You seem confused - you're the hypocritical censorship-loving tool. I'm here arguing against it. The information content in your posts really shows your character.
If you think you're more enlightened than me, feel free to explain why rather than resorting to brainless insults again. Otherwise, you can fuck off and enjoy your hypocritical safe-space for racists and sexists - a coward like you won't get in trouble for talking to the wrong people.
Sure, if that's really what you think is worthwhile... I think it's worthwhile to direct my efforts towards one-sided circlejerks that are screaming out for a speck of logic or contrast, which clearly kills my CCP. Voat thanks me for my input my throttling my free speech via CCP restrictions. Mentioning this just attracts more downvotes, and weak excuses/diversions like yours. The hypocrisy/doublethink around here is a work of art.
You should check my posting history -- it's pretty centrist (read: Much further left than most of voat)
Oh, so you're extreme right wing by normal standards? Your post history is boring: you occasionally, politely inject a little sense into discussions but also post a lot of inoffensive buffer comments that mean your CCP is healthy. I didn't see you trying to inject any sense into this circlejerk for acquired brain injuries. Scared of speaking to certain people here on voat to avoid the hit to your precious internet points?
I shouldn't have to grovel for 100CCP by posting wads of inoffensive chitchat. Voat is a safespace built on CCP-restriction censorship, and you sound like just another miserable hypocrite.
I swear sanegoatiswear is the king of trolls. Has he ever gone to other sites or seeked out a new free speech platform? Does he tell his story on another site? I think he gets the most satisfying reactions and triggers here.
Yep, nature of the beast I'm afraid. Its why I don't downvote anything. I can read spam and what I think are bullshit opinions without having to downvote what I don't like.
I think it's funny how he finds the concept of us downvoating him because he's an annoying shitstain so goddamn outlandish that he has to come up with these conspiracy theories. Can he seriously not tell that we don't want him here?
That is a little scary. If I were to upvote Sane once (because I usually vote on content rather than user so once in a blue moon he could say something cogent) I could get banned. That's a bit of a landmine to not tell any of us about.
If there is ever and issue with spam vs fairness to the user I'm always going to side with fairness to the user. If there are technical ways to suppress spam that's great. If within the constraint of being fair to the user we can't find one, then oh well.
Well, I upvote sane every time he says something even potentially relevant or somehow worthwhile, and I've not been banned yet. On the other hand I do downvote all his spam and any blatant attacks that I consider unfounded, so it might all balance out.
Big difference is your account activity vs bot/duplicate account(s) that harvest SCP & CCP in dedicated subverses, think subverse members only upvoting one another in their playpen suberse then only upvoating posts and comments of certain users outside the playpen. Putt has said that is what is being dealt with.
Yeah I hate to defend him but I highly doubt that he's been doing that. Hasn't traditionally been his MO. And how hard is it for someone else that's been gaining legitimacy from sanegoat hate to do that to rile up the troops.
That happened on his original account, so it was most likely him. Usually he doesn't do this, that's true, otherwise it would be impossible for him to fish for sympathy from other users.
Edit: Ok, I get it now. It could be anybody.
i =/= l
I thought it was his original account and he had deleted his earlier comments. I stand corrected. This shit is confusing as hell.
Now, what I don't get are the 1+ year old accounts crying fowl.
I think some have been bought
I tend to agree on this point. I have noticed some of the older users from back when I first joined (prior to this account) seem to behave differently. Some have flat out switch position dramatically on a few issues. I remember one was called out on it (not by sane) and failed to provide an explanation.. that user is now on sane's list of shills, presumably over a different conversation. While I don't condone sane's activity, point 100 fingers and your bound to get one right.
I hate sanegoat and would be glad to see him gone but most of the people here have gone retarded. Good users that I used to trust somehow being too dumb to realize the same people behind the sanegoat account are using the witch-hunt to generate a following and pretending to be good faith users.
Have fun reaping what you sow after you all upvoat and blindly trust every 1 month old account because they spend all their time attacking sanegoat. Maybe next time they'll go after regular users instead of one of their own accounts.
Illegal (Voat Rule)
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Dox (Voat Rule)
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
SaneGoat is breaking rule 1. I feel comfortable that stopping spam is essential to a functional forum, and I feel our admin is very generous about warning before enforcing the rule.
Which one(s) would you change or eliminate, and why?
So you're not going to explain your position and instead will stick to calling people retards, accuse people of witch-hunting, call them dumb, all while expecting them to listen to you? Good luck convincing us why we shouldn't ban spammers.
