You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

Heads up, folks. Three minutes after I posted the original version of this submission, there was an attempt at smearing it by Voat gatekeepers. This also recently happened when @darkknight111 tried to start a dig into the Seattle CHAZ leader.

Dig dig dig!

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

You're a liar.

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3893000/24449607 - https://archive.vn/th9UC

Some of us just expect you to maintain the quality of PG submissions, since you mods are ones who ran off so many of the good writers. All for a whore and a dragon. Hmmm, starting to see a common element here. @heygeorge @MadWorld @think-, it almost seems......biblical.

heygeorge ago

maintain the quality of PG submissions

...

And to maintain the integrity of the subverse [repository of evidence] as a whole entity. This is a part of why I was invited by the founder to be involved since the earliest part of the sub’s migration to Voat.

I am here for the truth.

To state anything else is speculative bullshit.

Maybe that is the ‘new normal’ here. Regardless: @Vindicator knows better, despite being unwilling to admit it pseudo-publicly. The clearly false associative smear campaign is unfortunate, and perhaps demonstrative of a much darker motive. @madworld @think-

Vindicator ago

A much darker motive, huh? That's rich, coming from a guy who wanted to bury this research before anyone could have a chance to verify it.

We're jumping back and forth between threads, now, are we? Fine. I'll repost my reply there to you here as well:

as soon as I saw the submission, it reeked of low quality/effort

Oh really? In what way?

As for the middle part, which I skimmed, it sounds like this post is a fit for v/pizzagatewhatever. As we know, the reason that was set up was to have a place for speculation and a place for what is concrete.

Mmm. So the part where the dead grandfather runs a charity that is a Clinton Foundation partner is something you want to bury in pgwhatever, huh? It's a good thing you're not in charge of this sub, isn't it!

KKWW put me in as designer, which you clearly know as owners/moderators have access to that information.

Untrue, as you also well know. Once someone is removed from the mod team, that information disappears. And when I removed you, I didn't think to check who modded you, or screencap it, because I wasn't yet convinced you had ill intent toward this sub.

But let me get this straight: you're saying Kev had nothing to do with putting you on the mod team.

Vindy, it is really sad to witness you firsthand gaslighting and inventing smear attempts. I genuinely believed you in the past, and had been extending that courtesy.

"Gaslighting". "Inventing smear attempts." Right.

Here's a protip: You might want to put down the EsotericShade script. It makes you look really, really bad to anyone who has actually helped build this subverse.

I am glad to hear you came to your senses and deleted the submission, although it is really still troubling to see it posted (and flaired) in the first place. I find it hard to believe you’d have deleted it without there being a check.

I deleted it as soon as I realized I'd gotten one of the facts wrong. I was in a hurry to get it up on the board for digging and the key elements archived before I had to go to work.

I find it hard to believe a genuine Goat would be "troubled" by efforts to get all hands on deck investigating a children's charity tied to the Clinton Foundation, whose leader just drowned in three feet of water.

heygeorge ago

guy who wanted to bury this research

Projection? I have interest in verified information. Even a salacious headline is limited in my concern. Why do you have so much trouble admitting a mistake? Clearly you admit the thread was a mistake. You deleted it. I didn’t delete it. I made a comment about it.

I don’t know what other thread you are talking about. I imagine I will see it in my inbox momentarily.

Vindicator ago

The other thread being the thread I deleted when I went back to start vetting each of the tweets and realized I'd misunderstood tweet #2. If I had "trouble admitting mistakes", why would I admit to fucking up the original submission and link to it in this thread? You're still pushing a ProtectVoat-style smear. And your logic fails.

Keep going. You will end up the same way Kev did when he tried this shit.

heygeorge ago

I deleted when I went back to start vetting

From what I recall, v/pizzagatewhatever is for speculative and unvetted material. Also, Voat has many other subverses for that. Nearly every one! Many of them get lots of views!

You don’t have to attack me. You want to attack me. It’s disingenuous to pretend you never noticed, over years, how I was modded. Especially after we discussed it on more than one occasion.

Remember when you were the new guy?

Who modded you?

@shewhomustbeobeyed @madworld @think-

Also...
What happened to kev? He deleted his account? Why did he do that? Do you feel responsible for that? Is this a threat? Bizarre.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Wow, threatening to do to you whatever it is they did to kev. Well we know his friends are doxxers. It would kind of make sense that he would stoop to their level. Birds of a feather...

He was modded 1/3/2017, i know cuz i just got done archiving the 3rd of Jan. I prolly missed the reason for his selection on the main PG board. Maybe there's an explanation as to how he came to be modded in PGmods. i never checked.

heygeorge ago

I don’t remember when I was modded because I’m not a total prostitute. I only remember the important bit: Why.

I don’t have a clue what ‘they’ did to Kev, outside of character assassination, if anything at all. Frankly, I was never really close with kd.

Do you archive all Jan 3rd’s at once? Or are you just slowly catching up?

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

slowly catching up. In the beginning, we got info overload, so the archiving is slow. As I get further along the archives should go much faster. Someones been going through and making a lot of new archives, that has helped a bit, their bot still doesn't get them all, though.