You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Owlchemy ago

I guess I don't know enough about this whole idea to really comment intelligently, but I do have some concerns. I pretty much like Voat the way it is, otherwise I wouldn't have spent as much time here posting, so as with anything, change can be scary. My biggest concern is that I am in the vast majority here ... those who follow the Voat philosophy and have almost never banned or censored someone from any subs I mod. I've also spent a lot of time building up subs that I enjoy. So my concern is that it now sounds like in the interest of appeasing a few for the misdeeds of a tiny minority of mods like HenryCorp, I could be voted out of one of my own subs by a group which bands together for no other purpose but to take over a sub. Maybe I'm just reading more into this than there is ... but I don't get the point.

weezkitty ago

I personally think it's way too elaborate and violates the KISS principle as well as "if it ain't broke, don't try to fix it". The mod takeover issue is an issue but not one that warrants such a fundamental change in functionality leading to even more problems.

I also don't like how there was essentially no member feedback in the decision to start implementing this.

In it's current form, it gets a thumbs down from me

Xennios ago

Exactly. But that's precisely the point, which is why he wants to implement something so blatantly stupid.

REEKS of ulterior motive.