Example of subverse owner deleting content that didn't break the rules (theunexplained)

submitted 6.3 years ago by Renatus

In response to a submission linking to a video of pertinence to monsters in the Bible, a commentator proposed the Jews.

That's not against the rules.
It's not spam.
It's not racist.
It's not hate speech.

It's an objective, contextual and valid statement of fact.

The video itself examines monsters, terrible creatures, mythical beasts and tribes, specifically, The Nephilm. Relevant excerpt from video transcript:

the passage refers to the mixing of two human tribes: ‘godly’ people descended from the good-guy Seth and the somewhat less godly descendants of bad-guy Cain.

A discussion of the Jewish people was not only relevant, moreover, it was absolutely intrinsic to the discussion of the hypothesis. Voat users should be able issue critical utterance of the Jewish people, especially in historical/theological/mythological contexts, without the fear of:

Submission/comments deletion.
Being misnomered as spammers, Nazis, racists or agents of hate speech/crime.
Being shamed, lectured, insulted and aggressively confronted by politically-correct SJW/NPC mods.

Nonetheless, the subverse "owner", @diesel4420, deleted the comment.

Sources:

Submission: https://voat.co/v/theunexplained/2912026
Deleted Comment: https://i.imgtc.com/pfUcOBC.png
Video that submission links to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RLsCXAYm-s
Transcript of video: https://www.toptenz.net/top-10-monsters-in-the-bible.php

The current subverse owner is a sleeper-agent SJW:

@diesel4420 is a proud socialist who can be found evangelising the benefits of socialism to v/politics. E.g. 75 Ways Socialism Has Improved America
@diesel4420 views anything right of his polarized left-leaning cultural-Marxist ideologies as "racist", "hateful" or "Nazism".
@diesel4420 is a wolf-in-sheep's-clothing. First, he ascertained ownership of prominent subverse with >13k subscribers. Secondly, he censors free speech using his arbitrary definition of "hate speech" as pretext, a standard that he admittedly does not commit himself to. Thirdly, he's currently engaged in attacking and shaming all Voat members that champion free speech.

It's a dangerous Orwellian culture and dangerous precedence for Voat

Such a moderating style fosters an SJW culture synonymous with NPCs, "wrong think", communism, socialism, Marxism, identity politics, political correctness etc.

The concern is the "domino effect" or the idiomatic expression: "The thin end of the wedge." Exponentially aggressive political correctness at the hands of unchecked SJW/NPC socialist mods will overspill into the policies and governing of peripheral subverses. It happened on Reddit. It'll happen here if not nipped in the bud.