I am going to start getting community feedback regarding the new Vote infrastructure we have been working on. When we release this feature, it will be a huge change for Voat, one I think will truly make Voat a community. I have always longed to empower the community content producers (submitters and commenters) rather than to centralize moderator power. It has always bothered me that a community can be hijacked by a single person or small group. It is my hope that this feature will make us all stakeholders and prevent some of the most obvious problems with platforms such as these.
This feature will introduce a ton of “what if” scenarios and we need to start thinking about the details in order that we introduce a solid feature.
Now that the disclaimer is out of the way we need to accomplish two things:
-
We need to start testing the functionality that is present to ensure we don’t have any gaps in functionality that we will need.
-
We need to start a dialog to find all the weak links and scenarios that this feature will introduce.
Work Flow
- Create and Edit Votes (Votes are private until you "publish" it and can be found in your profile under Votes tab).
- Publish Vote (This creates a submission to the subverse and allows others to see it, comment, and vote on it)
- When the Vote is "closed" the system will execute it, meaning the outcomes will be executed (Not implemented yet)
Create a new Vote:
In Subverse sidebar click "Create Vote"
https://preview.voat.co/v/whatever/vote/create
Find your Votes:
Click your profile name > then click Votes
To see Votes in a sub:
In Subverse sidebar click "View Votes"
https://preview.voat.co/v/whatever/votes
I will be answering questions in this post so if you have a question just comment and I'll get back to you.
Thanks Voat.
view the rest of the comments →
PuttItOut ago
This changed my perspective a bit.
I can't see this being mandatory for small subs. I see this as a management feature for system subs in the future.
A subverse classification system will be shipping along side of this and only subs under certain classifications will allow these referendums to be created.
Your deployment suggestion is wise. Thanks.
Nerobot ago
v/linux has malicious alts in it right now building CCP. Will you allow them to be taken over? http://archive.is/x22jE
These are the people with enough accounts to get 36 upvotes in less than 15 mins on a sub they don't frequent. These are the people who tried to create a war between v/linux and v/fatpeoplehate by crossposting false flag hate messages from each sub to the other. Last time v/linux was able to get the help of voat by posting in v/protectvoat and on v/whatever. Under your system they are dead in the water from your e-terrorists.
Dancing_Queen ago
Can’t you just ban those malicious accounts before they build too much CCP?
Nerobot ago
It's not as easy to spot them as that and if you do people wont believe you until its too late.
fusir ago
I could see how for a small sub someone would want to turn them on. What if you made it a moderator choice but if a sub needs to be "systemed" at the request of users it can be instated without the main mods approval.
The admin never turns his key unless the sub is above a certain size and if the users want it. soap___banhammer would probably like to keep mod control. It's really the genericness vs non-genericness that matters rather than size.