Its explainable by the fact that they are perverted and degenerative creatures that like to usurp the traditions and the structures of the particular societies they enter in.
Derram! Thanks for all you do for voat with your bot!
On to your question: my post is admittedly a throwaway I made expecting to get banned by the mod here, and written to annoy him.
However, I can defend it. First I’ll cede your core argument: being the victim of a negative act is not proof of one’s malevolence.
However, knowing an event is frequent should give one reason to ask why.
In the context of “hate speech”, largely the best rationales given are shades of “it makes us feel bad” and “it invites violence”. The second I will hand wave away as calls to incite are already classified as “not protected speech”, nor would I argue for them to be included. The first I simply won’t bother with.
The context of the expulsion is also different. I could expand it to millions of sub groups of Jews in europe vs only hundreds of websites and be accurate in my statement, I would argue that website expulsions largely can be classified as a single event. They occurred only within the past decade and within the current monoculture of the mainstream internet. On the other hand, the Jewish expulsions took place across many civilizations speaking dozens of languages and dialects often with little normal contact between them and spanning thousands of years. These expulsions can be classified as many different events using the same metrics of classification I use to condense internet expulsions down to a singular event, and so I would argue represent far more evidence of behavior rallying the ire of the host.
Finally, to return to my argument of context: the Jews were largely expulsed under claims such as the ritual sacrifice of gentile children by bleeding them out over hundreds of cuts to celebrate Purim and Passover.
Of note is that the claims against them are given in detail and degree of horror not used when expelling a similar rate excommunicated people; the Roma. The Roma are never claimed to commit the acts common to claims against the Jews when they are frequently expelled from European nations, and yet otherwise their sercumstances are the same.
Why save such outlandish, bizarrely detailed descriptions of horror for the Jews and spare the Roma? If the claims lack base, why such different scapegoats between different peoples?
Satan turned them. They were God's original people and he turned them. They always sucked even in the bible. He kept smiting and smiting and they still turned to idols and shit. Should have smitten them all, but not for me to say.
Using my critical theory skills developed from professor shekelsteins class on postmodern art, I'd say that it means the third man, utilizing his backwards facing shirt, is actually commenting on how the original idea presented by the first two men is a philosophy that must be undone, or that the Jewish girl is actually more likely to rape the others. Furthermore. I would also say that this decision by the artist is a reflection on the critique that we even read things left to right, or even that the concepts of "left" or "right" or merely social constructs and have no place on our minds at all.
There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, Jew me once, shame on — shame on you. Jew me — you can't get Jewed again.”
When you start learning a new language, or teaching one, a lot of arbitrary situations appear where you know what sounds right, and what doesn't, but you can't explain it. For example the word, "well" at the start of a sentence.
Same thing was happening here. I didn't realise why some sounded right, and some sounded off. It was interesting to me at the time, so I wrote about it.
Good luck with your rap career. Remember, if in doubt on stage, just say "nigger" repeatedly, and you'll land that deal.
Stormc12 ago
“We’ve been kicked out so many times... Could it be the fact that people don’t like us plotting against them? ...No, they’re just antisemetic!”
letsgoallthewhey ago
I'd still do her.
GassyMcGasface ago
Insanity is doing the same thing and expection different results. Lets expel the Jews.
Walk1 ago
Its explainable by the fact that they are perverted and degenerative creatures that like to usurp the traditions and the structures of the particular societies they enter in.
poly ago
I tried to explain to JIDF clown that it wasn't his religion that caused people not to like him, it was simply because he's an asshole.
Im pretty sure he ignored me and kept blaming his religion
derram ago
Racists have been kicked off of way more than 100 websites.
Bet your logic doesn't weigh the same here, huh?
Volcris ago
Derram! Thanks for all you do for voat with your bot!
On to your question: my post is admittedly a throwaway I made expecting to get banned by the mod here, and written to annoy him.
However, I can defend it. First I’ll cede your core argument: being the victim of a negative act is not proof of one’s malevolence.
However, knowing an event is frequent should give one reason to ask why.
In the context of “hate speech”, largely the best rationales given are shades of “it makes us feel bad” and “it invites violence”. The second I will hand wave away as calls to incite are already classified as “not protected speech”, nor would I argue for them to be included. The first I simply won’t bother with.
