As Q Anon frequently posts confirmation of Elite pedophile ring issues, this post is relevanrt to Pizzagate. And I know we normally quarantine Q posts on other subs in deference for the hardcore pizzagaters who doubt Q's Authenticity as a clandestine counter intelligence operation within the Trump administration
however, in regards to his bona-fides, this is the biggest Q proof yet, and it proves that Q Anon is working with US A.G. Barr, Prosecutor Durham & IG Horowitz.
On Dec 2 Q posted a watch showing the time 1:29. At precisely 1:29 on 9 Dec, all three Lawmen posted IG reports & [rebuttals 1] and 2 (https://twitter.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1204105753793089537)
it is also important to incorporate Q post 309 (which he reposted on 2 Dec 2019)
309 simply says 'Justice
but it was posted 9 Dec 2017 - a 2 year Delta
and I'll leave you autists to guess at what time of day it was posted
post script:
remembering too, that the very first Q post was on Durham's day of appointment
So:
Q first posts on Durhams 1st day of appointment, then on 9 Dec 2017 at 1:29 he says, simply ' Justice' (time and date are Mirrors 12/9 and 1:29)
precisely 2 years later, with a one week lead in reminder, Durham Barr and Horowitz make co-ordinated public addresses about draining the swamp (note the Durham announcement slipped in 4 minutes early at 1:25, for the fickle )
view the rest of the comments →
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
'clandestine counter intelligence operation' could also easily be interpreted as' re-elect DJT2020 campaign operation', couldn't it?
And that is linked to what? You haven't explained what the FISA Review has to do with pedophilia.
Do we have any submissions on FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation? I don't recall this.
Please answer my questions, I am trying to understand how this is relevant. Honestly.
MolochHunter ago
If it is contended that Q anon is an undisputed part of the Trump administration, then it stands to reason that as an unofficial policy, nodded and winked to supporters of the Trump administration via Q, that Trump A) admits pizzagate is real, and B) has an ethical responsibility to bring justice to the perpetrators
It doesnt matter whether or not it is an openly articulated 'Campaign Promise' of Trump - Trump knows that his supporters (those who follow Q at least) regard it as his acknowledged responsibility to do something about the pizzagate networks
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Your if/then statement doesn't answer my questions. I'll try again.
You say, "clandestine counter intelligence operation". I say, " re-elect DJT2020 campaign operation". Can you prove that I'm wrong?How does your scenario relate to PG?
What does the FISA Review have to do with Elite Pedophilia? Why should we believe any of it?
Do we have any submissions on FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation?
I don't think worship of politicians belongs here. NO ONE has been tried and executed, no one is in jail. All we are seeing is a regime change.
When it is PROVEN that Q is legit, AND not working against the people. THEN we should document any evidence that Q brings forward. That hasn't happened yet.
MolochHunter ago
this proves that Q is legit
just because they havent reached some arbitrary step in the process of justice that you decide, doesnt mean you get to decide on behalf of the pizzagate community not to legitimise Q posts
1) i dont have to prove youre wrong bc both propositions can be simultaneously true. they arent mutually exclusive
2) the fISA review is peripheral to elite pedophilia. But THROUGH it, we have established incontrovertible co-ordination between the DoJ and the world most widely recognised anti pizzagate/pedogate advocate known as Q anon. Why that would be bad news to anyone genuinely invested in this sub is frankly curious
3) I dont know, do we? I imagine you could find something, given the pedo porn conviction of 'star witness' George Nader
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
1} You're right, both of us can be correct. I still don't see the connection to PG. Show me clear links, please.
2) Your submission implies that the FISA Review reveals something we need to know about in PG.
I'm curious why you want me to believe you, when you clearly have no proof. HOW IS THIS CONNECTED TO ELITE PEDOPHILIA? There are many PG sub members who do not follow Q.
3) If we haven't covered OP /hurricanecrossfire then how do you know it's PG related?
It's YOUR responsibility to tell ME how your post is relevant to PG. Aren't you a mod on GA? You should have a ton of clearly written evidence at your finger tips.
MolochHunter ago
arguing that you cant post anything whatsoever about Q - the worlds most recognised anti pedogate proponent - unless the specific development it is 100% about elite pedophilia is like saying we arent allowed to post about the alleged assassination of Jenny Moore
bc murder is different to elite pedophila right?
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Okay, one more time:
You said:
I doubt Q Authenticity as a "clandestine counter intelligence operation within the Trump administration"
Please show me your proof.
You said:
How is this related to elite pedophilia? it's politics as usual. Anybody in Gitmo, yet?
You said:
Where are the connections to Elite Pedos or their arrests. Still just politics.
You said:
Where is the swamp draining, that it isn't being filled with a new batch of more of the same old shit?
No one that is a cousin of DJT has been made to pay for their crimes, not anywhere in the world. Yet we KNOW that they are guilty. Why is Q not explaining that?
Why can't you do a research post instead of trying to push something that is as easy to prove as flat-earth? Pssssh
I want Q to be true. I only see woo-woo theories. The swamp ain't draining.
