So you're arguing that drawings of child porn help children then? Your logic (or lack thereof) is pretty flawed here. Nice attempt at ad hominem though. Enjoy jerking off to drawings of children.
Come onto my property and I'll exercise my God given right to kill you.
Fuckig lol! No no no, you're not angry at all! And i'm the fascist! You're actually totally insane! And a pedophile! Because there's no way you would go this crazy otherwise.
I take back all my claims of you being weak for defending degeneracy. You're not. You ARE the degeneracy, for you are 100% a pedophile!
You are the same kind of pathetic week-ass that says "don't antagonize the Muslims because it will only make them more radical and dangerous!" while we all know what the final solution for Muslims is. And its the same solution for pedos.
You're pissed as hell. But-hurt for being called out for obvious weakness of the mind and being a degenerate in disguise. That's what makes you so angry about some one making a shitpost, calling out pedos. You might wanna take a chill pill pedo! Nobody will kill you....yet!
Ah, so you want to kill people like em eh? Guess that makes you a fascist spiting out fascist logic. Cool, perhaps there are similarities between me and weak leftist pedo enablers like you.
I find it interesting how Voat has such a hard on for seemingly wanting to kill and slaughter at every opportunity, those who were simply born with the attraction to a different age group. Sure, shoot the ones who have actually harmed kids, no argument from me there, but wanting to maim those who haven't done anything is absurd.
M8 I'm saying your personal opinion is retarded although I'd like to hear your reasoning behind it in more detail. Also you just contradicted yourself.
@tanukihat thinks its ok to post CP on voat because "free speech" .And if you debate him on that, you are a danger to voat and free speech because "You want certain speech to be illegal, only speech that you choose, and you lecture me on liberal logic."
Well its not my opinion, but the opinion of the sane majority of the population who aren't kiddy fuckers, you can put a "liberal" label on that, doesn't stop you from being a pedo sympathizer. Anyone who try to post CP under "free speech" should be dealt with accordingly.
Its examples like this that goes to show how fucked this logic can get.
If you look at pedo subs, they all have 1000 subscribers. Plenty of angry pedos on Voat.
And i am tired of these posts:
"Oh, the age of consent is ridiculous when you really think about it, you cant define all people with a single number"
"What do you know about love anyway? Love is not some number"
"Hey, you know, i have this statistics that i pulled out of my ass just know that say 99.9999999% of pedos never actually rape a child, they just stick to masturbating to cartoons"
"LoL, v/RFH isn't even for pedophiles, because those are cartoons!"
This is for all the kiddie fuckers and their friends, FUCKING LITTLE KIDS IS NOT FREE SPEECH! If you think it is man the fuck up and go stand on a soapbox in a park,town square,Ect. and see how fast you get the shit kicked out of you or killed.
What a pathetic generic reply for people who cant make an argument because of their low IQ or a discussion where they know they are the shithead and there is simply no good argument to give.
Why did you even bother replying? just go back to your favorite pedo sub, no one's gonna bother you.
y u mad bro? You know that registered sex offender lists are public, right? What's stopping you from going out and following through with what you talk about? Or are you too much of a bitch?
For starters, there's nothing wrong with a harmless non-offending individual who just wants a community where they can discuss the condition. By rallying against them like this you only drive them deeper into hiding and suppressing their desires until they express them in a far more dangerous way. You are only helping nudge them towards the very behavior for which you call for their execution.
More importantly, however, while voat is a free speech platform, it is not a platform for calls to incite violence, regardless of the target.
For starters, there's nothing wrong with a harmless non-offending individual who just wants a community where they can discuss the condition.
Pedo enabler detected. Die.
By rallying against them like this you only drive them deeper into hiding and suppressing their desires until they express them in a far more dangerous way.
You are a week leftist pussy of this kind that is concerned about the condition of the severely deformed and dangerous. Deport your self to Africa pedo enabling nigger.
Excuse me, one thing I am not is leftist. I am, unlike you, a pragmatist. You must realize that you couldn't ever possible kill every pedophile, or even a significant fraction. So then, the large remainder are driven further and further into hiding, and thereby become progressively more dangerous, and more likely to offend. You're encouraging them to do to others what was done to your sister. Are you happy with that, just because they're not your sister?
If they caught that guy. He would have spent a year in prison and back to the streets. The cop told me that the guy is probably from another country because they are so careful that they will drive all day to another country just to minimise the chances of getting caught by leading the cops on an impossible gose chase. They are already hardcore in hiding. So when you finally find one, you don't put him in the cell for a year. You make sure he never does it again. By gassing him.
And then you push more of them towards offending, just as I said. There are ways to treat them, but they won't come forward and look for treatment as long as they fear death threats from shortsighted folk like yourself on top of being put on the sex offender registry simply for the act of expressing an interest. It's a part of the larger issue with the self-satisfying punitive nature of the modern justice system that encourages repeat offenses instead of integrating criminals back into society as productive non-offending citizens.
Because that worked so well on Christians in Rome..and Japan...and the Ottoman Empire...and France...and China...and India...because none of those places have any Christian presence, right?
In fairness, though, I suspect this quote is talking about war between enemy territories, rather than just murdering people whose desires squick you out.
If by retarded you mean too kool for voat skool than yeah, i'm retarded.
Thank you, 1.1 years ago, i spent 30 minutes trying to come up with a cool username, based on what i plan to post on voat. Your compliment makes it all worth it.
Reeducation definitely, prison yes, but outright killing people no.
They are sick people who need help not a bullet to the head. There is huge difference between child rapists and those who watch animated pedo cartoons, treating them the same I think minimizes the difference between them. You would get more people who end up raping children by making the punishment the same.
