Subverse rules are a feature Voat is implementing to remove subjectivism from moderator actions such as comment and submission deletions as well as user bans. Currently a moderator simply has to provide a “reason” why they are performing such actions, and seeing that often times this reason is made up on the spot, we are not happy with this. Going forward when a moderator performs such actions they will be required to select a rule violation. This requirement will help to establish the validity of the action.
Rules can be created at a subverse level by a moderator and Voat has some basic global rules, both of which are available as a selection on these moderator action screens as well as all report dialogs (comment/submission reports).
Rules will also be used in all domain and user bans going forward.
This feature is now in beta on the preview site and any testing would be greatly appreciated.
What needs testing:
- Subverse Rule creation
- Reporting comment and submissions in a subverse (making sure they show up in the v/sub/about/reports page)
- Moderator user banning and unbanning (all this code has been changed)
- Moderator comment and submission deletions
Test site: https://preview.voat.co/
P.S. The Vote feature is nearly fully implemented on the preview site, meaning you can create them, vote on them, and then manually process them for full lifecycle testing. :)
view the rest of the comments →
PuttItOut ago
We both agree on the problem but I have no solution that doesn't involve censorship in some form.
If you have a solution then present it.
Dungles ago
One of the latest migrations that was run off were asking for help getting 10CCP so they could submit and were then downvoted up to -30 for doing that because the unwritten bully rule here is don't ask for upvotes. meanwhile the same hypocrites are upvoting every thing they fart out in the banhammer subs and asking for upvote brigades in this very thread.
Crensch ago
Oh, so holding new users accountable for acting like shits instead of earning the very SMALL amount of CCP needed is somehow a bad thing? "Hey, this limitation is here, how do we circumvent it?" Yeah, that's the kind of "user" we want here, and OH BOY are we just AWFUL GOATS for DOWNVOATING when people ASK FOR UPVOATS.
Do you even read what you type?