Of course it is. The tweet is a lie from the outset, easily verified by reading the tweet itself and then the very beginning of the unattributed Facebook post.
Oh, it looks like @vindicator is pushing it, too. Vindy, really? This is the standard of evidence now? Sad. I appreciate that you want to fight the good fight against the occupiers shutting down your freeway.
The burden of evidence demonstrating elite pedophilia is now a deceptive tweet?
Letter from a friend of mine who works for the Seattle police Dept
I've known this guy since childhood.
The “letter from a friend of mine” is a Facebook post. Which immediately attributes itself to being from someone else. The account also is fond of blaming Twitter for typos... The Facebook post is a minimum four days old. Yet the tweet (that @vindicator also shared) claims OP personally knows this person? But they also claim not to know when this exactly was ‘sent’.
While u/darkknight111 can defend rule one, I don’t see how rule two is remotely established.
EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link.
So either the admission is that this is not fact in any way, or what we are acknowledging is that a phone screengrab of unattributed Facebook copypasta meets the burden of ‘evidence’.
view the rest of the comments →
heygeorge ago
Of course it is. The tweet is a lie from the outset, easily verified by reading the tweet itself and then the very beginning of the unattributed Facebook post.
Also, this post has ZERO to do with elite pedophilia. @darkknight111 you may want to delete this and repost in v/pizzagatewhatever
...
Oh, it looks like @vindicator is pushing it, too. Vindy, really? This is the standard of evidence now? Sad. I appreciate that you want to fight the good fight against the occupiers shutting down your freeway.
darkknight111 ago
If Seattle leadership is helping these scum bags out, then they are involved in protecting pedos.
Cover up and protection efforts go under submission rules.
heygeorge ago
So, let’s see:
The burden of evidence demonstrating elite pedophilia is now a deceptive tweet?
The “letter from a friend of mine” is a Facebook post. Which immediately attributes itself to being from someone else. The account also is fond of blaming Twitter for typos... The Facebook post is a minimum four days old. Yet the tweet (that @vindicator also shared) claims OP personally knows this person? But they also claim not to know when this exactly was ‘sent’.
While u/darkknight111 can defend rule one, I don’t see how rule two is remotely established.
So either the admission is that this is not fact in any way, or what we are acknowledging is that a phone screengrab of unattributed Facebook copypasta meets the burden of ‘evidence’.
@madworld @shewhomustbeobeyed @heyg3orge
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Thanks for getting him to delete this garbage. <3
@Vindicator
heygeorge ago
https://tweetsave.com/worldgoneweirde/status/1274133232603127808
I didn’t archive the post. The link above is a grab of the tweet. Below is Vindy’s retweet, pushing this as if factual, or evidence-based.
https://tweetsave.com/vindic8tr/status/1274172112823963650
And here is the original submission title/body:
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Good grief, you just had to show me that tonight. dinnu?
Now i'm all grumpy. Well done.
heygeorge ago
Oh. Congrats!