Lol, you will "reeducate" a pedo. Fucking lol. That's like saying you will reeducate a underdeveloped child that died at birth. Pedo is a mental deficiency. It cant be cured, it can only be somewhat controlled by some.
They are the same, except one has more fear of prison.
You would get more people who end up raping children by making the punishment the same.
I'm not, but people are psychologists. And they would be the ones working with them.
Well you equated animated pedo videos to child rape, thus I took your comparison as porn videos equals rape. You should be able to see how I made that realation, since you said it deserves the same pushment ergo the crimes are equal. I disagree with the relationship.
And those psychologists would never have the balls to sign their freedom as a guarantee of their successful treatment.
I can fulfill my fantasies without rape or permanent emotional damage to a woman. They cant. Therefore those two types of porn watching is completely different. They watch because they want, but they cant get without destroying the child. Eventually, watching is not enough so they act. And we all wait until its too late, because there might be some of them that will never act.
I would imagine it would be a review panel much like for poral boards. It is honesty likely it is not perfect though
Animated pedos videos do not require or use actual children. That is not really abusing any children. You can make the argument that that it is morally wrong, sure (but what is morality) legally in some areas as well. But yes they could in some way by more inclined to rape children but should you kill them for something they haven't done yet that they might not do?
None of the panel members have any legal consequences if the were wrong.
The reason they watch cartoons isn't because they like cartoons, but because that is the only guarantee that you wont end up in jail.
The law says that pictures can be underage, as long as they aren't nude and sexually suggestive. And a 13 year old posing in a bikini and smiling is apparently not sexual. As you can see, its a highly subjective area, and since posters are always trying to be as suggestive as possible without going over the totally intangible limit, its very risky business. The second form is as young looking as possible while being 18+1 day, but you never really know what you're looking at do you?
That's where the cartoons come in. 9 yearolds in a gangbang? No problem! Because its just a cartooon!!!!!Go to v/RFH and scroll through the first 5 pages, and look at the number of subscribers too.
check the studies done in japan and czech republic, legal child porn reduces child sex abuse rates. cartoon child porn has no victim. when child cartoon porn gets made illegal, more children get raped. you don't have to like that, but that is the bitter truth.
i already do that. but i have a level of self control that most people don't have. people with less impulse control, especially those who are attracted to younger people than i am, need outlets.
Fame it however you want: the bottom line is you are attracted to children. And the more your illness is allowed to develop, the more likely you are to hurt a child someday.
frame it however you want, the bottom line is you are attracted to women. the more your illness is allowed to develop, the more likely you are to hurt a woman someday.
the study results are consistent. increased sexual outlets leads to reduced sexual crime rates. pornography reduces rape rates, child porn reduces child sex abuse rates. you can complain about it, you can suggest people don't check out that type of porn or rape children. but there are no studies done on complaints vs sex abuse rates that i know of. perhaps you should consider doing a study on that? i somehow doubt that complaining is as effective as cartoon porn at reducing the number of victims of child sex abuse.
there is a reason that no fap leads to increased motivation to act. there is a reason that porn leads to decreased motivation to act. when it comes to people that are sexually attracted to children, if you want to protect the children, it is in their best interest for people who are attracted to them to have decreased motivation to act.
Anyone else exclusively hear about CP on voat through chest beaters like this guy?
At least this time they didn't leave a link. If you think you're helping in some sort of war on CP, you're not. You're calling attention to it. Never affects me, don't have to actively avoid it.
I was motivated to make this thread now, by the increasing number of posts made by pedo enablers (actual pedos in disguise).
"Oh, the age of consent is ridiculous when you really think about it, you cant define all people with a single number"
"What do you know about love anyway? Love is not some number"
"Hey, you know, i have this statistics that i pulled out of my ass just know that say 99.9999999% of pedos never actually rape a child, they just stick to masturbating to cartoons"
"LoL, v/RFH isn't even for pedophiles, because those are cartoons!"
"pedos are nice people, they would never rape, they would just go slow and see if the 14 year old is into old dudes. If she is, nothing will happen to her mind later, psychologists are full of shit"
So pedo enablers are pushing their agenda of normalization of pedophilia, whose final goal is legalization of pedophilia". And non pedos need to push that agenda back by calling them out for what they are. Lifeforms deformed from birth, that cant contribute to society, and therefore cant be legal.
Also there is a pedo posting pedo shit in my favorite sub.
"Liberals", you can thank the "Liberals", and Milo, who has been dead set aimed to infiltrate and manipulate any version of the "right" that isn't mainstream.
Translation: censoring CP is a different kind of censorship from regular censorship, because @MightyYetGentle7 gets to decide what is censorship and what isn't.
Voat, are you happy with allowing @MightyYetGentle7 to decide what is and is not censorship? I ain't.
"I want to fuck kids" is not like "I want to kill this person". One is specific. "I want to kill people" is not a death threat. Neither is "I want to kill this person". Death threats should be protected speech except to the extent they comprise extortion.
I heard a rumor one time one place years back cough of some off duty cops doing some off duty detective/sting work which may or may not have resulted in severe beatings upon on duty pedophiles....
Those are my kind of cops. We have the Creep Catchers up here in Canada. They've busted a cop and a principal among others. One trannie killed himself after being confronted, those there is some legitimate controversy behind that one.
go back to Reddit if you can't wipe the shit from your eyes and read a fucking comment. I'm talking about censorship, my concern is that censoring one thing will lead to censoring more thing. Puts the foot in the door of Reddit faggots like yourself to quickly start censoring mere offensive content or dissenting opinions. Kill yourself reddfugee nigger faggot
If you want unrestricted free speech, let them be, they need to exist. Block the users, block the subverses but do not go out of your way to have them banned.
you can never get what you really want without going to jail so basically never
you can't settle for a normal woman because after a lifetime of masturbating to poorly drawn cartoons of 12 year olds, you can't even get it up to a sight of a normal woman
you will therefore never have a wife and kids, and will forever be just a burden on society that needs medical care and a pension, with out creating two new workforce members to replace you
never-ending threat of trying to fulfill you ultimate fantasy when you age enough and realize your life will suck forever as you're just a single basement loli masturbator and therefore have nothing to lose if you get caught.
