You are far too transparent with your one-sided fake news. Lotta emotive twists on things here - "vile" "purposely malicious", etc. Is this supposed to upset someone into responding? Lazy low effort shilling doesn't get a response from me.
Maybe someone else here has the time to entertain a shill trying to slide the board but I don't. We have a clear focus around here: Q drop discussion. False accusations are a waste of our time and the time of those in our community who come here to hear about Q. When a legit community member puts a question to me, I'll answer it. I don't play into shill games or the games of those with an agenda other than discovering the truth.
TLDR; zzzzz... next. True Patriots, ask me about any concern you have about me and I will answer - I can't speak for others but I can certainly vouch for them.
This is a completely inaccurate assessment of what OP @kneo24 brought and sourced.
Please, consider the claim directed at you.
It is:
@DrogeAnon: You deleted a ‘well thought out critical post’ just a few hours before saying you would not do such a thing.
I appreciate that you claim discussing/disseminating Q drops is the board’s primary focus. However, the claim made (and directed at you) is actually 100% true, despite your disagreement with a descriptive adjective.
That was not a 'well thought out critical post' imo therefore I saw that as more shillery but ok, fair call, I will answer the claim directed at me.
In my opinion that was far from a 'well thought out critical post' it was an example of someone who misrepresented themselves to a number of us on the mod team and then waited for an opportunity to catch someone out, jump to conclusions and post it in our thread in an attempt to throw more blame at us. We have literally ZERO obligation to care what anyone has to say about us on the internet and we are only focused on Q drop discussion so people who are either intentionally trying to create false narratives about us or who have some anxiety over some past deletion of their content and can't let it go and spend far too much time watching our actions so they can jump on the next slip up they see and proudly splash it all over our board are not our "go to" for quality content.
I mean what I said - if I see a quality post complaining about moderation, even though it's offtopic, due to the culture here where any deletion is treated by some dishonestly as "malicious censorship", I would advocate that the post be left (I can't speak for other mods at all times - not everyone's assessment of whether it's 'worthy of being left' is the same so if, when I'm not on, some other mod sees it and thinks differently but there's no one else around at the time to discuss it with, they may choose to remove. No "lies" or dishonesty, just the reality of a team working at different times.)
A post that completely ignores our repeated claims that we are definitely not affiliated with NeonRevolt and he is not a part of the mod team, we did not come to Voat with bad intentions and ignore all the feedback - we simply run out of comments and are unable to post - and so on, will be removed because it's not genuine concern it's game-playing anti-mod nonsense and no one who subs to this verse wants to see it. We want to see Q drop discussion, not butthurt or shilling. And our job is to help keep the feed ontopic, not to respond to trolls. We have no obligation and will do so only for the sake of genuine community members or reasonable, respectful queries like yours. Thank you.
Thank you for your reply. I sincerely thank you for your candor and civility. I may have more to ask later once I have more time to see what the team says, but for now I will just keep it to what jumps out.
we are only focused on Q drop discussion
I have trouble reconciling that with the whole movement drama and why the royal we would come to Voat taking a strong stance about being official Q drop mods/discussion in a new place.
If the emphasis is only on Q drop discussion, then why divide it into ‘official brand vs brand X?’
Second, assuming
we are definitely not affiliated with NeonRevolt
to be true: How is it that @NeonRevolt is able to make his* blog posts while claiming the same royal we privilege as the mods? This doesn’t mesh with your denial of affiliation one bit. Stickying of NR’s blog establishing Q-follower hierarchy also does not lend itself to the denial. Is there a way you can reconcile or explain this?
@heygeorge, I guess you will never get your answers. It's a shame too, as you were playing by the rules they set and were nice about it.
This notification (#374) was posted automatically by the SearchVoat.coCross-Link Bot. You can suppress this notification by appending a query(?) to your Voat permalink. You can suppress pings from these notifications on request.
view the rest of the comments →
DrogeAnon ago
You are far too transparent with your one-sided fake news. Lotta emotive twists on things here - "vile" "purposely malicious", etc. Is this supposed to upset someone into responding? Lazy low effort shilling doesn't get a response from me.
