The other subverse that is questionable is /v/whiteRights. The title is "???" and the sidebar is "lol" so you know the person made it out of jest, but this would be another one that would need a ruling on whether it should be allowed to exist. (Also, down with /v/niggers.)
Whites have destroyed non-whites for so long that they don't need some sort of extra or added assertion of what has already been known and assumed throughout all of history: That whites have asserted (wrongly and immorally, but have asserted anyway) more rights for themselves over all other races for as long as time has recorded it.
This is not to say that whites should be hated against or that non whites should be racists against whites. No. Everyone should be equal. It is to say, however, that whites simply HAVE done a sufficient amount of damage to non whites as to make one question what possible rights could a place like /v/whiterights assert that whites don't already have in droves over everyone else? This renders the subreddit moot.
What you just said is: "confirmation bias". You start with your personal opinion and then work backwards. If you truly want "free" speech you have to allow the good and the bad. You're pushing for censorship and trying to justify it. If you want censorship, just come out and say it: "What I believe is the correct (and only) interpretation. Everyone else is wrong and should be censored."
view the rest of the comments →
Falcon ago
The other subverse that is questionable is /v/whiteRights. The title is "???" and the sidebar is "lol" so you know the person made it out of jest, but this would be another one that would need a ruling on whether it should be allowed to exist. (Also, down with /v/niggers.)
fetusovaries ago
why? do you not support the rights of whites?
no1113 ago
Whites have destroyed non-whites for so long that they don't need some sort of extra or added assertion of what has already been known and assumed throughout all of history: That whites have asserted (wrongly and immorally, but have asserted anyway) more rights for themselves over all other races for as long as time has recorded it.
This is not to say that whites should be hated against or that non whites should be racists against whites. No. Everyone should be equal. It is to say, however, that whites simply HAVE done a sufficient amount of damage to non whites as to make one question what possible rights could a place like /v/whiterights assert that whites don't already have in droves over everyone else? This renders the subreddit moot.
casualwhoaversereade ago
What you just said is: "confirmation bias". You start with your personal opinion and then work backwards. If you truly want "free" speech you have to allow the good and the bad. You're pushing for censorship and trying to justify it. If you want censorship, just come out and say it: "What I believe is the correct (and only) interpretation. Everyone else is wrong and should be censored."