid ideas that get downvoats so you can play your passive-aggressive victim card. You are massively unimportant.
smallpond ago
Thank you for answering my question. It gives me something to work with apart from your snivelling deflections.
Firstly if you gave a crap about free-speech as a principle, you wouldn't make people's right to speak dependent on people's appreciation and acceptance. For someone that holds widely reviled beliefs as you do, I'm guessing you clearly don't want website policy applied in a wider context.
Secondly, have a look through my profile: I think my contributions have been appreciated and accepted, and rewarded with upvotes well over 100 times. I clearly meet your definition of website contribution, but that's not how CCP works is it? Each time a user doesn't like what I say, and decides to downvote me, that reduces my CCP by one. It doesn't matter how many upvotes a user gets, how 'appreciated' they are, if more people dislike them they get censored. You could hardly be more wrong, but clearly a hypocrite like you doesn't care..
By the way,
Your petty insults in response to my explanation are pretty obvious admissions of defeat. So my initial answer to your question
still stands: not voat.
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
Crensch ago
Said like someone wanting unlimited forum slides and spam.
Wow, 100 times in ~100 days. /golfclap
Do you want a fucking cookie for spending a few days posting things people appreciated, and acting like a useful member of society? Do you want a pat on the back for the times you didn't post your lie of a disclaimer?
Contribute more than you shit, loser. Bernouts would find your philosophy agreeable.
Maybe you should try harder. Pretending to contribute != contributing
Sounds like a personal problem.
I don't care. I don't care what somebody nigger-tier reasoning skills thinks of me, either.
Delusions of winning don't actually affect reality.
False. You're posting right now. You are not banned.
I will downvoat every comment with this in it. The rest of your comment is very obviously a terrible attempt to change your comment so it's not rejected as SPAM.
smallpond ago
Disappointing. Only your first sentence approximates a logical counterpoint - the rest is pitiful voat-style insults and cowardly deflection. I guess it's obvious you had nowhere to go from there. I wish I was surprised to see yet another person who preaches at others regarding the possibility of changing their opinions, showing themselves to be such a miserable hypocrite.
I've discussed ways to deal with spam elsewhere, won't bother to go into full details again for you, but other sites begin with captchas rather than groupthink censorship. I would not advocate a sudden upheaval in voat policy: there is a lot of room for improvement and voat could gradually reduce its censorship evaluating any serious problems as they arise. Right now you have no spam problem, and pretty much no dissenting opinions, so the website has no excuses regarding the glaring free speech failures.
Have another disclaimer:
Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because my views are unpopular here I have less than 100 CCP, and am temporarily banned as soon as I make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech. Don’t be a hypocrite and pretend that it does.
Crensch ago
Stopped caring since you're still spamming your copypasta. Not that you're right about that - there were other cogent points to my response, but you're too busy frothing at the mouth to acknowledge them.
Goater ago
I was just writing above to say don't bother this user is just an agitator from ShariaBlowme or whatever, then saw you've already figured the dumb cunt out.
Typical shill tactics, deflect any reasonable questions and pretends to have a working knowledge of the community, whilst only wasting time on useless arguments.
I tried explaining nicely in another thread how his disclaimer made him seem like a faggot, and how to integrate into Voat, but that just increased his faggotry.
I quite like this example of how the Voat immune system works and is continuing to foster quality users.
Ask him how he likes that our "racist broke circlejerk" is only growing in popularity...his main comeback is that we aren't going to attract advertisers and we are broke....nigger please, guy has no clue what he is talking about.
I wouldn't even notice if it wasn't for that ridiculous disclaimer. You have to be seriously retarded to not understand the point of the 100CCP minimum and how easy it is to not be limited by being a quality user.
But yeah, I'd say most of the community will come to the same conclusions as quite a few of us already have, he'll leave soon enough.