A brief review of the Clinton Foundation fraud. (pizzagatewhatever)

submitted ago by DarkMath

"Who performs a Charity audit?"

A Charity Audit would be performed by a charity watchdog like "Charity Navigator" and "Charity Watch". For example: https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=content.view&cpid=2284. But if you read the fine print Charity Navigator didn't audit the CF for several years after its merger with the Clinton Global Initiative. And when it did resume auditing them to build a rating it relied on the CF supplied "Form 990". If the Clinton Foundation was breaking the law you'd never find their crimes reviewing the forms they give the IRS. You might recall Bernie Maddof ran the largest Ponzi scheme in human history but his books also lined up. He was even investigated by the SEC who, ding ding ding, found nothing suspicious. Relying on the CF's own Form 990 is essentially allowing the CF to rate itself as a charity.

O_O

So that brings us to the need for a FINANCIAL Audit. But that's a problem too. The CF used a small and unknown accounting firm in Little Rock Arkansas called "BKD" whose clientele were smallish mid-west firms. As one might expect their "audit" raised more questions than they answered and people started getting suspicious. So the CF hired a national accounting firm to start keeping their books. They chose Price Waterhouse Coopers but PWC never investigated the CF's finances from 1997 to 2009. They simply took BKD's word for it which is very odd: http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/27/exclusive-clinton-foundation-auditor-has-troubled-regulatory-history/

The foundation’s audits have been done by PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC), one of the nation’s largest accounting and auditing firms, since 2013. But Ortel said the PWC audits rely on the potentially flawed earlier audits.

“Audits build on themselves. You can’t have BKD screw up October 23, 1997 through December 31, 2009 and then Pricewaterhouse says ‘well we’ll take BKD’s work and move forward.’ You can’t do that. But that’s what they did,” Ortel told TheDCNF.

PWC financial audits then lead to a waterfall of re-filings of the CF's Form 990s which as usual began raising even more questions than they answered. This is where Charles Ortel comes in. He has a lot of experience dealing in the finances of charities. So he began digging into the re-filed Form 990s along with accounting records supplied by PWC. In almost an exact parallel to Harry Markopolos Charles Ortel found the Form 990s simply left out entire portions of their income. Or they just made up numbers out of thin air to make ends meet. He also discovered the possibility some of the inconsistencies resolved themselves if the Clinton Global Initiative was no longer classified as a charity. A short time later the CGI shut down.

Here are specifics on the fraud Ortel discovered:

http://charlesortel.com/the-clinton-foundation-did-it-yet-again

http://charlesortel.com/the-real-clinton-foundation-record-is-getting-exposed

You should be able to figure out the rest........if you actually read the articles.

Long story short is everything is pointing to the Clinton Foundation acting as basically a Hillary Clinton Super PAC. She and Bill used "pay to play" to elicit donations from all points on the compass. The Clinton Foundation is a Super PAC and they went for broke assuming she would win the election in 2016. Well she didn't win and it's now time to pay the piper. This might explain the rumor after her infamous Matt Lauer interview that she told her staff they'll all "hang from nooses" if Trump wins.

Take it or leave it. I'm taking it because the financial fraud inside the Clinton Foundation is so hot and heavy being hung for it is exactly what you'd expect someone like Hillary to say. She's toast and she knows it.

:-D

DarkMath ago

@are_we_sure @are_we__sure and @RweSure,

AreWeSure your silence is deafening. Is it because you heard FBI Director Christopher Wray told Robert Mueller:

to go you know what himself?

That's it isn't it. You're finally realizing you got played. .......Right? Talk to me AreWeSure. Use your words.

:-D

DarkMath ago

@are_we_sure @are_we__sure and @RweSure,

The truth doesn't run away and hide AreWeSure. You've been called out and you couldn't defend your argument. A rational person would concede the point. What are you hiding?

Hey that reminds me of Andrew McCabe stonewalling requests for information on Terry McAuliffe's campaign contribution: http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/retired-fbi-special-sues-justice-department-records-top-fbi-official-ties-top-clinton-ally/

I wonder what Andrew McCabe is hiding. ...........Shit I wonder what Gov. McAuliffe is hiding:

Without Hood Stripe

With Hood Stripe but no air bag :-(

Gov. McAuliffe could be in hot water if it turns out that the Charlottesville Mom really does got it going on.

