nope haven't read that. i have such grey views on the world that i can damn near justify anything. what is good in one context is bad in another and vise versa. nothing is universally bad or good except for words that have context added into them (and even then bad things can lead to good outcomes and vice versa). i got into philosophy for a bit, and than learned enough views of morality that at the deepest levels everything becomes opinions. in a way i am an amoralist, i don't believe in morality the way that most people do. everything is subjective, the only way values can exist is through the opinions of thinking entities, therefore all morality is inherently subject to the minds of cognitive creatures.

i agree that evolution selects for morality of sorts, at least the morality of group animals. i know that r/K selection is an outdated method, but if humans evolved for maximizing genetic reproduction we would be r selectors and not K selectors, so we don't really do that. sexual selection has been the dominant factor of human evolution for a long time now. besides i don't even want children so none of that really matters to me.

edit: had to make a link out of the particular letter combination that is linked because it apparently auto made a link to reddit and that was not what i was trying to do. forgive the wiki link, i am sure you are already familiar.

i don't remember where i got it from, i think i learned it while learning OB in college.

women have the fewest complication with pregnancy and have the healthiest babies when they give birth at age 22.

well i have a warped perception. to me 16 year olds are the most likely to be pretty, and i would prefer if i got married to marry younger than that so that they get prettier with time instead of uglier, at least for a bit. likely if that happens she will be a third of my age. fuck social standards.

with no increase in risk before the father turned 40.

just men who are over 50 have a slight increase of having children with autism. its not as strong as the risk the mother brings by being over 30 though. its mostly in the mother's age, slightly in the father's age, and large age gaps imply a father over 50.

lies.

please admit to voat your sjw intentions against voat and people being able to speak freely on voat.

you have 40 minutes. mark it on the clock.

ALLOF THIS WILL BE DONE IN PUBLIC

I CHANGED MY MIND.

i trust your good judgement.

fine. enjoy the pm.

in china you are considered left over if you are single at 28, in japan there is a term called "christmas cake" if you are single as a woman and 25 (you are considered undesirably old, expired goods). i agree more with japan. my advice to women who are over 30 and looking for someone to settle down with is to start looking at men 10-20 years older than them.

@atko and @puttitout i am being spammed all over voat and fuzzy is refusing to delete it. let it be evidence that fuzzy may be the spammer.

accussing you? no.

you know what you are. admit it

you're an sjw.

you want to create a culture of certain silences about certain things.

you have actively edeavored to do just that against voat.

yeah that is my biggest complaint about a lot of people on voat. they complain about SJW's than turn around and use the exact same tactics they were complaining about, and have the exact same mentality, the exact same echo chambers with just minor differences in opinion being the only thing that makes them different. if they agreed on who should lead, what racism is, and the like than they would be the same group. both are pro censorship of ideas they don't like. both use ad hominem and straw men as their primary arguments. both appeal to authority and try to spread bandwagon effects. its crap.

you have shown you are online during this.

you have not admitted what you have done.

prepare yourself

HERE IS YOUR HINT FUZZY. YOU NOW HAVE ONE HOUR

you have been caught as a shill.

you will be outed as a shill in one hour and 8 minutes.

i am giving you fair time to admit it to save face.

whatever voat wants to have happen with this information

nothing.

whatever.

whatever happens happens

but the truth shall set us free.

and the truth is what i have

and i will share it all with voat in 1 hour and 8 minutes.

no threat.

it will be linked.

you have attacked voat for far too long.

i now act in the best interest of freedom of speech on voat and voat itself and all actual goats everywhere.

you shall feel the wrath of the silenced and the oppressed and the fucking marginalized

just like you.

is fuzzywords really she? i got in right after the big debacle with she.

nope, can you link the post for me?

Until the world ends, I believe.

inb4 you fucking idiot

last time i'm explaining this to you

i'm giving fuzy fair time to admit it to save face.

after this time is up, i will link.

you are wrong and in an hour and a few minutes

you will see.

gotta admit that whole "he supported clinton and supports isreal" and him calling that "defamation" is pretty funny.

not really. but i'll take a moment of two to watch the train wreck

+1 for entertaining me when I'm a bit bored.

Fuzzy you guddam SJW :p

oh no

she has 1 hour 28 minutes to respond or the evidence is linked on voat.

you don't trust messengers it's ok

i don't either.

i want proof

so i went for it.

and found it.

now i will give it to you.

call me all the names

but after tonight hahah

well you'll see.

well this is the best thread today, things are kind of slow.

lol y?

who cares

it's all alts

cygnus_boea (cygnus_ and then a few different letters)

assuming i intend to do anything

assuming i care what you do

fucking lol.

assuming you have any power here

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

HIS NAME IS SOETORO NOT OBAMA> CHECK HIS ENTRY INTO THE US AND HIS NAME USED PASSING THE BAR; NO RECORD OF LEGAL NAME CHANGE> SWORE OATH INTO PRESIDENT WITH WRONG NAME LOL>

defamation

logged capped and archived for criminal shill. ending notification of such logging capping and archiving