consider: would this judge have made the same decision if Trump's Sec of Labor wasn't involved? Did Trump elevate this guy just to make him a target?
judge's decision is rather soft, gives Epstein and co another out - puts victims in jeopardy of the same lack-of-justice that he purports to be ruling about.
You're a fucking idiot, you dont give someone more power if you want them to fall. People with more power get caught less, if Trump was going according (((to the plan))) as you're implying, qtard, the benefit would be most effective on someone with less power. Unhinge the cognitive dissonance before you shitpost further.
But do you have an argument? Do you really think giving someone more power that ties you into being in bed with him a good move for Trump if he was going to bust him?
view the rest of the comments →
Steinmacher ago
consider: would this judge have made the same decision if Trump's Sec of Labor wasn't involved? Did Trump elevate this guy just to make him a target?
judge's decision is rather soft, gives Epstein and co another out - puts victims in jeopardy of the same lack-of-justice that he purports to be ruling about.
Astroqualia ago
You're a fucking idiot, you dont give someone more power if you want them to fall. People with more power get caught less, if Trump was going according (((to the plan))) as you're implying, qtard, the benefit would be most effective on someone with less power. Unhinge the cognitive dissonance before you shitpost further.
Steinmacher ago
take it easy girl... no need to get stressed.
Astroqualia ago
But do you have an argument? Do you really think giving someone more power that ties you into being in bed with him a good move for Trump if he was going to bust him?
Steinmacher ago
wait and see... I only said "consider"