You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

PuttItOut ago

You dog food it. Put it on /v/voatdev before anywhere else. Ok, a few test subverses here and there. But something you can be positively/negatively impacted by. And why not /v/announements? Since you're so passionate about forcing democracy on everyone.

This changed my perspective a bit.

I can't see this being mandatory for small subs. I see this as a management feature for system subs in the future.

A subverse classification system will be shipping along side of this and only subs under certain classifications will allow these referendums to be created.

Your deployment suggestion is wise. Thanks.

Nerobot ago

v/linux has malicious alts in it right now building CCP. Will you allow them to be taken over? http://archive.is/x22jE

These are the people with enough accounts to get 36 upvotes in less than 15 mins on a sub they don't frequent. These are the people who tried to create a war between v/linux and v/fatpeoplehate by crossposting false flag hate messages from each sub to the other. Last time v/linux was able to get the help of voat by posting in v/protectvoat and on v/whatever. Under your system they are dead in the water from your e-terrorists.

Dancing_Queen ago

Can’t you just ban those malicious accounts before they build too much CCP?

Nerobot ago

It's not as easy to spot them as that and if you do people wont believe you until its too late.

fusir ago

I could see how for a small sub someone would want to turn them on. What if you made it a moderator choice but if a sub needs to be "systemed" at the request of users it can be instated without the main mods approval.

Admin Mod Result
No No No
Yes No Yes
No Yes Yes

The admin never turns his key unless the sub is above a certain size and if the users want it. soap___banhammer would probably like to keep mod control. It's really the genericness vs non-genericness that matters rather than size.