I never would have found this awesome community if it wasn't for the shill who posted this attack.
TheUnexplained, like almost every other Voat community, has clearly defined rules.
Rules are necessary to keep the content valid, which is why /v/aww removes religious debate posts and why /v/debatereligion removes puppy picture posts.
A submission explored monsters in the Bible. A commentator expressed his genuine and legitimate view-point that he felt that the Jews were the worst monsters. The comment was censored.
Do you comprehend the ramifications of censoring free speech, it's consequences and how/why it might be abused?
Your shill friends have been spamming this community for days in the hope the mods would clean-up your mess so you can manufacture a "censorship crisis" and encourage people to attack.
The mod is censoring perfectly legitimate criticism of Jews by misrepresenting submissions and comments as "hate speech" or "racist". It's disingenuous and irresponsible.
My expectation of honesty, intellectual responsibility and freedom of speech doesn't make me a shill.
The rules weren't broken. That's precisely my point. In the context of a conversation of pertinence to monsters in the Bible, a user proposed the Jews.
That's not against the rules.
It's not spam.
It's not racist.
It's not hate speech.
It's an objective, contextual and valid statement of fact.
view the rest of the comments →
ObamasPinkSock ago
I never would have found this awesome community if it wasn't for the shill who posted this attack.
TheUnexplained, like almost every other Voat community, has clearly defined rules.
Rules are necessary to keep the content valid, which is why /v/aww removes religious debate posts and why /v/debatereligion removes puppy picture posts.
Keep up the FANTASTIC work diesel4420!
Renatus ago
A submission explored monsters in the Bible. A commentator expressed his genuine and legitimate view-point that he felt that the Jews were the worst monsters. The comment was censored.
Do you comprehend the ramifications of censoring free speech, it's consequences and how/why it might be abused?
ObamasPinkSock ago
Taken out of context.
Your shill friends have been spamming this community for days in the hope the mods would clean-up your mess so you can manufacture a "censorship crisis" and encourage people to attack.
Go fuck yourself.
Renatus ago
The mod is censoring perfectly legitimate criticism of Jews by misrepresenting submissions and comments as "hate speech" or "racist". It's disingenuous and irresponsible.
My expectation of honesty, intellectual responsibility and freedom of speech doesn't make me a shill.
ObamasPinkSock ago
This community, like almost every Voat subverse, has rules, even if that makes you sad.
If I post pictures of kittens, that will be removed just like your irrelevant Jew spam or irrelevant cooking recipes.
Sorry shill but you can go fuck yourself.
Renatus ago
The rules weren't broken. That's precisely my point. In the context of a conversation of pertinence to monsters in the Bible, a user proposed the Jews.
It's an objective, contextual and valid statement of fact.
ObamasPinkSock ago
Even though claiming that Jews are the worst monsters is true, it is also the definition of racist, you retard.
Renatus ago
"Jew" isn't a race.
ObamasPinkSock ago
Fuck off shill.