You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DarkMath ago

@are_we_sure @are_we__sure and @RweSure,

Another day another failure to answer a simple question. I'm gonna call it here AreWeSure. You can't respond because Charles Ortel didn't get anything wrong. There IS clear evidence of fraud at the Clinton Foundation. Long story short AreWeSure is the Clinton Foundation was Hillary Clinton's Super PAC for her 2016 Presidential run.

My theory is deep down in your call stack right after “RESIST, INSIST, PERSIST, ENLIST.” is some algorithm that boils down to: "THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS". You would never admit or even acknowledge that logic is there but if you dig a little you'll find it. Look for something like this:

"Ok maybe DarkMath was right about a few things. Giving Clayton Homes a tax write-off for sending toxic trailers to Haiti was wrong. Even Democracy Now! agrees with DarkMath on that one. Sigh......... But the Clinton Foundation did do SOME good didn't they? Double Sigh......... And Hillary Clinton would have been a better President than Donald Trump right?

But the law's the law and no one should be above it. Right? The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

So here it is AreWeSure. Here's the next question:

Why won't you admit there's evidence Hillary Clinton broke the Law?

Take all the time you want. If it helps you wake up any faster stop taking the bait on myths like "glass ceilings" or the "wage gap". Those falsehoods are put their by Democrats to maintain a perpetual victim status for women so the keep voting for Hillary.

:-D