You really have no idea what you're talking about. It's really funny actually. All this implication around pedos being hamplanet basement dwellers, when they might be attractive younger looking men? You really haven't thought much about this have you?
He probably doesn't. You aren't wrong by any means, there is hypocrisy here and the calls for censorship will be a very slippery slope. I'm in the camp to kill the pedos too but this censorship is off putting as fuck
I'm in the camp to kill the pedos too but this censorship is off putting as fuck
And that's the main premise of this thread. But people cant read, Or are they so shocked by the idea of genocide that their mind automatically stears away from that idea?.......
I ain't no pedo, but the hypocrisy of voaters allowing speech like "I want to hang all niggers and kikes from the highest tree" and not allowing speech like "I would bang that 17-year-old" is not lost on me.
Bad attempt at sophistry. Pedophilia support is not a free speech issue. It isn't really a legal one either. It's a matter of right and wrong and human nature; the things that wrote the fucking laws. That's a whole lot above your shallow all or nothing outlook.
Bullshit, every 18+ year old man alive out there has thought about banging out a 17 year old at one time or another, maybe even a 16 year old. The difference, actual men might have the idea cross their mind, especially when they're enticed by one in public who's dressed provocatively on purpose, but their minds soon come back to reality and realize they really don't even want to fuck her, maybe on some levels, but when it comes right down to it and you think of you sister, your daughter, and how you would feel if they were treated like a fuck-toy. And no man very many years over 17 could tolerate a relationship with a 17 year old or younger for very long, doesn't work.
So your 'I would bang that 17-year-old" being frowned on commentary is wrong. Many of us have thought it, said it, trolled using such commentary online.
The argument isn't against someone making the assertion "Damn that minor is sexually attractive" or "My first instinct is to knock the bottom out of that.", feelings we almost all share at times, the problem is with people who incessantly sexualize minor children through postings of photographs and drawings and call it " free speech"....
But you realize that, you are trying to "muddy the waters" and deflect from the real issue.
Why don't you go meet someone who's been sexually exploited? I mean other than to prey upon the weakened psychological state caused by previous abuse... Seek out young people who were quite happy, intelligent children who had the potential for wonderful futures and being a serious asset to society, only to have their whole psyche destroyed by a or multiple sexual predators.... Sexual predators who loved reading comics like "Chester the Molester" in such "noble" publications as Hustler..... Meet the families of victims of rape, or rape and murder, once again a good bit of them pretty well normal productive members of society until one of their closest loved ones were damaged beyond repair
And just go ahead and pretend indulging in the degeneracy of stimulating yourself sexually with such imagery has no detrimental effect.... No ill effect on the people indulging or often the young girls seeking attention through sexually exploiting themselves to post it online.... Sure. No desensitizing yourself to more deviant, illegal, dangerous antisocial behaviors..... None at all.
Who to say it's not allowed to be discussed . Noone would delete it unless it clearly violated rules. But anyone thinking of doing that knows they will get hate for it. Free to to have an opinion doesn't mean people aren't free to criticize it. This isn't reddit where if things get deleted because mods don't like it. There has to be a reason, Usually things get deleted after breaking a rule within a subverse.
This is what special snowflake liberals fail to realize. They get offended when people criticize their opinions, and want a safe space like reddit where people can pander to them and anybody speaking out gets drowned out.
I do not allow pedophilia. If anyone is to share pictures, real or not, or write specifically implying sick intentions. They should be hung from a tree.
But should pedophilic discussions be automatically censored? No. If that was the case you may as well delete /v/pizzagate
If anyone wants to defend pedophiles, let them, makes them easier to doxx later on. But it is illegal to imply inciting pedophilic actions, or share pictures, and thats what should definitely be censored.
You are telling me that uploading CP onto voat is the same as saying "fuck muslims" . Sorry to burst your bubble, but that there is Liberal logic.
If not stop being illiterate and see where I draw the line between Free Speech and Illegal
And before you say "hurr durr UK" . I dont give a fuck about the UK, Voat is not hosted in the UK,
In Saudi Arabia its illegal to draw Mohammad, I will draw Muhammad if i want to, I don't live there.
Well this thread isn't really about demanding a ban on someone but a public "fuck you". Of course its formulated with up votes to make it clear that its not a fuck you from me, but from many people.
In the end, everyone is a fascist. Its all a mater of how much fascist on a scale of 1/10. Some wanna hang serial killers, some wanna hang niggers, some wanna hang pedos, some wanna hang leftists, some wanna hang j-walkers......some just say the wanna hang nigs/peos/leftist because angry writing relives stress but they wouldn't really do it.
Even nice people are fascist, their just a 1/10 fascist.
Ultimately the anti nigger and anti jew narrative is present because they are seen as a force that will amount to nothing at best, kill people at worst, so whats the point of their existence?
And the anti pedo narrative is the same. Pedos will amount to nothing at best, rape and consequent total destruction of a life at worst, so whats the point of their existence?
What's the point of anyone's existence? I disagree with your existence, for being a Voat-hypocrite. Therefore, there should be a public "fuck you" thread about you, and I should make a serious effort to have you banned from the site. Is that the slope you want to slide down mate? Voat has completely free speech for a reason. Who's next on your hit list, all anime fans? Mediterranean whites? All females? See how quickly this discussion devolves, when you start off the way you did?
