You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Are you just going to sit there with your 'finger in the air'?

I am seriously concerned about this man, I know I could have handled it better, but men aren't the only ones that can have an epiphany, you know. Can't you see that what he is doing is bad for Voat? I'm being a HUGE pain in your ass for a reason. I don't think that I'm wrong, and I don't ever want to be your enemy. Will you and @Vindicator please investigate how many times this man has posted the pornography. I can't even bring myself to click on his profile and look, it makes me cry to read what he wrote here, i am incapable of reading more than what i have already seen.

Crensch ago

I don't consider spoilered text to be pornography.

I don't consider him to be a pedo for copy-pasting what others wrote.

If that's where you draw the line, you can go ahead and consider me an enemy, because I copy-paste things others say quite often, and I'll not have someone calling me out for quoting someone else, no matter WHAT the subject-matter.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

I don't consider spoilered text to be pornography.

The part that shows up red, or the pornography that is written underneath? I'm confused.

I don't consider him to be a pedo for copy-pasting what others wrote.

He posts pornography repeatedly, not once. If a pedo post pornography once and an autist post the same smut 50 times, he is 50times more guilty of spreading the porn. Child porn to be specific.

If that's where you draw the line,

Where is the line for perpetuating child pornography? He keeps posting it instead of linking to it. Will you please link me to where you have repeatedly copy-pasted child pornography, please.

you can go ahead and consider me an enemy,

I don't want to, and certainly not over this low IQ vermin. Am I an enemy for calling out someone I suspect of being a pedophile? I genuinely thuoght that maybe you guys didn't look under the spoiler to see what he was posting. I DMed both of you and got no response. I then made a post to v/reportspammers. What did I do wrong?

Crensch ago

Spoilered, quoted text. I don't consider it to be owned by the user posting it.

He posts pornography repeatedly, not once. If a pedo post pornography once and an autist post the same smut 50 times, he is 50times more guilty of spreading the porn. Child porn to be specific.

It'd be like a wanted poster "for raping a 4 year old and telling her that he'll kill her family if she talks" - it's about tugging at people's emotions/revulsion in order to show the pedo in question is lying.

Where is the line for perpetuating child pornography? He keeps posting it instead of linking to it. Will you please link me to where you have repeatedly copy-pasted child pornography, please.

I don't know that I have. I don't know that I wouldn't, crediting him with it. I probably wouldn't even spoiler it.

I don't want to, and certainly not over this low IQ vermin. Am I an enemy for calling out someone I suspect of being a pedophile?

You were the one that floated the idea. I don't want you to, either. But just as you had me ban you from subs, I'm telling you to just go ahead, because I won't be surprised by someone calling me a pedo for quoting someone else's words.

I genuinely thuoght that maybe you guys didn't look under the spoiler to see what he was posting.

I see it. I think he went above and beyond to keep that where people don't have to read it to get the message.

I DMed both of you and got no response. I then made a post to v/reportspammers. What did I do wrong?

Assuming intent before talking with him. Declaring him a pedo with nothing more than spoliered quotes of something someone else said.

We all make mistakes, but I don't find him to be a pedo - I find him to be extremely emotionally invested in destroying them. Not always the best with words, or tactics, but he seems to have his heart in the right place.

As do you, but I understand your position less because when others around me tell me someone is a good person, I assume best intentions and open a dialogue with whomever I take issue with; THEN if I don't like what I see or hear, I go for the throat.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Spoilered, quoted text. I don't consider it to be owned by the user posting it.

So then wouldn't it be okay for all pedos to post porn as long as they were quoting someone else and used spoilers? I just can't find the logic.

It'd be like a wanted poster "for raping a 4 year old and telling her that he'll kill her family if she talks"

Do you think that they would print the salacious detail of the rape threat? I don't.

it's about tugging at people's emotions/revulsion in order to show the pedo in question is lying.

I agree, how low can that little creep sink. Deliberately trying to do that to the people on the PG sub, heartless.

But just as you had me ban you from subs.

I don't know what ban has to do with this?

I'm telling you to just go ahead, because I won't be surprised by someone calling me a pedo for quoting someone else's words.

I don't understand this.

I think he went above and beyond to keep that where people don't have to read it to get the message.

Above and beyond would have been not to post it at all, imo.

Assuming intent before talking with him.

Not warning a pedo that i'm turning him in. Can't. Would you?

Declaring him a pedo with nothing more than spoliered quotes of something someone else said.

I understand your point here, I hope you understand mine, it's his repetitiveness and steadfast refusal to admit that it is wrong to post that smut. It is very bad for Voat.

but he seems to have his heart in the right place.

If his heart were in the right place he wouldn't be posting child porn in any form, for any reason. I hope you don't think that puts my heart in the wrong place.

THEN if I don't like what I see or hear, I go for the throat.

I have already placed your foot on my throat by having you ban me, or did you miss that part?

Crensch ago

So then wouldn't it be okay for all pedos to post porn as long as they were quoting someone else and used spoilers? I just can't find the logic.

