You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

AlexanderMorose13 ago

This is absolutely incredible. I have my own research to do to verify some information that is presented here, but overall, it seems sound. I'll come back later with questions if I have any.

zxcvzxcv ago

Thank you. If during your research you find that I made any errors, let me know so I can correct them.

poopdawg15 ago

Your pro-Hitler rhetoric makes you seem like a Mossadi, no offense, but there's substantial evidence to indicate he was a Soviet spy, a Zionist and Jew.

Rawrination ago

Link to evidence to refute evidence else you seem like the Mossad agent yourself.

poopdawg15 ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6UF9-7o4bE&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR0CIvjnmi0peR03MjoCBFmOO7pnybKSFjoBxJwz0FhCCDy_0JAukwjQF9gYouTube

http://is2.4chan.org/pol/1558369854598.png?fbclid=IwAR04uiQUgFecrADuFBWighKKmGa98M_74w2jWf0dU_kxWSH39TWUkWZ8ivE

https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/57009020_10102361590725254_8681171104800178176_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-2.xx&oh=777d3e99fbae6005b2c8a205d49f052c&oe=5D2D86B3

From Douglas Reed:

Non-Zionist Jews At this period he had to deal with a greater difficulty than any offered by the Western politicians: the alarm, and hostility, of that "World Jewry" which he and his associates from Russia claimed to represent. The emancipated Jews could have offered effective opposition to the Zionists if they had formed an anti-Zionist organization. They feared to do so, and this was their undoing. They did not want Zionist nationalism and a Jewish state, but they did want the Judaist Mecca, the cultural and religious centre, and feared that the term "anti-Zionist" would imply antagonism to that. Through this chink in their armour Dr. Weizmann unerringly reached.

His whole undertaking in Palestine was then near collapse. The "Mandate" provided that the British government would recognize his Zionist Organization as "an appropriate Jewish agency for the purpose of advising and co-operating with the administration of Palestine" in matters affecting "the establishment of the Jewish National Home". However, there was a qualification: this agency was "to take steps in consultation with His Britannic Majesty's government to secure the co-operation of all Jews who are willing to assist in the establishment of the Jewish National Home".

As masses of Jews were openly opposed to Dr. Weizmann's Zionism, even he could not pretend that he spoke for them. Thus he transferred his canvassing from the antechambers of the Gentiles to the Jews and for eight years sped about the world in search of a solution to this problem, The great mass of emancipated Jews of the West resolutely opposed any project that might turn out to be one for the recreation of "a Jewish nation".

Then Dr. Weizmann found the riddle's answer. He coined the term "non-Zionist". The Jews in Britain remained aloof but those in America fell into the trap. "Non-Zionist" seemed to offer the best of both worlds; it would enable them to oppose Zionist nationalism while supporting the Judaist-Mecca idea.

In 1928 a group of Jews announced that they represented "the non-Zionists" and would work with Dr. Weizmann for "the upbuilding of Palestine". On this basis Dr. Weizmann in 1929 set up his "Enlarged Jewish Agency", thereafter claiming that, by including "non-Zionists", it fulfilled all provisions of "the Mandate" and that he once more represented "all Jews". The dilemma from which Dr. Weizmann was rescued is shown by his words: he says he regarded the Zionist situation as "hopeless and helpless unless the non-Zionists came to the rescue".

The Arabs at once saw that this "enlarged" Jewish agency would be the true government of Palestine and intensified their resistance. The result was that at last a British government felt forced to admit the fiasco and in 1930 the Passfield White Paper undertook to suspend Zionist immigration and to curtail the authority of the Jewish Agency. The "set" policy was "changed"! Dr. Weizmann, his authority reinforced by the recruitment of the "non-Zionists", struck at once. He gave audience to the British prime minister, then Mr. Ramsay MacDonald, who behaved like a man held up by a gun; he not only revoked the White Paper but humbly asked Dr. Weizmann whom he should appoint as the next High Commissioner in Palestine.