MolochHunter ago
ok, one more time
Q anon could fart and it would be pizzagate related
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
He'd fart, and you'd shove your face right in it.
How come not one single Qtard can answer my questions? You do know that PG existed before Q, right?
MolochHunter ago
you get answered
you just refuse to accept the answers
so you deserve all the frustration you experience over the issue
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
You haven't answered one question.
You didn't answer my questions.
While you may think I'm frustrated, that would be a lie. I am capable of answering every question as to why I don't trust DJT, Q, DOJ, Jews, RCC, LDS, FBI, CIA, NSA, REP, DEM, FEMA and even OSHA. You have yet to explain to anyone who doesn't follow Q, why it should be believed.
I'm telling everyone that the mods of GA are incapable of answering one persons questions. EPIC.
@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @heygeorge @NOMOCHOMO @think-
MolochHunter ago
you want to bring in all the other mods to witness proof of my assertion that you simply dont accept answers given to you? knock yourself out
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Naw, I just think it's funny you won't give an honest answer to honest questions. I never denied not trusting Q. But I don't need to trust Q or you. If Q is all you say it is, then great, prove it. But if it is another psyop being played on everyone, then I think it belongs elsewhere, just like seth rich stuff.
@Vindicator, Why can't Q posts be forced to go to v/pizzagatewhatever, since it is an unproven theory? I bet this would solve all the problems. @EricKaliberhall @heygeorge @think- @gamepwn
Vindicator ago
Because that would require all submissions to v/pizzagate be only made to v/pizzagatewhatever. Just about everything we research is an unproven theory:
The answer to your question is so obvious that it casts a very dark light on your intentions regarding this subverse.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
There is proof of those points you listed. Still no proof that Q is a good guy. NONE.
Why do you keep saying that my distrust of some lying anon, on another website equals "dark intentions". Or are you saying that Q doesn't lie? Cuz I know that all them Qtards run around squealing that "disinfo is necessary". it isn't needed in PG sub. We need truth.
When Q stops lying, I'll start listening. Not before.
Why is this bad?
Vindicator ago
You: Makes a proposal that would lead to the shut down of all major lines of inquiry on v/pizzagate
Me: Notes this is a sign of dark intentions
You: Claims I said you have dark intent because you don't trust Q
Dishonesty noted
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Twist my words, and intentions all you want. I won't stop you. But I will forgive you.
Vindicator ago
"Twist my words" she says, after twisting my words.
So disappointing.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Separating Q into it's own sub has not "shut down all major lines of inquiry on PG", but you say that my and others wanting to keep an admitted source of disinformation out of PG, unless independently verified means we have "dark intentions".
When did valuing truthful sources become bad? You've known my opinion on this for a long time. Why are you always accusing me of things that aren't true?
Vindicator ago
I've never accused you of anything untrue. It's you who makes unsourced claims, not me. You are not arguing from a place of honesty and good will. Anyone reading this thread can see you dodging, weaving and deflecting. Just because you pretend you are not doing it doesn't make people blind. But let me spell it out for you:
Enty is an admitted source of disinfo. FBIAnon is an admitted source of disinfo. Wikileaks is widely believed by many goats to be a source of disinfo. Remember the much vaunted "Phase III" of Podesta emails that Assange never dropped? The cryptic chess board tweet? All major MSM cited in research here are sources of disinfo. A large portion of the work of this board is to analyze disinfo and document it. Why only whine about QAnon? A fair application of the dictatorial content curation you are pushing for would require removing ALL of these.
And that doesn't even take into consideration the fact that Q has been proven true dozens of times, despite your constant chanting otherwise.
Your continued desire to censor discussion of it from this board -- a board that was very likely created directly because of what later became known as QAnon -- is going to get you exactly nowhere with me. Not from you. Not from ES. Not from those he recruited during his consensus cracking operation. Not from that doxing piece of shit Slime. Not today. Not tomorrow. Not ever. And guess what? I don't fuck around playing games here. I've left you thugs, malcontents and manipulators no leverage points to use against me. You are stuck.
If you don't like that, I recommend you leave. You are wasting your time.
And lest you think that you will wear me down by wasting mine, you should know that every time I see another one of these QAnon attack threads it has exactly the opposite effect. The asschap fills me with joy and vindication.
On that happy note, I will leave you with Q's latest assertion:
And here's an interesting take on just who that first unsealed indictment might be, and how it's pizzagate related: https://twitter.com/SewwWhat/status/1207401612270088192 I find this plausible, given the fact Voat was hit with a three day deplatforming when we were in the middle of the Maggie Nixon photo dig.
Nahhhhh. We wouldn't want to discuss any of this on this board. No fucking way!!!!!! LMFAO
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
You and your frens accuse me of being a shill, thug, malcontent(kinda true), manipulator, GG, think-, part of ES crew, ZB crew, PV crew, WoS crew. Said I have dark intentions. The only thing you haven't accused me of is dox. I thank you for that.
You have allowed people to ask questions and argue about these in past. Why is it bad to argue Q? If you say me asking for Q to goto PGWE is overkill, fine.
No and no. Those were not my forte. Don't follow politics.
