@letsdothis1 (pizzagatemods)

submitted ago by Crensch

@kevdude @Vindicator @VictorSteinerDavion

Post in question

@Millennial_Falcon cited rule 3 for removal, so I'm going to operate as if that's the litmus test here.

All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate.

All the title does is list 4 things, one being pizzagate. It insinuates a link, but does not say for sure, or how, or through what new source or info.

Still, possibly acceptable on its own merits if we take the insinuation into account.

EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post

I rest my case.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Crensch ago

I don't know the guy.

This sub is pretty embarrassing the way users are treated.

http://archive.is/9Zf62 Last comment besides today - 18 days ago. 2-months-old comments on the first page.

https://voat.co/user/Dungles/submissions since I can't archive them - last one 4 months ago.

Again, I don't know the guy, but flags went up.

And IMO MF is going overboard on some of these.

Me resting my case on the submission isn't an end to the conversation, just an end to my arguments at that point. If you have anything you'd like to add or pick apart, let me know.

I made a sticky poll, too.