@kevdude @Vindicator @VictorSteinerDavion
Post in question
@Millennial_Falcon cited rule 3 for removal, so I'm going to operate as if that's the litmus test here.
All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate.
All the title does is list 4 things, one being pizzagate. It insinuates a link, but does not say for sure, or how, or through what new source or info.
Still, possibly acceptable on its own merits if we take the insinuation into account.
EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post
I rest my case.
view the rest of the comments →
VictorSteinerDavion ago
Late to the party, but:
The post is another in the series of forum flood via junk post and link spamming of irrelevant things and context via insinuation only.
As per the last kerfuffle, posts like this are to be deleted, with OP being permitted to repost the content only if significant editing is applied.
It really is just more of the same time wasting junk - no need to expend effort creating posts to discuss the merits of garbage like that.
Also, these types of post are being made by the same user under alts and as such are to be considered candidates for the spam rules in addition to the normal content rules.