I think that's a bit disingenuous. Intent needs to be determined as well. In this case, a user hounded constantly by pedos spamming their lies about him in response to him chose to make sure everyone can see their misdeeds without clicking on a link.

Do you think that they would print the salacious detail of the rape threat? I don't.

No? If I wanted to make sure people remembered and were looking out for him I might share some. People are motivated by their emotions first, and rationalize later.

I agree, how low can that little creep sink. Deliberately trying to do that to the people on the PG sub, heartless.

The pedos attacking him cam here. Why wouldn't he go all out in hurting their attempt to astroturf?

I don't know what ban has to do with this?

You pre-empted you possibly doing something wrong and getting banned. I pre-empted me possibly quoting someone and you going off on me. I'd rather not have the possibility of it happening later. I'll take the enmity now.

Above and beyond would have been not to post it at all, imo.

If he was going to post it so no links had to be clicked, I'd say he did quite well.

Not warning a pedo that i'm turning him in. Can't. Would you?

Nothing will happen to him, you know. Not a thing. It's not against the law to write that stuff in the U.S. You'll be laughed about in the breakroom of whatever law enforcement you call.

I understand your point here, I hope you understand mine, it's his repetitiveness and steadfast refusal to admit that it is wrong to post that smut. It is very bad for Voat.

From what I gathered, you came out both hands swinging before even mentioning it to him. I'd be a stubborn fuck over that, too.

If his heart were in the right place he wouldn't be posting child porn in any form, for any reason. I hope you don't think that puts my heart in the wrong place.

Re-read my words. I mentioned that I thought you had your heart in the right place, too, but I don't understand your behaviour.

I have already placed your foot on my throat by having you ban me, or did you miss that part?

I don't understand how this meshes with the intent of my analogy.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

I think that's a bit disingenuous. Intent needs to be determined as well.

If the same amount of pedos are fapping to the material, I don't care about the guy who is providing it, I'll slit his throat as well as the pedos. Let him be a waning to others.

a user hounded constantly by pedos spamming their lies about him in response to him chose to make sure everyone can see their misdeeds without clicking on a link

The exact opposite of what he should have done, imo. Post the links to archives do not post porn. If he hadn't posted the spoiler, I'd have ignored his post as whining, and moved on. One of the things we always look for is CP. That shithead posted it.

If he was going to post it so no links had to be clicked, I'd say he did quite well.

He posted the links, he didn't need the words.

Nothing will happen to him, you know. Not a thing. It's not against the law to write that stuff in the U.S. You'll be laughed about in the breakroom of whatever law enforcement you call.

Called fam MP type, he didn't laugh. He agreed with me that the dude was probably a pedo hiding in plain sight, to compulsively post porn and not be able to bring himself to delete it, is a big warning sign.

From what I gathered, you came out both hands swinging before even mentioning it to him.

I reported his behavior, he came out swinging. He posted child porn, I did nothing wrong by slapping him for doing so. Then he got bossy. Big mistake. He deletes porn, all of it. I delete post and stop calling him out.

Re-read my words. I mentioned that I thought you had your heart in the right place, too, but I don't understand your behaviour.

I believe he is truly a pedophile hiding behind a facade. Does my behavior make more sense now? I'd slit his throat if I could.

I don't understand how this meshes with the intent of my analogy.

All you have to do to destroy me is refuse to unban me. Throat heart and lungs ripped away, easy.

Crensch ago

The exact opposite of what he should have done, imo.

imo.

Others have different opinions.

If he hadn't posted the spoiler, I'd have ignored his post as whining

Kinda the point of why he posted it.

Called fam MP type, he didn't laugh. He agreed with me that the dude was probably a pedo hiding in plain sight, to compulsively post porn and not be able to bring himself to delete it, is a big warning sign.

Not terribly interested in anecdotes like this.

I reported his behavior, he came out swinging. He posted child porn, I did nothing wrong by slapping him for doing so. Then he got bossy. Big mistake. He deletes porn, all of it. I delete post and stop calling him out.

Yeah, good luck with that.

I believe he is truly a pedophile hiding behind a facade. Does my behavior make more sense now? I'd slit his throat if I could.

Then stop freaking out and do research and make your case.

All you have to do to destroy me is refuse to unban me. Throat heart and lungs ripped away, easy.

I have no idea what the hell you're talking about. Do you want to be banned, or not?

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

I'm good now, thank you for your attention.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

@Vindicator see parent.

Vindicator ago

I DMed both of you and got no response.

That's complete bullshit. I've responded repeatedly to your DMs.

What did I do wrong?

You attacked someone claiming they are a pedo instead of explaining the problem you had with their comment and asking them to change it. You acted like the trolls who were already attacking him for outing them, and then escalated when he treated you like a troll.

This could have been handled respectfully, but you turned it into a drama fest.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

I DMed you both before i posted the submission, I waited for a response from one of you. I am not going to warn a pedo he is about to be turned in.