Maybe someone else here has the time to entertain a shill trying to slide the board but I don't. We have a clear focus around here: Q drop discussion. False accusations are a waste of our time and the time of those in our community who come here to hear about Q. When a legit community member puts a question to me, I'll answer it. I don't play into shill games or the games of those with an agenda other than discovering the truth.
TLDR; zzzzz... next. True Patriots, ask me about any concern you have about me and I will answer - I can't speak for others but I can certainly vouch for them.
heygeorge ago
This is a completely inaccurate assessment of what OP @kneo24 brought and sourced.
Please, consider the claim directed at you.
It is:
I appreciate that you claim discussing/disseminating Q drops is the board’s primary focus. However, the claim made (and directed at you) is actually 100% true, despite your disagreement with a descriptive adjective.
Thanks in advance for your response.
DrogeAnon ago
That was not a 'well thought out critical post' imo therefore I saw that as more shillery but ok, fair call, I will answer the claim directed at me.
In my opinion that was far from a 'well thought out critical post' it was an example of someone who misrepresented themselves to a number of us on the mod team and then waited for an opportunity to catch someone out, jump to conclusions and post it in our thread in an attempt to throw more blame at us. We have literally ZERO obligation to care what anyone has to say about us on the internet and we are only focused on Q drop discussion so people who are either intentionally trying to create false narratives about us or who have some anxiety over some past deletion of their content and can't let it go and spend far too much time watching our actions so they can jump on the next slip up they see and proudly splash it all over our board are not our "go to" for quality content.
I mean what I said - if I see a quality post complaining about moderation, even though it's offtopic, due to the culture here where any deletion is treated by some dishonestly as "malicious censorship", I would advocate that the post be left (I can't speak for other mods at all times - not everyone's assessment of whether it's 'worthy of being left' is the same so if, when I'm not on, some other mod sees it and thinks differently but there's no one else around at the time to discuss it with, they may choose to remove. No "lies" or dishonesty, just the reality of a team working at different times.)
A post that completely ignores our repeated claims that we are definitely not affiliated with NeonRevolt and he is not a part of the mod team, we did not come to Voat with bad intentions and ignore all the feedback - we simply run out of comments and are unable to post - and so on, will be removed because it's not genuine concern it's game-playing anti-mod nonsense and no one who subs to this verse wants to see it. We want to see Q drop discussion, not butthurt or shilling. And our job is to help keep the feed ontopic, not to respond to trolls. We have no obligation and will do so only for the sake of genuine community members or reasonable, respectful queries like yours. Thank you.
heygeorge ago
Thank you for your reply. I sincerely thank you for your candor and civility. I may have more to ask later once I have more time to see what the team says, but for now I will just keep it to what jumps out.
I have trouble reconciling that with the whole movement drama and why the royal we would come to Voat taking a strong stance about being official Q drop mods/discussion in a new place.
If the emphasis is only on Q drop discussion, then why divide it into ‘official brand vs brand X?’
Second, assuming
to be true: How is it that @NeonRevolt is able to make his* blog posts while claiming the same royal we privilege as the mods? This doesn’t mesh with your denial of affiliation one bit. Stickying of NR’s blog establishing Q-follower hierarchy also does not lend itself to the denial. Is there a way you can reconcile or explain this?
*tshirt-hawking
SearchVoat ago
Bleep bloop, someone mentioned this comment!
'Apparently Meta Discussions About The Q Community and Its "Leaders" Aren't Relevant To Q, According To The Mods at v/theawakening' was posted in v/ProtectVoat and includes this reply from @kneo24:
This notification (#374) was posted automatically by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress this notification by appending a query(?) to your Voat permalink. You can suppress pings from these notifications on request.