Ok I feel like there is so much evidence and so many loose ends. A lot of this research is adhoc since there is no way to know what new piece of evidence is going to come up. But is there a utility we can use to link everything together and give a place for people with validated evidence to contribute. Is there something we can create with visual links and diagrams of all the leads and evidence? I am imagining a web of nodes and links with sub nodes and links with supporting evidence. There has to be a tool already available that we can use. I will be willing to contribute to it if it seems practical. So many people run into so many good leads but dont have the time and effort to go deeper into it and other people can jump in and go deeper into that specific lead. Right now its hard for new people to jump in without knowing everything else that has already been worked on. There is a lot of inefficiencies in this process. You cant expect people to follow and read into every post. and many people just want to know where they can get involved and jump in with their efforts.
alliecapone ago
I found by happen chance a way to be able to collaborate on things..there's extras for the premium version. Padlet
https://padlet.com/premium The premium one offers privacy, customization, etc.
YingYangMom ago
We need help from the Mods though. We could ask them to make an exception to be able to collect all related threads concerning different leads in an attempt to compress all info into a very convenient tool. Let's create a list of leads and then post one 'collecting all threads related to this particular lead' every day. Here are examples of leads for possible collections :
1.Comet Ping Pong 2. Friends of Comet Ping Pong 3. Killroom 4. Clinton Foundation 5. Haiti orphanages 6. The Franklin Cover-up 7. The Hampstead case 8. Human Trafficking 9. SRA 10. MK Ultra
et al...
Silverlining ago
http://pizzagate.wiki/Main_Page
This could be the droid you're looking for!
newworldahead ago
Agreed completely and I think a wiki would be a much better format. Voat is great for discussions but not so great for researching. We're using the wrong tool but at this point there is so much content in the pizzagate subverse that it would take a lot of dedication to format and migrate every good leads on a new platform.
Silverlining ago
http://pizzagate.wiki/Main_Page
The organising principle at work.
YingYangMom ago
It's great for evidence, but lacks possible un-investigated leads. We need a research tool to help us connect the dots on other potential leads.
sensitive ago
I posted a similar idea yesterday: https://voat.co/v/pizzagatemods/1632250 - no reaction (yet).
**More and more people are submitting postings, which is basically a good thing, of course. However, the subverse "pizzagate" is now more swamped than ever with all kinds of postings, and while they may all be related to Pizzagate, not all of them turn out to contain good evidence.
Since we want to attract more people to this investigation, newcomers (as well as lurkers) will find it extremely difficult to get an overview of what we have accomplished so far in terms of evidence. Hitting the "Hot" button doesn't help, of course.
So I suggest a new subverse called, for example, "pizzagateevidence" where all postings with good (circumstantial or direct) evidence are stored - additionally to the normal pizzagate subverse.
I know that deciding which post delivers good evidence and which not may be difficult, but if you agree, I think we should give it at least a try.**
I really think we need something to provide an overview of our achievements.
alliecapone ago
What about gab.ai for bringing some info/graphics, maps and stuff like that together, at least to start? We could gather support there I probably still have invites if folks needed those. How many of us have gab? Is there anywhere besides Google and facebook to make a private group? We'd still probably want to operate anonymously but George Webb has a group started to gather together all of the Intel others have to offer, could always create a throwaway FB acct for such a group. Not many are so keen on Twitter and FB anymore, Google either so that's why I suggest gab to figure this all out.
Edited- gab probably won't work for what we need unless we use a specific hashtag. The offer of invites stands though, I have 5 of them still.
sore_ass_losers ago
Yeah, I think voat is terrible for organizing this discussion. You see the same information posted over and over. I've had issues with the search function. Stuff that doesn't seem immediately relevant to the mods gets deleted, and AFAIK that's not searchable.
I think crosslinking posts is helpful. Ideally link to another post with some description of why you're doing this, the post title, and then the link. Haven't done it but think it would be helpful to make meta-posts on a subject like for examp[e Epstein, brief discussion of what you think is important about the Zorro ranch, with a few links, then Little St. James, etc. In this way perhaps some organization could be made of the chaos, on this existing platform.
YingYangMom ago
I totally agree. There could be room for 30 potential meta-posts here. I think we should start with creating a list of subjects first.