@letsdothis1 (pizzagatemods)

submitted ago by Crensch

@kevdude @Vindicator @VictorSteinerDavion

Post in question

@Millennial_Falcon cited rule 3 for removal, so I'm going to operate as if that's the litmus test here.

All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate.

All the title does is list 4 things, one being pizzagate. It insinuates a link, but does not say for sure, or how, or through what new source or info.

Still, possibly acceptable on its own merits if we take the insinuation into account.

EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post

I rest my case.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Crensch ago

I'm not overly opposed.

We could sticky a poll question on whether or not we should stop moderation for a couple weeks to test it.

No need to clear out the mods, if the users don't want moderation for two weeks, mods do no moderation. Obviously, moderating during that time would be grounds for removal.

And yeah, do another poll in two weeks to see if users want rules cleared, provided they poll "yes" to no moderation beforehand.

Then again, this is probably what the trolls/subversives want.

ESOTERICshade ago

No need to clear out the mods, if the users don't want moderation for two weeks, mods do no moderation.

That is a recipe for sure chaos. We need moderation, just moderation without the current lead mod. @kevdude @vindicator