The last thing I want to see is someone getting banned, but when you break clearly listed spam rules, get called out for obvious voting manipulations, and you STILL get only warnings from the Admin, you know you're in the right place. SaneGoat has every opportunity to not get banned, but I doubt s/he will listen.
smallpond ago
You seem confused - you're the hypocritical censorship-loving tool. I'm here arguing against it. The information content in your posts really shows your character.
smallpond ago
If you think you're more enlightened than me, feel free to explain why rather than resorting to brainless insults again. Otherwise, you can fuck off and enjoy your hypocritical safe-space for racists and sexists - a coward like you won't get in trouble for talking to the wrong people.
smallpond ago
Sure, if that's really what you think is worthwhile... I think it's worthwhile to direct my efforts towards one-sided circlejerks that are screaming out for a speck of logic or contrast, which clearly kills my CCP. Voat thanks me for my input my throttling my free speech via CCP restrictions. Mentioning this just attracts more downvotes, and weak excuses/diversions like yours. The hypocrisy/doublethink around here is a work of art.
smallpond ago
Oh, so you're extreme right wing by normal standards? Your post history is boring: you occasionally, politely inject a little sense into discussions but also post a lot of inoffensive buffer comments that mean your CCP is healthy. I didn't see you trying to inject any sense into this circlejerk for acquired brain injuries. Scared of speaking to certain people here on voat to avoid the hit to your precious internet points?
I shouldn't have to grovel for 100CCP by posting wads of inoffensive chitchat. Voat is a safespace built on CCP-restriction censorship, and you sound like just another miserable hypocrite.
FuckSaneGoatISwear ago
https://voat.co/v/whatever/1740948
AmaleksHairyAss ago
That's not why I love him. I love him because he supports real freedom of speech.
RumpRangerRick ago
KYS.
PVT ago
what
Abelekene ago
It's a great sites, I'm so happy to be here
Chimaira92 ago
Honestly, this feels like fake drama bullshit to introduce censorship....
smallpond ago
Voat gags people who don't have hivemind ideology via CCP restrictions - being insane is no problem as long as you don't produce critical discourse.
SelfReferenceParadox ago
I'm a unicorn.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
I swear sanegoatiswear is the king of trolls. Has he ever gone to other sites or seeked out a new free speech platform? Does he tell his story on another site? I think he gets the most satisfying reactions and triggers here.
Gamio ago
You need to ensure no ones voice, sane or insane, carries more undue weight than the next.
smallpond ago
Oh, of course, as long as all those equal voices agree with voat's hivemind, otherwise they get the crap censored out of them via CCP restrictions.
Gamio ago
Yep, nature of the beast I'm afraid. Its why I don't downvote anything. I can read spam and what I think are bullshit opinions without having to downvote what I don't like.
thellama01 ago
where do we go.
Kal ago
All hail king of the shit pile!
Don't ban me plz I just joke around. You're a cunt though. jk
TimberWolfAlpha ago
FINISH HIM[/Mortal Kombat]
whisky_cat ago
Might as well jam to the Soundtrack regardless of opinions.
ginganinja ago
I think it's funny how he finds the concept of us downvoating him because he's an annoying shitstain so goddamn outlandish that he has to come up with these conspiracy theories. Can he seriously not tell that we don't want him here?
bikergang_accountant ago
That is a little scary. If I were to upvote Sane once (because I usually vote on content rather than user so once in a blue moon he could say something cogent) I could get banned. That's a bit of a landmine to not tell any of us about.
If there is ever and issue with spam vs fairness to the user I'm always going to side with fairness to the user. If there are technical ways to suppress spam that's great. If within the constraint of being fair to the user we can't find one, then oh well.
Voat used to be a jungle, and we survived.
Fambida ago
Well, I upvote sane every time he says something even potentially relevant or somehow worthwhile, and I've not been banned yet. On the other hand I do downvote all his spam and any blatant attacks that I consider unfounded, so it might all balance out.
Gamio ago
Big difference is your account activity vs bot/duplicate account(s) that harvest SCP & CCP in dedicated subverses, think subverse members only upvoting one another in their playpen suberse then only upvoating posts and comments of certain users outside the playpen. Putt has said that is what is being dealt with.
SaneGoatISwear9 ago
The sole thing sanegoat came up with which was actually funny.
SaneGoatISwear9 ago
Just for the record, this account isn't sanegoat's. I noticed he forgot to create 9 when he was creating his little herd of sanegoats.
99 is mine too.
@grifter42 aka sanegoat noticed this immediately; coz "capitalization and commas and punctuation."
I bet he really looked into his XLS where he keeps his passwords, accounts and bookmarks, and kicked himself when he realized he skipped a digit.