My existence will never be damaging to anyone. Like i said, i'm not trying to ban anyone, just giving the one finger salute. Also like i said, everyone is some form of a fascist. If you want to get rid of serial killers, you are being a little fascist, and if you wanna get rid of j-walkers, you're being a ridiculous fascist. No two people will ever agree on where the line should be drawn.
But most people could probably agree that it should be somewhere around the point at witch someone is "damaging" to society. And pedophiles are ether damaging to society or non-productive and a constant threat to becoming damaging to society.
Disagree, your existence is damaging to Voat, because I disagree with your position on free speech. I think that allowing you to continue down this path will lead you to attempting to control the speech of multiple subverses that you disagree with, even those not pedo-related. Therefore, you should be brigaded by ProtectVoat and eventually stripped and banned from the site.
ExpertShitposter ago
She must have not reached the age of 9 yet. You are a walking human deformity. Gas is the only way.
ExpertShitposter ago
And then when your wife gives you children you molest them. Nope, you still must be gassed.
0rion ago
Okay then PedoPrime. I hope we meet in real life some day.
0rion ago
So you're arguing that drawings of child porn help children then? Your logic (or lack thereof) is pretty flawed here. Nice attempt at ad hominem though. Enjoy jerking off to drawings of children.
LinoleumFulcrum ago
ExpertShitposter is living up to her name.
ExpertShitposter ago
Fuckig lol! No no no, you're not angry at all! And i'm the fascist! You're actually totally insane! And a pedophile! Because there's no way you would go this crazy otherwise.
I take back all my claims of you being weak for defending degeneracy. You're not. You ARE the degeneracy, for you are 100% a pedophile!
ExpertShitposter ago
You are the same kind of pathetic week-ass that says "don't antagonize the Muslims because it will only make them more radical and dangerous!" while we all know what the final solution for Muslims is. And its the same solution for pedos.
You're pissed as hell. But-hurt for being called out for obvious weakness of the mind and being a degenerate in disguise. That's what makes you so angry about some one making a shitpost, calling out pedos. You might wanna take a chill pill pedo! Nobody will kill you....yet!
ExpertShitposter ago
No, we start with threats to society such as pedos, and then figure out what to do with pedo enablers if not pedos in disguise such as yourself.
You're the one who sounds angry and out of control. I am perfectly calm in my rhetoric.
ExpertShitposter ago
Defense of mentally deformed = weak leftist.
I just want to build a clean world, free of degeneracy. Heil Hitler.
ExpertShitposter ago
Ah, so you want to kill people like em eh? Guess that makes you a fascist spiting out fascist logic. Cool, perhaps there are similarities between me and weak leftist pedo enablers like you.
ExpertShitposter ago
Kill all pedos = 0 kids abused. You cant beat fascist logic! :D
ExpertShitposter ago
Oh look, another pedo enabler.
A6-EGO ago
I find it interesting how Voat has such a hard on for seemingly wanting to kill and slaughter at every opportunity, those who were simply born with the attraction to a different age group. Sure, shoot the ones who have actually harmed kids, no argument from me there, but wanting to maim those who haven't done anything is absurd.
ExpertShitposter ago
Killing is the new black.
cointelpro_shill ago
good shit! I'd like to hear the raw vocals.. where's my pipe ...
cointelpro_shill ago
shut up bitch I'm watching hannah montana
ElectroGypsy ago
So when this post was first made there was people up voting when it was at 1.
ExpertShitposter ago
Nope, i just checked the profile of the 3 known pedos that posted to my favorite sub. Know your enemy. Also, not gonna accuse people without evidence.
leaffur ago
M8 I'm saying your personal opinion is retarded although I'd like to hear your reasoning behind it in more detail. Also you just contradicted yourself.
slickleg64 ago
@tanukihat thinks its ok to post CP on voat because "free speech" .And if you debate him on that, you are a danger to voat and free speech because "You want certain speech to be illegal, only speech that you choose, and you lecture me on liberal logic."
Well its not my opinion, but the opinion of the sane majority of the population who aren't kiddy fuckers, you can put a "liberal" label on that, doesn't stop you from being a pedo sympathizer. Anyone who try to post CP under "free speech" should be dealt with accordingly.
Its examples like this that goes to show how fucked this logic can get.
Runaway-White-Slave ago
Agreed, must covertly dox and GENOCIDE the pedos!!! Please Pedos Post MOAR!!!!!!!!!!!
slickleg64 ago
This needs more upvoats.
leaffur ago
Straight up retarded. Way to completely sabotage your own argument by being a fucking idiot.
ExpertShitposter ago
If you look at pedo subs, they all have 1000 subscribers. Plenty of angry pedos on Voat.
And i am tired of these posts:
"Oh, the age of consent is ridiculous when you really think about it, you cant define all people with a single number"
"What do you know about love anyway? Love is not some number"
"Hey, you know, i have this statistics that i pulled out of my ass just know that say 99.9999999% of pedos never actually rape a child, they just stick to masturbating to cartoons"
"LoL, v/RFH isn't even for pedophiles, because those are cartoons!"
ExpertShitposter ago
Fuck off i have 9300 CCP
AmaleksHairyAss ago
Fuck censorship and fuck you, OP.
ExpertShitposter ago
What censorship are you talking about azzhole?
AmaleksHairyAss ago
Firstly, I am a complete ass.
Secondly, this bitching about pedos is a thin disguise for the desire to censor legal speech from pedos.
ExpertShitposter ago
Read the post. Its an open desire to genocide them.
AmaleksHairyAss ago
Fuck you for wanting to create a thought crime and for promoting genocide.
ExpertShitposter ago
Oh yeah? Whats your stake in it? Be honest, its the internet and you're anonimus.
AmaleksHairyAss ago
I'll be honest but you won't believe me.