Oh wait, Smith-Mundt makes it legal for the State Department to stage hoaxes lie to the American people produce Domestic Propaganda Diplomacy Broadcasts.

But there was no evidence the State Department was even there. Oh wait.........

:-D

DarkMath ago

@are_we_sure @are_we__sure and @RweSure,

Still silence. Could it be related to Deplorables picking up strong signals lately of demoralization within the Hill-Bot Troll Army? It seems everything Shrillery does backfires and ends up making her look even MORE like a ridiculous coin operated hypocrite than she already had a lock on 2 years ago.

There is no better example of this than her latest brain fart Verrit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpGsrIEZURQ

:-D

DarkMath ago

@are_we_sure @are_we__sure and @RweSure,

What's up AreWeSure? I thought surely you'd be all over me for my Charlottesville remarks. You always take pleasure in brow beating me for my "conspiracy theories" which bee tee dubs is a term the CIA invented to discredit people who got a little too curious.

Something's not right. You're not your usual self. What's up?

:-D

DarkMath ago

@are_we_sure @are_we__sure and @RweSure,

Another day another failure to answer. Again the question is now:

Why won't you admit there's evidence Hillary Clinton broke the Law?

We transitioned to this latest one after your refusal to list even one thing Charles Ortel got wrong about the Clinton Foundation.

I'll just keep rubbing your nose in it as long as it takes.

I will motivate you Private Pyle wake you up AreWeSure even if it short-dicks every cannibal on the Congo.

:-D

DarkMath ago

@are_we_sure @are_we__sure and @RweSure,

Another day another failure to answer a simple question. I'm gonna call it here AreWeSure. You can't respond because Charles Ortel didn't get anything wrong. There IS clear evidence of fraud at the Clinton Foundation. Long story short AreWeSure is the Clinton Foundation was Hillary Clinton's Super PAC for her 2016 Presidential run.

My theory is deep down in your call stack right after “RESIST, INSIST, PERSIST, ENLIST.” is some algorithm that boils down to: "THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS". You would never admit or even acknowledge that logic is there but if you dig a little you'll find it. Look for something like this:

"Ok maybe DarkMath was right about a few things. Giving Clayton Homes a tax write-off for sending toxic trailers to Haiti was wrong. Even Democracy Now! agrees with DarkMath on that one. Sigh......... But the Clinton Foundation did do SOME good didn't they? Double Sigh......... And Hillary Clinton would have been a better President than Donald Trump right?

But the law's the law and no one should be above it. Right? The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

So here it is AreWeSure. Here's the next question:

Why won't you admit there's evidence Hillary Clinton broke the Law?

Take all the time you want. If it helps you wake up any faster stop taking the bait on myths like "glass ceilings" or the "wage gap". Those falsehoods are put their by Democrats to maintain a perpetual victim status for women so the keep voting for Hillary.

:-D

DarkMath ago

@are_we_sure @are_we__sure and @RweSure,

What did Charles Ortel get wrong?

It's pretty obvious at this point you can't answer because, duh, Ortel hasn't gotten anything wrong.

:-D

DarkMath ago

@are_we_sure @are_we__sure and @RweSure,

I'll just keep asking the question until you answer it AreWeSure:

What did Charles Ortel get wrong?

It sure seems like you're having trouble coming up with an answer. Maybe because , duh, there is nothing Ortel has gotten wrong?

:-D

DarkMath ago

@are_we_sure @are_we__sure and @RweSure,

Can you answer the question? Please point out what Charles Ortel got wrong.

Thank you!

:-D

SecondAmendment ago

Great post, as usual, @DarkMath. Whenever I read about or consider the Clinton Foundation, for any length of time, my mind goes back to good, ole Eric Braverman. He's the missing Clinton Foundation employee who once TAUGHT at Yale. Still missing in action, last I heard.

As for those geniuses at PriceWaterhouse Coppers? I'm not the least bit impressed by them. I once worked for big, national entities who received huge sums of money (for both research and compensation) from other big, national entities. There was so much fraud and corruption and so much corner-cutting that I concluded that it all was a bunch of baloney. Everything is run by mediocre people doing the bare minimum to get by. Those fools at PriceWaterhouse Coopers, don't forget, couldn't even do their job at the Oscars correctly: http://variety.com/2017/film/news/brian-cullinan-pwc-accountant-sketch-oscars-1202001023/.

I doubt they can accurately account for things at the Clinton Foundation.