Thus the years that the Zionists have eaten continued. What these politicians feared, none can confidently say; their memoirs are uniformly silent on this central mystery and their capitulations are unique in history. Mr. MacDonald's surrender re-established the principle that "policy" in this matter was "set" and immutable, and during the ensuing twenty years this became the paramount principle of all British and American state policy. The politicians of both countries evidently held Dr. Weizmann to be the emissary of a power which they dared not disobey; their demeanour resembled the African Native's rolling-eyed fear of the witchdoctor.

Mr. MacDonald's submission restored the situation in London to its former shape, but in Palestine the "national home", an artificial growth forcibly implanted in a hostile soil, continued to wither. In ten years the Jewish population increased by less than a hundred thousand immigrants. In 1927 three thousand more emigrants departed than immigrants came. A small revival followed in 1928, but the average yearly exodus from Palestine, up to 1932, was almost a third of the immigration.

The Zionist adventure was in collapse, as all qualified parties had foretold. Left alone, the Jews of the world clearly would never in any substantial numbers go to Palestine; if events took their natural course the Arab population evidently would increase its preponderance.

Nothing was to take its natural course. At that very moment the mysterious Hitler arose in Germany (and at the same instant Mr. Roosevelt in America) and the Second World War loomed up ahead.

Hitler was arrested with Jewish Communists in Munich in 1919, from Reed, again:

In these days, when the infiltration of all parties, classes and governments by the agents of the revolution is a known and proven thing, it is of interest that the mass of literature about him ignores his early associations and the strong evidence of his Communist background. The Viennese police dossier of his early days has apparently disappeared. His later Brown Army commander, Captain Roehm, told a Storm Troop leader (who told me) that when the Bavarian troops drove the Bolshevist Government out of Munich in 1919 the unknown Adolf Hitler was taken prisoner with the bodyguard of the Moscow emissary Levine, and saved his skin by turning informer (this might explain why Roehm, the possessor of incriminating knowledge, was killed by Hitler after he came to power). Hitler's own original proposal for the name of the National Socialist party was “the Social Revolutionary Party”; he described himself as “the executor of Marxism” (not its executioner); and he told Hermann Rauschning that he had built his organization on the model of Communism. I met Hitler once or twice and studied him at close quarters for many years, before and after his rise to power; I believe that no genuinely informative work about him and the part he played has yet appeared.

51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis Paperback – March 16, 2010 by Lenni Brenner (Author)

Icebreaker: Who Started the Second World War? Hardcover – August 1, 1990 by Viktor Suvorov (Author), Thomas B. Beattie (Translator)

Adolf Hitler Zionist and Bolshevik Christopher Bjerknes (the "Look Inside" feature on amazon has a good read contained therein)

I have not read this (these books are pricey), but I know it's along those lines. Hline, best I know). Of the parts I've read it speaks of Hitler meeting and being glad to know James Warburg and also of the Jewishness of his likely grandfather, a man named Frankenberger. http://holywar.org/txt/founder_of_Israel.pdf

The Bruning correspondence with Churchill: "I did not and do not even today, for understandable reasons, wish to reveal that from October 1928 the two largest regular contributors to the Nazi Party were the general managers of two of the largest Berlin banks, both of Jewish faith, and one of them the leader of Zionism in Germany." More at link: http://www.fpp.co.uk/History/General/BrueningMS.html

This document suggests he was installed "Le Mussolini allemand" meaning "the German Mussolini": https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/27073389_10101970275803494_3405516998173986947_n.jpg?_nc_cat=100&_nc_oc=AQnO9QKS4q3p-fdflIVGTkcXO2iDJ148HGtZeVG1WlyM--PWsKJSKPhndIctSaQqP9o&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-2.xx&oh=693a594780300db89c5019a383d2b424&oe=5DB957EA

I don't know if I completely trust this man Makow, but you're certainly free to weigh and consider this information yourself: https://www.henrymakow.com/illuminati_jewish_bankers_fund.html

All this, without mentioning Antony Sutton, who some people might mention first, because I have none of his books.