I care about children. I want child abuse to be stopped. And I recognize that blind hatred will not accomplish this.
ExpertShitposter ago
Hatred of weakness and birth defects is the key to the success and prosperity of the human race. And pedo is birth deflect.
LaLlorona ago
Death to pedos ! Fuck whoever disagrees
ExpertShitposter ago
Could be a law.
swinston79 ago
This is for all the kiddie fuckers and their friends, FUCKING LITTLE KIDS IS NOT FREE SPEECH! If you think it is man the fuck up and go stand on a soapbox in a park,town square,Ect. and see how fast you get the shit kicked out of you or killed.
DiscontentedMajority ago
But that takes us back to where is the line. Would a sexualized image of a 17 year old be removed?
leaffur ago
Someone is a salty bitch...
ExpertShitposter ago
Some one is a pedo in disguise....
Die pedo.
leaffur ago
You're just a repressed pedophile unable to come to terms with your own attraction to young children, lashing out in an attempt to redeem yourself.
ExpertShitposter ago
What a pathetic generic reply for people who cant make an argument because of their low IQ or a discussion where they know they are the shithead and there is simply no good argument to give.
Why did you even bother replying? just go back to your favorite pedo sub, no one's gonna bother you.
leaffur ago
You're so good at shitposting, I love it. Like an expert or something.
Why bother replying? I knew it would trigger you.
ExpertShitposter ago
"Haha, i was just le troling u, i'm not real pedo, it was a le trole"
leaffur ago
y u mad bro? You know that registered sex offender lists are public, right? What's stopping you from going out and following through with what you talk about? Or are you too much of a bitch?
ExpertShitposter ago
How about....ummm.....i don't want life sentence?
leaffur ago
So what you're saying is you're not good enough to not get caught.
ExpertShitposter ago
Not interested in talking to pedos. Not what the thread was about. Wont reply to you again.
leaffur ago
Bet.
DiscontentedMajority ago
So where is the line where it's ok?
parcelsus ago
For starters, there's nothing wrong with a harmless non-offending individual who just wants a community where they can discuss the condition. By rallying against them like this you only drive them deeper into hiding and suppressing their desires until they express them in a far more dangerous way. You are only helping nudge them towards the very behavior for which you call for their execution.
More importantly, however, while voat is a free speech platform, it is not a platform for calls to incite violence, regardless of the target.
ExpertShitposter ago
Pedo enabler detected. Die.
You are a week leftist pussy of this kind that is concerned about the condition of the severely deformed and dangerous. Deport your self to Africa pedo enabling nigger.
parcelsus ago
Excuse me, one thing I am not is leftist. I am, unlike you, a pragmatist. You must realize that you couldn't ever possible kill every pedophile, or even a significant fraction. So then, the large remainder are driven further and further into hiding, and thereby become progressively more dangerous, and more likely to offend. You're encouraging them to do to others what was done to your sister. Are you happy with that, just because they're not your sister?
ExpertShitposter ago
If they caught that guy. He would have spent a year in prison and back to the streets. The cop told me that the guy is probably from another country because they are so careful that they will drive all day to another country just to minimise the chances of getting caught by leading the cops on an impossible gose chase. They are already hardcore in hiding. So when you finally find one, you don't put him in the cell for a year. You make sure he never does it again. By gassing him.
parcelsus ago
And then you push more of them towards offending, just as I said. There are ways to treat them, but they won't come forward and look for treatment as long as they fear death threats from shortsighted folk like yourself on top of being put on the sex offender registry simply for the act of expressing an interest. It's a part of the larger issue with the self-satisfying punitive nature of the modern justice system that encourages repeat offenses instead of integrating criminals back into society as productive non-offending citizens.
ExpertShitposter ago
https://i.sli.mg/QRWTSK.jpg
parcelsus ago
Because that worked so well on Christians in Rome..and Japan...and the Ottoman Empire...and France...and China...and India...because none of those places have any Christian presence, right? In fairness, though, I suspect this quote is talking about war between enemy territories, rather than just murdering people whose desires squick you out.
ExpertShitposter ago
Is your place in the world to shitpost an opinion? Just try it its relaxing!
Kill all pedophiles.......weeeeeeee, pedo corpses flowing down a river of their own blood...wheeeeeeeee.
revofire ago
You're retarded. Also I like your name. Somehow no one else recognizes this.
ExpertShitposter ago
If by retarded you mean too kool for voat skool than yeah, i'm retarded.
Thank you, 1.1 years ago, i spent 30 minutes trying to come up with a cool username, based on what i plan to post on voat. Your compliment makes it all worth it.
ashekchum ago
Reeducation definitely, prison yes, but outright killing people no.
They are sick people who need help not a bullet to the head. There is huge difference between child rapists and those who watch animated pedo cartoons, treating them the same I think minimizes the difference between them. You would get more people who end up raping children by making the punishment the same.
ExpertShitposter ago
Lol, you will "reeducate" a pedo. Fucking lol. That's like saying you will reeducate a underdeveloped child that died at birth. Pedo is a mental deficiency. It cant be cured, it can only be somewhat controlled by some.
They are the same, except one has more fear of prison.
This is you.
ashekchum ago
Sure, maybe some are beyond help but there are likely some who could be fixed.
And I don't think they are really the same. It's close to saying that if you watch porn you are essentially raping someone.
ExpertShitposter ago
Are you as a psychiatrist, gonna sign papers that say "i guarantee with my freedom that this man is 100% cured of his BIRTH DEFECT"? If not no deal.
Wtf that makes no sense.
ashekchum ago
I'm not, but people are psychologists. And they would be the ones working with them.