The context of the expulsion is also different. I could expand it to millions of sub groups of Jews in europe vs only hundreds of websites and be accurate in my statement, I would argue that website expulsions largely can be classified as a single event. They occurred only within the past decade and within the current monoculture of the mainstream internet. On the other hand, the Jewish expulsions took place across many civilizations speaking dozens of languages and dialects often with little normal contact between them and spanning thousands of years. These expulsions can be classified as many different events using the same metrics of classification I use to condense internet expulsions down to a singular event, and so I would argue represent far more evidence of behavior rallying the ire of the host.
Finally, to return to my argument of context: the Jews were largely expulsed under claims such as the ritual sacrifice of gentile children by bleeding them out over hundreds of cuts to celebrate Purim and Passover.
Of note is that the claims against them are given in detail and degree of horror not used when expelling a similar rate excommunicated people; the Roma. The Roma are never claimed to commit the acts common to claims against the Jews when they are frequently expelled from European nations, and yet otherwise their sercumstances are the same.
Why save such outlandish, bizarrely detailed descriptions of horror for the Jews and spare the Roma? If the claims lack base, why such different scapegoats between different peoples?
andrew_jackson ago
Racists aren't looking for $28B in aid.
nobslob ago
I've always wondered why, but history is hardly a fair critique.
WhiteSouthAfrican ago
Spawn of Satan
downton-stabby ago
Satan turned them. They were God's original people and he turned them. They always sucked even in the bible. He kept smiting and smiting and they still turned to idols and shit. Should have smitten them all, but not for me to say.
fritz_maurentod ago
109
tom9152 ago
Why does the scorpion sting or the snake bite? It is their nature.
Yuke ago
Needs to start making its way closer to 200 and soon otherwise the world is fucked.
digitalentity1497 ago
This fake news sub smells of jew.
Food_Stamp ago
Oy vey goyim these facts are anti semitic.
Trousersnake1488 ago
Oy vey https://imgoat.com/uploads/8af86134b6/175332.png
MDEneverdies1488 ago
Why does the one on the right have his shirt on backwards?
Trousersnake1488 ago
Using my critical theory skills developed from professor shekelsteins class on postmodern art, I'd say that it means the third man, utilizing his backwards facing shirt, is actually commenting on how the original idea presented by the first two men is a philosophy that must be undone, or that the Jewish girl is actually more likely to rape the others. Furthermore. I would also say that this decision by the artist is a reflection on the critique that we even read things left to right, or even that the concepts of "left" or "right" or merely social constructs and have no place on our minds at all.
talmoridor-x ago
Wew
Joe_McCarthy ago
Damn j00z. Keep poisoning wells century after century.
dudelol ago
Talmudist*
rapedbyanape ago
Well it didnt work the 1st 100 times maybe it will work this time...
Fucked up jews
not_drunk ago
Always someone else's fault.
Renatus ago
There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, Jew me once, shame on — shame on you. Jew me — you can't get Jewed again.”
Food_Stamp ago
Fuckin white people...
rapedbyanape ago
Rules for the but not for the jew trees
matthew-- ago
Rules for you, by not for jew.
KVD ago
Roles for thee but not for piggy
andrew_jackson ago
Rules for Joe, but not for Shlomo.
matthew-- ago
Almost.
To make it sound right the number of syllables after for needs to match as well as rhyme.
Rules for Joe Blow, but not for Shlomo
andrew_jackson ago
Thanks, Guy. This very problem contributed greatly to my inability to achieve fame as a rapper.
'Twas the very best I could do under the circumstances.
matthew-- ago
Haha, I know this comment is sarcasm, but anyway.
When you start learning a new language, or teaching one, a lot of arbitrary situations appear where you know what sounds right, and what doesn't, but you can't explain it. For example the word, "well" at the start of a sentence.
Same thing was happening here. I didn't realise why some sounded right, and some sounded off. It was interesting to me at the time, so I wrote about it.
Good luck with your rap career. Remember, if in doubt on stage, just say "nigger" repeatedly, and you'll land that deal.