I've followed @Mil_Spec on Twitter ever since he reported on the mysterious Special Operations "training" raid in LA on the Guatemalan House of Culture a couple years ago. He's a very dedicated aircraft observer (aka "plane fag"). He frequently reports on patterns of military aircraft activity -- how many birds are up, what types, what they may be doing, interesting call signs, and anomalies to usual training operations.
Today he published a piece on his website presenting data that leads him to believe Maxwell was actually taken to GITMO by U.S. Marshalls. Have a look. It's pretty interesting.
https://www.monkeywerxus.com/blog/get-maxwell-just-as-i-suspected
https://archive.vn/AgL6J
view the rest of the comments →
FairbairnSykes77 ago
This is false. In order for her (or any citizen) to be tried by a military court she would need to be declared an “enemy combatant” per the Law of Armed Conflict. Further according to the Uniform Code of Military Justice:
“In a time of declared war or a contingency operation, persons serving with or accompanying armed forces in the field...”
HR-6166 signed by GWB in 2006 further clarifies tribunals are exclusive for violations of the laws of war”
Nothing in the charging instrument comes anywhere close to this for Maxwell. She can only, ONLY be tried in an American Federal Court per her constitutional rights.
It is completely illegal for the government to do so in any fashion and a 3rd rate public defender would be able to get it thrown out and overturned if any entity even considered attempting this.
TLDR; tribunals for citizen non combatants is illegal.
CryptoBard ago
She's a mossad POS spy, she qualifies.
FairbairnSykes77 ago
You didn’t read what I wrote. Even if that’s true, and even if they charged her with espionage (they didn’t) that is not sufficient to evoke a military tribunal. As an American citizen she is protected from that by the constitution. It is ILLEGAL to use the military justice system to try an American citizen. There is legal precedent for that fact stood up by 16 Supreme Court verdicts going back to the civil war. You don’t have to like it....but these are our laws and they are undisputed.
CryptoBard ago
I did read what you put down, nowhere does it explicitly state that an enemy spy gets anything less than the rope.
She's the enemy. A spy is a combatant.
FairbairnSykes77 ago
You clearly didn’t go to law school. Please show us where in her indictment she is charged with espionage or as an unregistered foreign intelligence agent.
As far as calling me a lurker...my friend I think the shill dost protest too much, methinks.
CryptoBard ago
What, some sophmore at a zionist law school thinks that bullshit applies at Military Tribunals, oooh raaah, I cannot wait for that new high speed fiber from gitmo to go into use.
FairbairnSykes77 ago
Move along shill. This “Zionist law school sophomore” is done destroying your ignorance.
Mil_Spec ago
@Vindicator
Do you often have sleeper accounts with zero comment history suddenly activate?
think- ago
He may be a sleeper account, what he says is correct, though.
And he isn't trying to cash in.
@Vindicator @FairbarnSykes77 @MercurysBall2
Mil_Spec ago
Yes. I carve (and sell) hand-made wooden products through my site.
I also distribute my research freely.
Peace be with you.
Vindicator ago
As a matter of fact, we do! Whenever big pizzagate news breaks.
That said, some folks are just lurkers. I have not read a really good breakdown of the whole Military Tribunal legality thing. Law is one of those things that clever people seem to be able to twist into whatever weapon they want it to be.
When I first heard Q mention this back in November 2017, I thought "No f'g way Trump would EVER do this and play into the Demonrats' "literally Hitler" narrative." But as more and more of the corruption and abuse of the Constitution has occurred, especially this year...I'm just keeping my eyes peeled for the next plot twist and trying to get our research other there.