Well you equated animated pedo videos to child rape, thus I took your comparison as porn videos equals rape. You should be able to see how I made that realation, since you said it deserves the same pushment ergo the crimes are equal. I disagree with the relationship.
ExpertShitposter ago
And those psychologists would never have the balls to sign their freedom as a guarantee of their successful treatment.
I can fulfill my fantasies without rape or permanent emotional damage to a woman. They cant. Therefore those two types of porn watching is completely different. They watch because they want, but they cant get without destroying the child. Eventually, watching is not enough so they act. And we all wait until its too late, because there might be some of them that will never act.
ashekchum ago
I would imagine it would be a review panel much like for poral boards. It is honesty likely it is not perfect though
Animated pedos videos do not require or use actual children. That is not really abusing any children. You can make the argument that that it is morally wrong, sure (but what is morality) legally in some areas as well. But yes they could in some way by more inclined to rape children but should you kill them for something they haven't done yet that they might not do?
ExpertShitposter ago
None of the panel members have any legal consequences if the were wrong.
The reason they watch cartoons isn't because they like cartoons, but because that is the only guarantee that you wont end up in jail.
The law says that pictures can be underage, as long as they aren't nude and sexually suggestive. And a 13 year old posing in a bikini and smiling is apparently not sexual. As you can see, its a highly subjective area, and since posters are always trying to be as suggestive as possible without going over the totally intangible limit, its very risky business. The second form is as young looking as possible while being 18+1 day, but you never really know what you're looking at do you?
That's where the cartoons come in. 9 yearolds in a gangbang? No problem! Because its just a cartooon!!!!!Go to v/RFH and scroll through the first 5 pages, and look at the number of subscribers too.
Thats not a 100% pure desire for child rape?
0rion ago
Cartoon child porn is the gateway drug to pedophilia.
Boom. Bring on the downvotes pedos.
greycloud ago
check the studies done in japan and czech republic, legal child porn reduces child sex abuse rates. cartoon child porn has no victim. when child cartoon porn gets made illegal, more children get raped. you don't have to like that, but that is the bitter truth.
0rion ago
"Reduces child sex abuse rates"
How about just don't fuck kids in the first place, and conduct oneself as a normal human being?
greycloud ago
i already do that. but i have a level of self control that most people don't have. people with less impulse control, especially those who are attracted to younger people than i am, need outlets.
0rion ago
Fame it however you want: the bottom line is you are attracted to children. And the more your illness is allowed to develop, the more likely you are to hurt a child someday.
greycloud ago
frame it however you want, the bottom line is you are attracted to women. the more your illness is allowed to develop, the more likely you are to hurt a woman someday.
0rion ago
Here, have an upvote for effort. I know this is the best you can do.
greycloud ago
the study results are consistent. increased sexual outlets leads to reduced sexual crime rates. pornography reduces rape rates, child porn reduces child sex abuse rates. you can complain about it, you can suggest people don't check out that type of porn or rape children. but there are no studies done on complaints vs sex abuse rates that i know of. perhaps you should consider doing a study on that? i somehow doubt that complaining is as effective as cartoon porn at reducing the number of victims of child sex abuse.
there is a reason that no fap leads to increased motivation to act. there is a reason that porn leads to decreased motivation to act. when it comes to people that are sexually attracted to children, if you want to protect the children, it is in their best interest for people who are attracted to them to have decreased motivation to act.
0rion ago
TL;DR greycloud is a pedophile.
Runaway-White-Slave ago
Nope, necrophilia, you ignorant corpse raping faggot.
ExpertShitposter ago
Its not a gateway, its a safety procedure for full blown pedos. Youre 100% legal anywhere, anytime if the girl was drawn.
8Hz_WAN_IP ago
Worthless post that offers nothing of value and is just a cheap grab for internet points.
ExpertShitposter ago
Worthless reply that offers nothing of value and subtlety accuses a 9300+ CCP user of farming upvotes.
Drain0 ago
This isn't about censorship you fucking sick child abuse sympathizers. If you get rid of the garbage there is no more stench.
PsyOp ago
I'm lost. There's a pedophile ring on voat?
slickleg64 ago
pizzavoatgate
ExpertShitposter ago
A big one.
Chiefpacman ago
Anyone else exclusively hear about CP on voat through chest beaters like this guy?
At least this time they didn't leave a link. If you think you're helping in some sort of war on CP, you're not. You're calling attention to it. Never affects me, don't have to actively avoid it.
ExpertShitposter ago
I was motivated to make this thread now, by the increasing number of posts made by pedo enablers (actual pedos in disguise).
"Oh, the age of consent is ridiculous when you really think about it, you cant define all people with a single number"
"What do you know about love anyway? Love is not some number"
"Hey, you know, i have this statistics that i pulled out of my ass just know that say 99.9999999% of pedos never actually rape a child, they just stick to masturbating to cartoons"
"LoL, v/RFH isn't even for pedophiles, because those are cartoons!"
"pedos are nice people, they would never rape, they would just go slow and see if the 14 year old is into old dudes. If she is, nothing will happen to her mind later, psychologists are full of shit"
So pedo enablers are pushing their agenda of normalization of pedophilia, whose final goal is legalization of pedophilia". And non pedos need to push that agenda back by calling them out for what they are. Lifeforms deformed from birth, that cant contribute to society, and therefore cant be legal.
Also there is a pedo posting pedo shit in my favorite sub.
Runaway-White-Slave ago
"Liberals", you can thank the "Liberals", and Milo, who has been dead set aimed to infiltrate and manipulate any version of the "right" that isn't mainstream.
Redditsdead ago
That's one of Hechos alts. One he tries to be respectable with. His goal is to normalize pedophilia.
tanukihat ago
Translation: censoring CP is a different kind of censorship from regular censorship, because @MightyYetGentle7 gets to decide what is censorship and what isn't.
