@Crensch: Then present your case in /v/pizzagatemods, ping kevdude, me, @VSD, @vindicator, and @heygeorge.
Here is Millennial_Falcon deleting one user, who has not contributed a post, indicating that he had IP access to the user, to associate it with another username and delete without the user having contributed any other identifiable material.
https://imgoat.com/uploads/8dd2c7955c/76794.png
This suggests at best, a bias for the username and deletion because of suspected association with another account, or at worse - a doxing operation run by Millennial_Falcon and executed by the likes of @srayzie who is known to openly post the real names of female users on a forum dealing with potentially dangerous criminals. This is highly irresponsible and yet is allowed to continue under the current degenerate subversive regime. @Srayzie is known to send people songs regarding fellatio, something which is highly unlikely for a woman to do. Meaning, a man posing as a woman, is attempting to put women at risk on this forum.
Does Millennial Falcon have an agenda regarding protecting certain Jewish members of the Media and Political Establishment?
It would certainly seem so.
Posts mentioning Lord Janner of the UK political elite and their connection to Pizzagate by way of self-admitted Mossad and CIA agent Uri Geller have been suspiciously deleted from the forum.
Examples include:
Self Proclaimed Mossad/CIA agent Uri Geller and friend of convicted pedophile Lord Janner, Michael Jackson (urigeller.com)
submitted 1 month ago by [deleted]
This of course brings us close to Tavistock by way of not only The Hampstead Case but also the nefarious happenings of Dolphin Square and the political elite’s absolutely disregard for the value of human life.
Below is an example of a well researched piece which was deleted by Millennial_Falcon citing Rule 2 - However, I have made it quite clear to Millennial_Falcon I was in direct communication with the parents and thus I myself was a PRIMARY SOURCE for the story and did not require LINKS since I was citing DIRECTLY FROM EXPERIENCE WITHIN THE CASE. Having written to MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS and UK JOURNALISTS, HAVING ATTEMPTED TO RAISE A JUDICIAL REVIEW INTO THE CASE WITH PARLIAMENT. HAVING SPOKEN TO THE OFFICES DEALING WITH JUDICIAL CONDUCT… It stands to reason the post is PRIMARY INSIGHT into the situation and satisfied rule 2 because of this.
view the rest of the comments →
hardrock ago
Millenial_Falcon seems to have acquired (either by mistake or by bad intentions) some "fixed idea" about what is or isn't legitimate pizzagate investigation, and is using that fixed idea to arbitrarily delete stuff that doesn't measure up. Unfortunately, Millenial_Falcon is not SHARING the actual nature of that "idée fixe" with others, making it impossible for others to respond to or argue with it. It's like an invisible rule. It's also a nasty little power trip and quite destructive of the entire VOAT platform, not mention how it's wrecking the pizzagate investigation by chopping off whole lines of inquiry, without recourse to discussion.
VictorSteinerDavion ago
FALSE
@Millenial_Falcon is operating within the guideline set by the rules and the past years interaction with the wider community about what pizzagate is and is not.
FALSE
/v/pizzagatewhaever for all your recourse needs.
Projecting your own needs onto the entirety of voat and assuming we all agree with you is a nasty little power trip called narcissistic projection.
FALSE
Millenial_Falcon is acting according to the will of the wider community that has made it's will know from the beginning. And has faced repeated character attacks designed to unseat and disrupt the mod team by opening the door to take over attempts.
ALL of this is just energy wasting churn intended to reduce the resources applied to the investigation and the recording of the evidence uncovered by the investigation.
hardrock ago
Couldn't help but notice how quickly you (@VictorSteinerDavion) descended to ad hominem jibes like "narcissistic projection". What kind of psycho-babble is that, anyway? Your reply is fallacious for so many reasons 1) Since you are not Millenial_Falcon, you cannot know what is (or is not) in that person's mind, and therefore have no standing to speak as though you did. 2) There is no such thing as (in your words) the so-called "...will of the wider community..." , at least not in any form knowable to mere mortals. 3) If you believe that there IS some para-normally received wisdom, and you are privy to it , then maybe it's YOU with the idée fixe. Such pretentious arrogance is usually the refuge of ignorance. 4) Perhaps Millenial_Falcon has experienced character attacks, of that I don't know much (and care even less), but to assign them to me is so illogical that it borders on outright delusion. To imply that I have some intention to unseat Millenial_Falcon is just paranoiac. Makes you sound like Groucho Marx in "Duck Soup" . Please please please THINK before you write!
Understand this : if you will not play openly ( and only) by the rules that you yourselves have written, but insist on hidden and unexpressed "rules" ( such as the esoteric nonsense as the "...will of the wider community ") then I'm outta here. It's your sand-box. The world is wide, I am old, and there are better things to do than argue with well intentioned (but immature and poorly educated) gatekeepers.
VictorSteinerDavion ago
Understand this:
IGDAF what you think, you're only here to create and perpetuate drama
pot meet kettle
hardrock ago
Well, now, that's a *little * better. An actual human response is something I can work with. Let's get down to business. Millenial_Falcon has introduced arbitrary standards for admissibility of suggestions, and fails to unambiguously describe what they are in the 5 basic rules for submissions. Turns this platform into a guessing game, dunnit? Also wastes my time. And you know how us narcissists feel about having our time wasted. So what hidden standard did I violate that got my perfectly legitimate submission deleted? Was it reference to adrenochrome? To MK Ultra psychiatric drug experiments? Or perhaps the historical time frame (1941 to 1964 forward)? Or did I tip over some other sacred cow which Millenial_Falcon (or yourself) deems to be unworthy? Like I said, it's YOUR sand box. Make up whatever rules you like. Just state those rules (ALL of them, please) clearly and specifically enough that others can understand and comply. My objection is that Millenial_Falcon (and perhaps others) has quite obviously introduced UNSPOKEN rules or secret taboos, and I have neither time nor interest to waste on playing "Twenty Questions" to find out what they are. I respectfully suggest that you carefully consider what I've said here before replying to me, because if your answer is anything other than responsive and professional then I am simply gone, and VOAT will be the lesser for it.
VictorSteinerDavion ago
My previous response was a human response. To claim otherwise is to create forced contention where there is none.
This further supports my statement that you are only here to stir drama and waste time.
Provide evidence to support the assertion, my earlier comment refutes this rather clearly.
Ah.
The bandwagon shill.
The overtly stated rule you violated is called Rule 1.
This is much more a reflection of how you think forums should be run than the reality of how this forum is run.
All moderators are servants to the community, not owners asserting their will.
It is no more my sandbox than yours and the rules that are in effect are those advocated for by the community.
This statement is exclusively used when there is no respect.
You imply I previously carefully considered nothing and presume to lecture me on how to conduct my thoughts.
Go. Fuck off.
Nobody needs your narcissistic rage quit anywhere, let alone an internet forum.
Voat existed before you and will exist after you. And it will exist after pizzagate (if it ever ends).
Your last statement is a very weak attempt at threatening the removal of your prescience, which seems to forget that your absence is my preferred state.
hardrock ago
What a completely astounding rant. Makes not one whit of logical sense from start to finish. Quite a feat. But, no matter. Since I can neither help nor hinder your self destructive descent into mental illness I'm just gonna leave you to get on with it.