This is just a random idea that I wanted to get feedback on.
With Voat, one of the things we struggle with (on the backend) is the mutability of user votes (allowing a user to change previous votes on comments/submissions). When a user can change their vote (up to down or removing a previous vote) we can’t effectively deal with this data until it reaches the “archiving” phase, which is currently three months or 90 days.
If we can effectively “archive” user votes before this time we can do much more within the code base.
The idea is this:
User votes can not be changed after a 24-hour window (time period is variable, but shorter the better). This would mean that once a user has voted on a comment/submission, they are only free to change it within this window. After the 24 hours, it sticks and would be permanent.
What are the cons? How often would this be an issue? How often do you change a previous vote after 24 hours? Etc.
Let me know your thoughts on this.
This sticky will self-unsticky in a few hours.
view the rest of the comments →
carlip ago
Get rid of downvote meanie and we will have a workable idea.
also, looking at the @aged vs /v/gaming issue, can you make it so if a user repeated get downvoted into oblivion in the same sub, hour after hour, day after day, week after week... simply automatically ban them from the subverse for a duration, lets say 24 hours, then if the cycle repeats, 48, 96, 1 week, etc.? is this possible?
Itty-bitty_Tity-trap ago
That would be way too easy to abuse. Noone should have to upvote stuff just to prevent randoms from getting autobanned by the bots
That's reddit tier levels of bullshit.
carlip ago
Not really. It could take weeks of dedication also you would weight the system based on the activity of the sub.
Itty-bitty_Tity-trap ago
In your example of aged, the users who want him banned have already been campaigning for months already.
Weeks is nothing when it comes to being able to ban someone.
All that does is enable censorship, and fuck that shit off back to reddit