Are we in the midst of a MindWar cooked up by the likes of pedorapist and high level military, NSA, and Satanic officer Michael Aquino?
This is unacceptable, as his document is borderline prophetic pertaining to what we research here, and what the world is going through NOW.
Authored in 1980 by the PizzaGate popular mention on the very spot he raped 66+ boys at Presido Daycare, this NSA founder, and Satanic High priest openly discusses tactics of control and influence over YOU and society. Though what is proposed may have been fairly 'sci fi' even 10 years ago, much of it sounds eerily similar to the 5G, Q, MSM, Corona backlash building momentum each day.
It has been DECLASSIFIED, is short, and is easily available. If you have not read this, please do so! I feel, the accuracy of our perspective depends on it.
MindWar (1980) 9 page document presumably presented to/from the network of Headquarters, 7th Psychological Operations Group
United States Army Reserve Presidio of San Francisco, California by Colonel Paul E. Valley, Commander
and Major Michael A. Aquino, PSYOP Research & Analysis Team Leader.
Introduction by Michael A. Aquino Lt. Colonel, Military Intelligence, USAR-Ret November 2003
In the later 1970s, Psychological Operations (PSYOP) doctrine in the U.S. Army had
yet to emerge from the disappointment and frustration of the Vietnam War. Thus it was that in 1980 Colonel Paul Vallely 1 , Commander of the 7th PSYOP Group, asked me, as his Headquarters PSYOP Research & Analysis (FA) Team Leader, to draft a paper that would encourage some futurethought within the PSYOP community. I prepared an initial draft, which Colonel Vallely reviewed and annotated, which resulted in revised drafts and critiques until he was satisfied, and the result of that was this Colonel Vallely sent copies of it to various governmental offices, agencies, commands, and publications involved or interested in PSYOP. He intended it not as an article for publication, but simply as a "talking paper" to stimulate dialogue. In this it was quite successful, judging by the extensive and lively letters he received concerning it over the next several months. That should have been the end of MindWar: a minor "staff study" which had done its modest job.
With the arising of the Internet in the 1980s, however, MindWar received an entirely
unexpected - and somewhat comic - resurrection. ...
Within the U.S. military, PSYOP has habitually been relegated to a back-seat as a
"force multiplier". The principal strategic decisions are made in consideration of traditional
political and military interests and goals. Only then is PSYOP invited to the table, to help
achieve already-agreed-upon missions more efficiently.
MindWar reverses this sequence. Psychological means for achieving victory -
essentially through convincing the enemy that he really wants to bring his national policies
into harmony with ours - are fashioned in support of basic political goals. The use of
"ordinary" military force (bombs, bullets, etc.) is regarded as a "last resort" in
circumstances wherein MindWar by itself fails.
-Page 3 Mindwar 1980 -
The advantage of Mind War is that it conducts wars in nonlethal, noninjurious, and
nondestructive ways. Essentially you overwhelm your enemy with argument. You seize
control of all of the means by which his government and populace process information to
make up their minds, and you adjust it so that those minds are made up as you desire.
Everyone is happy, no one gets hurt or killed, and nothing is destroyed.
Page 4 MindWar (1980)
Psychotronic research is in its infancy, but the U.S. Army already possesses an
operational weapons systems designed to do what LTC Alexander would like ESP to do -
except that this weapons system uses existing communications media. It seeks to map the
minds of neutral and enemy individuals and then to change them in accordance with U.S.
national interests. It does this on a wide scale, embracing military units, regions, nations,
and blocs. In its present form it is called Psychological Operations (PSYOP).
Page 5 MindWar (1980)
MindWar is the deliberate, aggressive convincing of
all participants in a war that we will win that war.
It is deliberate in that it is planned, systematic, and comprehensive effort involving all
levels of activity from the strategic to the tactical. It is aggressive because opinions and
attitudes must be actively changed from those antagonistic to us to those supportive of us
if we are to achieve victory. We will not win if we content ourselves with countering
opinions and attitudes instilled by enemy governments. We must reach the people before
they resolve to support their armies, and we must reach those armies before our combat
troops ever see them on battlefields.
Page 7 MindWar (1980)
To this end MindWar must be strategic in emphasis, with tactical applications playing
a reinforcing, supplementary role. In its strategic context, MindWar must reach out to
friends, enemies, and neutrals alike across the globe - neither through primitive
"battlefield" leaflets and loudspeakers of PSYOP nor through the weak, imprecise, and
narrow effort of psychotronics 11 - but through the media possessed by the United States
which have the capabilities to reach virtually all people on the face of the Earth.
These media are, of course, the electronic media - television and radio. State of the
art developments in satellite communication, video recording techniques, and laser and
optical transmission of broadcasts make possible a penetration of the minds of the world
such as would have been inconceivable just a few years ago. Like the sword Excalibur, we
have but to reach out and seize this tool; and it can transform the world for us if we have
the courage and the integrity to enhance civilization with it. If we do not accept Excalibur,
then we relinquish our ability to inspire foreign cultures with our morality. If they then
desire moralities unsatisfactory to us, we have no choice but to fight them on a more
brutish level.
MindWar must target all participants if it is to be effective. It must not only weaken
the enemy; it must strengthen the United States. It strengthens the United States by
denying enemy propaganda access to our people, and by explaining and emphasizing to
our people the rationale for our national interest in a specific war.
Quite right, and so it must be axiomatic of MindWar that it always speaks the truth.
Its power lies in its ability to focus recipients' attention on the truth of the future as well
as that of the present. MindWar thus involves the stated promise of the truth that the
United States has resolved to make real if it is not already so.
Page 8
A MindWar message does not have to fit conditions of abstract credibility as do
PSYOP themes; its source makes it credible.
Page 9 / 10
this is nothing that can be easily faked, if in fact it can be faked at all. "Rapport",
which the Comprehensive Dictionary of Psychological and Psychoanalytical Terms
defines as "unconstrained relations of mutual confidence", approaches the subliminal;
some researchers have suggested that it is itself a subconscious and even perhaps even
ESP-based "accent" to an overt exchange of information.
Why does one believe one television newsman more than another, even though both
may report the same headlines? The answer is that there is rapport in the former case;
and it is a rapport which has been recognized and cultivated by the most successful
broadcasters.
For the mind to believe in its own decisions, it must feel that it made those decisions
without coercion. Coercive measures used by the operative, consequently, must not be
detectable by ordinary means. There is no need to resort to mind-weakening drugs such as
those explored by the CIA; in fact the exposure of a single such method would do
unacceptable damage to MindWar' s reputation for truth.
Existing PSYOP identifies purely-sociological factors which suggest appropriate
idioms for messages. Doctrine in this area is highly developed, and the task is basically one
of assembling and maintaining individuals and teams with enough expertise and experience
to apply the doctrine effectively. This, however, is only the sociological dimension of target
receptiveness measures. There are some purely natural conditions under which minds may
become more or less receptive to ideas, and MindWar should take full advantage of such phenomena as atmospheric electromagnetic activity , air ionization, and extremely low frequency waves . 5G?
view the rest of the comments →
ORDOTEMPLIINTERNETIS ago
Misspelling EDIT : Ret Gen Paul Vallely (not Valley)