But the publishers RETRACTED it fully and deleted it, calling it "racist White Supremacy science" even though it does not disparage asians! In fact asians have least sex hormones, least crime, and far less secondary sexual characteristics from sex hormones. So the paper was provably not "racist White Supremacy science".
By the way... What the FUCK is "racist White Supremacy science" anyway? Is it a euphemism for "facts hurt feelings of Nigger's low IQ?"
It is still online. The paper is actually just a small review of some animal and human studies that relate skin color (pigmentation) to outcomes without the woke view on it.
It's not that big of a deal, but with the current SJW madness it's hard for politically incorrect papers to survive, no matter how true.
They better are 1000% correct, or it will get rejected.
I’ve been a business manager for many years. A lot of it is about change.
Elites, Jewish or not, can’t see beyond their own noses (no pun intended). If there were pure white communities, we’d be colonising the stars by now.
But, no, they’re happy with their gated mansions, kiddy trafficking and cheap labour. Never mind that all of that was built off a pure white community that only lasted a decade or so.
Let the white communities be pure and everyone benefits.
view the rest of the comments →
RogerByam ago
Amazing. This is the only paper one needs to argue with leftists
... if one could effectively argue with leftists.
boekanier ago
Ah, I thought for one moment, but then read your second line, which is to the point
VAT ago
But the publishers RETRACTED it fully and deleted it, calling it "racist White Supremacy science" even though it does not disparage asians! In fact asians have least sex hormones, least crime, and far less secondary sexual characteristics from sex hormones. So the paper was provably not "racist White Supremacy science".
By the way... What the FUCK is "racist White Supremacy science" anyway? Is it a euphemism for "facts hurt feelings of Nigger's low IQ?"
Acerphoon ago
The paper has been retracted but not deleted.
You can still read it, if you have the link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840
It is still online. The paper is actually just a small review of some animal and human studies that relate skin color (pigmentation) to outcomes without the woke view on it.
It's not that big of a deal, but with the current SJW madness it's hard for politically incorrect papers to survive, no matter how true.
They better are 1000% correct, or it will get rejected.
VAT ago
WRONG!!!!
Its deleted. PDF is TOTALLY UNREADABLE!!!!!
See? Follow your own erroneous link to PDF and attempt to get the PDF. Try!!!
https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0191886912000840?token=D1416FD90D60DB139A8BCA6F4318CE31757FC588C1D33C6302919CFAC1D62C25004B19AF430F5E07DD7F41A11B568A1C
UNREADABLE
It is fully shoahed.
Most 2020 copies have giant RED unreadable opaque stamp over it, except illegal copies not from publisher.
RogerByam ago
I’ve been a business manager for many years. A lot of it is about change.
Elites, Jewish or not, can’t see beyond their own noses (no pun intended). If there were pure white communities, we’d be colonising the stars by now.
But, no, they’re happy with their gated mansions, kiddy trafficking and cheap labour. Never mind that all of that was built off a pure white community that only lasted a decade or so.
Let the white communities be pure and everyone benefits.