Wait so a secretive group that usually has heads of state and members of wealthy dynasties who plot to overthrow the world let all their members take video with their cellphones. I'm gonna say I don't think this was a bilderberg meeting but I'm welcome to proof.

Obama is being quoted out of context -- something the Jews do all the time whenever they mention Hitler and the "big lie" which they invariably imply Hitler supported. On the contrary, Hitler's reference to the "big lie" was made to condemn the Jews who used the "big lie" -- nowhere does he advocate the use of the "big lie." Let's try to avoid doing what the Jews do, shall we? We're better than that.

op is a shill faggot trying to discredit voat. This quote is out of context.

That is that jewish arrogance at play when you hear stuff like that. Its why they tell us nothing about what they've seen in space, on Mars or the Moon.

Ordinary disenfranchised men of every walk of life are what built this country.

Obama is talking about non trannified humans here...

When did that fuck spout that bullshit? When was the Bilderberg meeting or whatever that he said that at?

https://tweetsave.com/kbmagafl/status/1008386945905504256 :

KB446778899 on Twitter: "#Bilderberg #ObamaGate 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 #WeThePeople #TheStormIsHere #Qanon8chan #Qanon #MAGA  #DraintheSwamp #redpill #FollowTheWhiteRabbit #TheGreatAwakening #wearethechildren #wearethechidren… /nEZbC9Oq2g"

This has been an automated message.

This was taken out of context.

And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men -- and women -- are created equal.

But those ideals have also been tested -- here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often, this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others, and that individual identity must be defined by "us" versus "them," or that national greatness must flow not by what a people stand for, but by what they are against.

I think some folks are trying to argue that he was secretly advocating for that since he set it up as if he doesn't agree, but he doesn't actually explicitly reject it. Seems a little far fetched to me but I don't know anything. I'm just a guy.

Edit: here is the full speech

Source?