Voat, are you happy with allowing @MightyYetGentle7 to decide what is and is not censorship? I ain't.
antiliberalsociety ago
Apparently pedophilia is protected by free speech
slickleg64 ago
Liberals fail to realize that if someone says "I want to fuck kids" it raises as many red flags as "I want to kill this person"
Waiting for a liberal to argue that death threats should be protected under free speech.
AmaleksHairyAss ago
"I want to fuck kids" is not like "I want to kill this person". One is specific. "I want to kill people" is not a death threat. Neither is "I want to kill this person". Death threats should be protected speech except to the extent they comprise extortion.
Redditsdead ago
That only protects from government interference. Put Hecho in front of me and I'd pull the trigger.
antiliberalsociety ago
I heard a rumor one time one place years back cough of some off duty cops doing some off duty detective/sting work which may or may not have resulted in severe beatings upon on duty pedophiles....
Redditsdead ago
Those are my kind of cops. We have the Creep Catchers up here in Canada. They've busted a cop and a principal among others. One trannie killed himself after being confronted, those there is some legitimate controversy behind that one.
Aged ago
Ladies and Gentlemen, Internet Tough Guy.
LaLlorona ago
Die pedo!
Drain0 ago
Ladies and Gentlemen, another Hencho alt.
ExpertShitposter ago
And main contributor to v/youngladies .
Redditsdead ago
I stand by what I said. I can't and have nothing to prove to you, so, well, peace. It's not like you're adding anything to the conversation.
ExpertShitposter ago
Aged is main poster in v/youngladies . Just so you know who you're talking to.
Redditsdead ago
Ah, so probably one of hechos alts, or butt buddy.
jerry ago
go back to Reddit if you can't wipe the shit from your eyes and read a fucking comment. I'm talking about censorship, my concern is that censoring one thing will lead to censoring more thing. Puts the foot in the door of Reddit faggots like yourself to quickly start censoring mere offensive content or dissenting opinions. Kill yourself reddfugee nigger faggot
alalzia ago
For posting in defence of Venus di Urbino ?
oh look wikipedia CP
C4H9N3O2 ago
I assumed all the creepy pedo shit was just pandering to anime fans.
Not that it couldn't be both causes.
ExpertShitposter ago
Two bombs were not enough.
Sir_Ocaz ago
If you want unrestricted free speech, let them be, they need to exist. Block the users, block the subverses but do not go out of your way to have them banned.
Rainy-Day-Dream ago
banned? I want them killed
antiliberalsociety ago
Can kids block adult advances?
Eualos ago
Only with weapons, which of course are being taken away from all of us. Not much a sheep can do against a wolf, a sheepdog on the other hand...
ExpertShitposter ago
I'm not suggesting censoring their sub. I'm suggesting irl death penalty :)
Redditsdead ago
You must be my soul mate. I've been trying to get Hecho to end it for quite a while now.
ExpertShitposter ago
I don't know why he doesn't.
you can never get what you really want without going to jail so basically never
you can't settle for a normal woman because after a lifetime of masturbating to poorly drawn cartoons of 12 year olds, you can't even get it up to a sight of a normal woman
you will therefore never have a wife and kids, and will forever be just a burden on society that needs medical care and a pension, with out creating two new workforce members to replace you
never-ending threat of trying to fulfill you ultimate fantasy when you age enough and realize your life will suck forever as you're just a single basement loli masturbator and therefore have nothing to lose if you get caught.
leaffur ago
You really have no idea what you're talking about. It's really funny actually. All this implication around pedos being hamplanet basement dwellers, when they might be attractive younger looking men? You really haven't thought much about this have you?
Redditsdead ago
Not to mention what people like us would do to him, given the chance.
tanukihat ago
Do you honestly not see the hypocrisy?
Edit: Well I guess Voat's love affair with "free speech" only extends as far as speech they approve of. Who does that sound like I wonder?
Edit 2: So children 17 years old are OK with you? It's called punching holes in your argument, not muddying the waters :)
jerry ago
He probably doesn't. You aren't wrong by any means, there is hypocrisy here and the calls for censorship will be a very slippery slope. I'm in the camp to kill the pedos too but this censorship is off putting as fuck
ExpertShitposter ago
And that's the main premise of this thread. But people cant read, Or are they so shocked by the idea of genocide that their mind automatically stears away from that idea?.......
tanukihat ago
I ain't no pedo, but the hypocrisy of voaters allowing speech like "I want to hang all niggers and kikes from the highest tree" and not allowing speech like "I would bang that 17-year-old" is not lost on me.
gazillions ago
Bad attempt at sophistry. Pedophilia support is not a free speech issue. It isn't really a legal one either. It's a matter of right and wrong and human nature; the things that wrote the fucking laws. That's a whole lot above your shallow all or nothing outlook.
Runaway-White-Slave ago
Bullshit, every 18+ year old man alive out there has thought about banging out a 17 year old at one time or another, maybe even a 16 year old. The difference, actual men might have the idea cross their mind, especially when they're enticed by one in public who's dressed provocatively on purpose, but their minds soon come back to reality and realize they really don't even want to fuck her, maybe on some levels, but when it comes right down to it and you think of you sister, your daughter, and how you would feel if they were treated like a fuck-toy. And no man very many years over 17 could tolerate a relationship with a 17 year old or younger for very long, doesn't work.
So your 'I would bang that 17-year-old" being frowned on commentary is wrong. Many of us have thought it, said it, trolled using such commentary online.
The argument isn't against someone making the assertion "Damn that minor is sexually attractive" or "My first instinct is to knock the bottom out of that.", feelings we almost all share at times, the problem is with people who incessantly sexualize minor children through postings of photographs and drawings and call it " free speech"....
