This is not an encyclopedia! This is a propaganda weapon!
Countless Wikipedia contributors have been DUPED out of many millions of hours of their contribution efforts and many millions of dollars in donations UNDER FALSE PRETENSES!
Take multiple independent snapshots (ex archive.IS) of obviously biased Wikipedia articles and user histories - Wikipedia might deceptively alter their history after they are caught.
Just one little example of obvious deliberate fraud. It claims:
A Wall Street Journal reporter observed that the metadata of the PDFs indicated they had been created in the fall of 2019, though the emails were supposedly from 2014 and 2015.
This implies that a released unaltered PDF attachment file contained a stupid anachronism, proving that it's fraud.
They use this Business Insider as the "source" for the claim, and it merely mentions them releasing PDF exports of the emails, not the original attachment files.
view the rest of the comments →
libman ago
I recently ranted about that article: https://thedonald.win/p/HrcvUFHz/
Re-posted this screenshot today: https://thedonald.win/p/HrcvUFHz/
This is not an encyclopedia! This is a propaganda weapon!
Countless Wikipedia contributors have been DUPED out of many millions of hours of their contribution efforts and many millions of dollars in donations UNDER FALSE PRETENSES!
Take multiple independent snapshots (ex archive.IS) of obviously biased Wikipedia articles and user histories - Wikipedia might deceptively alter their history after they are caught.
Just one little example of obvious deliberate fraud. It claims:
This implies that a released unaltered PDF attachment file contained a stupid anachronism, proving that it's fraud.
They use this Business Insider as the "source" for the claim, and it merely mentions them releasing PDF exports of the emails, not the original attachment files.