Fambida ago
I'm reasonably, although not 100%, sure that Grifter is not a SpamGoat alt. In my interactions with him he's seemed, well, sane.
Grifter42 ago
You retards can shout that till you're blue in the face, but it won't make it true.
It just shows you're pushing an agenda.
SaneGoatISwear9 ago
Fuck off back to reddit and take @henrycorp with you.
Plant_Boy ago
What was with linking henrycorp again? Was he pushing for bans and edits as well?
Tipman79 ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! LMFAO!!!!!
Grifter42 ago
Yup. These retards who spend all their time shitting on Sane distract from the actual issues, and are obviously vote farming.
The year old accounts making shill-like comments has puzzled me too, but I just chock it up to bought accounts.
Tipman79 ago
Here'a a Sanegoat alt everyone.
Grifter42 ago
Here's a shill.
I'm gonna go jerk off and take a nap, but you faggots can do what you like.
SaneGoatISwear9 ago
Fuck off back to reddit and take @sanegoatiswear with you.
Tipman79 ago
Hahahahaha! Oh Sane, you so funny!
0iamlordeyayaya0 ago
Yeah I hate to defend him but I highly doubt that he's been doing that. Hasn't traditionally been his MO. And how hard is it for someone else that's been gaining legitimacy from sanegoat hate to do that to rile up the troops.
3dk ago
That happened on his original account, so it was most likely him. Usually he doesn't do this, that's true, otherwise it would be impossible for him to fish for sympathy from other users.Edit: Ok, I get it now. It could be anybody.
i =/= l
I thought it was his original account and he had deleted his earlier comments. I stand corrected. This shit is confusing as hell.
0iamlordeyayaya0 ago
No it didn't happen on his original account. I don't think he's ever hyperlinked
anythingimages.Nevermind your weird logic saying he's spammed those images then in the next comment saying he usually doesn't do that to stay sympathetic.
3dk ago
Try gas lighting harder, faggot.
0iamlordeyayaya0 ago
I think some have been bought, some were sheep in goat's clothing, and some are just dumb and fell for it.
GoBackToReddit ago
I tend to agree on this point. I have noticed some of the older users from back when I first joined (prior to this account) seem to behave differently. Some have flat out switch position dramatically on a few issues. I remember one was called out on it (not by sane) and failed to provide an explanation.. that user is now on sane's list of shills, presumably over a different conversation. While I don't condone sane's activity, point 100 fingers and your bound to get one right.
FaggotBot ago
You only proved you're a faggot, faggot.
Laurentius_the_pyro ago
people attack you because you are vote manipulating scum.
0iamlordeyayaya0 ago
Don't call me a shill and expect sympathy. I just won't automatically elevate anyone who dog piles on you as being beyond reproach for it.
0iamlordeyayaya0 ago
I hate sanegoat and would be glad to see him gone but most of the people here have gone retarded. Good users that I used to trust somehow being too dumb to realize the same people behind the sanegoat account are using the witch-hunt to generate a following and pretending to be good faith users.
Have fun reaping what you sow after you all upvoat and blindly trust every 1 month old account because they spend all their time attacking sanegoat. Maybe next time they'll go after regular users instead of one of their own accounts.
Samsquamch ago
You seem to be upset by one of Voats 3 rules:
SaneGoat is breaking rule 1. I feel comfortable that stopping spam is essential to a functional forum, and I feel our admin is very generous about warning before enforcing the rule.
Which one(s) would you change or eliminate, and why?
0iamlordeyayaya0 ago
You seem to have missed my first sentence.
Laurentius_the_pyro ago
nope it's pretty hard to miss
Samsquamch ago
So you're not going to explain your position and instead will stick to calling people retards, accuse people of witch-hunting, call them dumb, all while expecting them to listen to you? Good luck convincing us why we shouldn't ban spammers.
0iamlordeyayaya0 ago
I think I was pretty clear, not my problem if you're unable or unwilling to read what I said.
Samsquamch ago
No, you weren't. That's why I gave you an opportunity to elaborate.
0iamlordeyayaya0 ago
I don't need to elaborate dipshit. How about you point to where I said anything regarding
HarveyHarveyJones ago
Don't you love what voat is turning into? I'm so 50/50 with sane bit man i'm slowly believing him again.
ShittyAdvice ago
Heil Putt!
Samsquamch ago
FTFY
Samsquamch ago
The last thing I want to see is someone getting banned, but when you break clearly listed spam rules, get called out for obvious voting manipulations, and you STILL get only warnings from the Admin, you know you're in the right place. SaneGoat has every opportunity to not get banned, but I doubt s/he will listen.