But you realize that, you are trying to "muddy the waters" and deflect from the real issue.
Why don't you go meet someone who's been sexually exploited? I mean other than to prey upon the weakened psychological state caused by previous abuse... Seek out young people who were quite happy, intelligent children who had the potential for wonderful futures and being a serious asset to society, only to have their whole psyche destroyed by a or multiple sexual predators.... Sexual predators who loved reading comics like "Chester the Molester" in such "noble" publications as Hustler..... Meet the families of victims of rape, or rape and murder, once again a good bit of them pretty well normal productive members of society until one of their closest loved ones were damaged beyond repair
And just go ahead and pretend indulging in the degeneracy of stimulating yourself sexually with such imagery has no detrimental effect.... No ill effect on the people indulging or often the young girls seeking attention through sexually exploiting themselves to post it online.... Sure. No desensitizing yourself to more deviant, illegal, dangerous antisocial behaviors..... None at all.
Here let's hear from an expert.
slickleg64 ago
Who to say it's not allowed to be discussed . Noone would delete it unless it clearly violated rules. But anyone thinking of doing that knows they will get hate for it. Free to to have an opinion doesn't mean people aren't free to criticize it. This isn't reddit where if things get deleted because mods don't like it. There has to be a reason, Usually things get deleted after breaking a rule within a subverse. This is what special snowflake liberals fail to realize. They get offended when people criticize their opinions, and want a safe space like reddit where people can pander to them and anybody speaking out gets drowned out.
tanukihat ago
So do you allow or not allow pedophilia?
slickleg64 ago
I do not allow pedophilia. If anyone is to share pictures, real or not, or write specifically implying sick intentions. They should be hung from a tree.
But should pedophilic discussions be automatically censored? No. If that was the case you may as well delete /v/pizzagate
If anyone wants to defend pedophiles, let them, makes them easier to doxx later on. But it is illegal to imply inciting pedophilic actions, or share pictures, and thats what should definitely be censored.
tanukihat ago
It's illegal to say "Fuck muslims" in the UK. Do you support that too?
slickleg64 ago
No . Fuck Muslims
tanukihat ago
You can't support some speech and not others. Either you're for free speech or not. Otherwise you're using Liberal Logic and trolling yourself.
slickleg64 ago
You are telling me that uploading CP onto voat is the same as saying "fuck muslims" . Sorry to burst your bubble, but that there is Liberal logic.
If not stop being illiterate and see where I draw the line between Free Speech and Illegal
And before you say "hurr durr UK" . I dont give a fuck about the UK, Voat is not hosted in the UK, In Saudi Arabia its illegal to draw Mohammad, I will draw Muhammad if i want to, I don't live there.
tanukihat ago
You want certain speech to be illegal, only speech that you choose, and you lecture me on liberal logic.
You're a danger to Voat.
slickleg64 ago
You want it to be okay to post CP on Voat. Youre a danger to voat.
LlamaMan ago
For the record pedophalia doesn't include any people over the age of 12
tanukihat ago
For the record I don't support sexualization of anyone under the age of 18.
slickleg64 ago
What if the age of consent is 16?
tanukihat ago
It's not.
slickleg64 ago
It is in the commonwealth.
LlamaMan ago
Also it is 12 in most of mexico
ExpertShitposter ago
Well this thread isn't really about demanding a ban on someone but a public "fuck you". Of course its formulated with up votes to make it clear that its not a fuck you from me, but from many people.
In the end, everyone is a fascist. Its all a mater of how much fascist on a scale of 1/10. Some wanna hang serial killers, some wanna hang niggers, some wanna hang pedos, some wanna hang leftists, some wanna hang j-walkers......some just say the wanna hang nigs/peos/leftist because angry writing relives stress but they wouldn't really do it.
Even nice people are fascist, their just a 1/10 fascist.
Ultimately the anti nigger and anti jew narrative is present because they are seen as a force that will amount to nothing at best, kill people at worst, so whats the point of their existence?
And the anti pedo narrative is the same. Pedos will amount to nothing at best, rape and consequent total destruction of a life at worst, so whats the point of their existence?
tanukihat ago
What's the point of anyone's existence? I disagree with your existence, for being a Voat-hypocrite. Therefore, there should be a public "fuck you" thread about you, and I should make a serious effort to have you banned from the site. Is that the slope you want to slide down mate? Voat has completely free speech for a reason. Who's next on your hit list, all anime fans? Mediterranean whites? All females? See how quickly this discussion devolves, when you start off the way you did?
ExpertShitposter ago
My existence will never be damaging to anyone. Like i said, i'm not trying to ban anyone, just giving the one finger salute. Also like i said, everyone is some form of a fascist. If you want to get rid of serial killers, you are being a little fascist, and if you wanna get rid of j-walkers, you're being a ridiculous fascist. No two people will ever agree on where the line should be drawn.
But most people could probably agree that it should be somewhere around the point at witch someone is "damaging" to society. And pedophiles are ether damaging to society or non-productive and a constant threat to becoming damaging to society.
tanukihat ago
Disagree, your existence is damaging to Voat, because I disagree with your position on free speech. I think that allowing you to continue down this path will lead you to attempting to control the speech of multiple subverses that you disagree with, even those not pedo-related. Therefore, you should be brigaded by ProtectVoat and eventually stripped and banned from the site.
See how that works?
ExpertShitposter ago
Incorrect on multiple counts.
I never asked to censor their subs. Only to kill the people who post in them :D
Me making voat a worse place isn't really damaging to society. Cmon.
Wouldn't come to that because i didn't ask to censor the first sub.
C4H9N3O2 ago
I used to say Japanimation, but now I think I'll just call them "pedo cartoons."
ExpertShitposter ago
Pedo supporter/enabler = quick beheading.