You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

EricKaliberhall ago

Hi @rickman2,

Thanks for sharing! To satisfy rule 2, Empiricism you need to provide a link. I will give you the 24Hr Grace flair, so you'll have time to edit. For more information please see our subverse rules that is located in the sidebar. Thank you.

Vindicator ago

@Rickman2 This also needs a connection to abuse of minors to satisfy Rule 1. I don't think Patty Hearst was a minor when she got involved.

ababcb ago

This makes no sense. NXIVM, a group that abused countless minors had dossiers on Hearst. That creates a connection between Hearst and the abuse of minors. This is the second time in less than 24 hours that you have covered for someone with a direct connection to NXIVM.

Vindicator ago

This makes no sense. NXIVM, a group that abused countless minors had dossiers on Hearst. That creates a connection between Hearst and the abuse of minors.

So now every single person NXIVM had dossiers on is a child trafficker? Dude, you don't logic very well.

I'm happy to leave up a submission on Hearst. But it needs to follow the submission rules, which I did not make.

This is the second time in less than 24 hours that you have covered for someone with a direct connection to NXIVM.

A) There's no direct connection to NXIVM here.

B) There are 262 NXIVM submissions in our research stockpile. Your narrative is garbage.