History becomes very difficult for someone trying to get to the truth of it, because the truth-seeker on the hot leads is who encounters the propaganda and disinformation.

Just as a final thing, I'm willing to be persuaded by the evidence if others disagree.

p.s. I had to delete all the amazon links to the books I mentioned because voat doesn't allow them posted. I guess you can just copy paste if you're interested enough.

LordHuggington ago

Only halfway through. I'm not a Bible afficianado, but a quick search on "John 8:44" didn't yield anything about Jews - can you clarify where'd I've err'd in my search?

zxcvzxcv ago

John 8:44 does not specifically name the Jew. Jesus is making accusations against a group of individuals in chapter 8 starting at verse 42 and continuing through verse 47. Then in verse 48, those individuals respond to Jesus's claims. Verse 48 begins, "Then answered the Jews..." http://www.blbclassic.org/Bible.cfm?b=Jhn&c=8&v=44&t=KJV#48

I hope this clarifies things!

Native ago

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” ‭‭John‬ ‭8:44‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Jesus is talking about Jews

Goat-Master-5001 ago

I would argue that he's talking about the "Synagogue of Satan", not Jews. Most of today's so-called "Jews", are not Jews at all....but something else.

Revelation 3:9 King James Version (KJV)

Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

Native ago

The Synagogue of Satan ARE JEWS it literally says that in the damn verse. "Which say they are Jews"

Here's another crystal clear quote:

Revelation 2:9 9I know your afflictions and your poverty-yet you are rich! I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

GoyimNose ago

Jesus did not say that Jews did not exist, just that there were people pretending to be Jews but weren't REAL Jews (heard that one to many times before)

Goat-Master-5001 ago

You're wrong.

Revelation 2:9 King James Version (KJV)

"I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."

You're quoting a different Bible, a subtly different translation.....and you're still interpreting it wrong. I'm quoting the King James Bible. Meanwhile, I was discussing Revelation 3:9, but for reasons that escape me.....you subtly changed the subject, and shifted it to Revelation 2:9 instead....while refraining from using the same Bible that I did. Why did you do that?

But if you want to discuss Revelation 2:9 instead, that is where Christ identifies a group of blasphemers which say they are Jews, but are not. What are they? They are the Synagogue of Satan, not Jews.

It's right there.

NatSocTemplar ago

Here's the probelem. Even the KJV is wrong. It should say "Those that claim to be the sons of Isreal but are not. Which is exactly what the people we know as Jews are. Isrealis during Jesus time were White Scythians. The mixed race mongrels occupying Isreal now, are not.

Prussian ago

No. Jews are the Synagogue of Satan as a race. The Judeans were white Israelites, like the Whites today, and the Edomite Jews infiltrated Judea, calling themselves Judeans, which the Bible simply translates as "Jews" everywhere in the New Testament. It's like saying all "Americans" are racially the same, it's not true. There were the Judeans who were white and then there were Judeans who were "of their father the devil" and the "synagogue of satan" (jews).

NatSocTemplar ago

Close. All of Isreal was once White. The Northern Tribes mostly followed Christ and left to the North at the time of the Assyrian invasion. Most ended up in modern Ukraine and we know them as Scythians. The southern tribes including the tribe of Judah, remained, and racemixed with the Cannanites, Assyrians, and Edomites, who had already racemixed themselves. Then, after Rome drove them out, they racemixed with their host countries, until becoming what we know today as Jews, which was originally slang for Judeans. So anyone known today as a Jew, is part of the Synagogue of Satan.

Rawrination ago

This is the best explanation I've yet read on the subject. Any sauces for the Scythian / Israel connection?

NatSocTemplar ago

LordHuggington ago

Thanks for spoon feeding it to me.

AlexanderMorose13 ago

Wilco. Over and out.