Because this is PG not GA, tGA, TA QRV, and all the other Q subs. And I never said that proven Q post didn't belong here. Just not all.
Bullshit, no evidence that DJT, Q, Assange, seth rich and all others work together.
No kidding. This is why I ask for proof.
Is that what you think, really?
What does asschap mean?
I think if that happens, it will be wonderful. What is Marker [9]? I'm not interested in someone elses take on who might be in indictment, who do you think it is?
I WANT to discuss it. The minute I say don't trust Q or DJT until a cousin gets arrested everyone asumes I'm enemy instead of person who never believes politicians.
Vindicator ago
Where did anyone ever say this? More spin and shitty innuendo.
You never made a single attempt to "argue Q". All you've done here is snipe. Just a lot of bitching and moaning about how you don't believe Q. Not one single attempt at making an argument at all.
I think there's a good chance it will be Obama, for signing off on Page and Strok's illegal surveillance. There's proof he was being kept in the loop on the whole wicked scheme.
I also know that Trump doesn't give away his moves in advance, so this could be a bait and switch designed to make them waste even more ammo. We might get an RBG state funeral out of that one.
Another possibility could be high ranking individuals in the Catholic Church. That would cause a "mass pop awakening".
Yeah...except for the fact that you want Q discussion moved to PGW. That pretty much demonstrates this claim is complete bullshit.
There absolutely is evidence DJT, Q and Assange work together. If you bothered to "follow politics" you wouldn't make such an ignorant claim. ProTip: If you don't want to look like a shill, don't pontificate about things you admit you know nothing about.
If Rich was the source of the DNC emails, that would make him a participant as well. I tend to think that Rich gave Craig Murray the DNC emails for his own reasons, though, not because he had any knowledge of a whitehat counter-coup.
v/Pizzagate was the first Q sub on Voat, with lively collaborative research and discussion for months. The most influential voices -- at least a dozen -- were targeted and attacked by proven shills, just as you have been attacking MH for bringing up the subject, so as to split and divide the community and pit people against each other. And guess what? They failed. v/Pizzagate is still a "Q sub" and it will remain so as long as I am here.
How ironic that you claim "proven Q posts" belong...in a thread about a proven Q post that you are claiming doesn't belong. Do you even read what you write?
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
I have tried to vet Q, I get lost in the disinfo. When I ask questions, i am given mostly silence. People don't like questions they can't answer. The questions keep piling up to the point i forget the subject. All my own failings, i admit. Still doesn't mean I didn't try.
Why is putting a submission that makes claims that haven't been proven on PGWE, a bad thing? OP stated:
To me incontrovertible means that one if not all three people mentioned in title CONFIRMED it by saying, "Yep, we did that".
That would have probably made MSM if true. Isn't JA still in prison? If he's working with DJT, i feel sorry for him.
Did the creator of PG sub call it that? I understand that it is your position that PG is now Q shitposting sub like GA and the others. Your sub. Your rules.
I still say this submission doesn't even come close to what it says in the title, 'Incontrovertible' my eye.
Vindicator ago
You have to be kidding. MSM won't touch Q with a 1000 yard pole. Just like they wouldn't address a single one of the real questions collectively known as "pizzagate". They push a set of canned talking points, none of which accurately reflect the truth.
I love how you deliberately miscontrue what I said, which is literally true on its face, exactly as written. v/Pizzagate was the first Q sub on Voat. Literally. The first subverse to discuss Q posts was v/pizzagate. The OP who made those first posts DMed me a week ahead of time to find out how to talk about it without getting sideways with Falcon and the ruleset. The discussion was virtually shill free for a few weeks and no one had a problem with it. Then BOOM! Suddenly all the submissions on the topic were filled with trolls. I didn't take it very seriously until I saw that happen. Then I started to pay very close attention.
Why are you asking about the creator of PG? He abandoned the sub within months of pizzagate breaking, over a year before Q began leaking. Are you just throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks?
That is essentially what they did do by timing their various actions to occur at the same time. You do understand what a backchannel is, right? Trump and his team can't just come out and say "Yep. That was me posting hints about classified information on 8chan." They'd actually have a reason to impeach him, then. Why would you want someone that ham fisted in charge of the nuclear codes?
It's like you don't want there to be a way for Trump to communicate with his base that the MSM can't control.
I recommend if you want to get questions answered, you ask them in good faith and stop acting like a troll all the time. No one takes you seriously anymore. Why would they waste time explaining stuff to you that if you cared you could find out for yourself?
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
I was referring more to DJT and JA working together. That would have been reported if true, imo. MSM would have had a field day with that.
So the first round of owners DIDN'T call PG a Q sub, but I'm 'deliberately misconstruing'. Okay.
I don't know who you are talking about here. Is it iamq, iami, or someone else?
Why can't I ask about the creator of PG? I am curious, maybe others are too. Thank you for at least admitting that Q was not involved in KKWW starting PG.
This is where i get lost. Didn't it come out that most of these people don't run their Twit Accts by themselves? That assistants and other office personnel use their accts too? I know I read that somewhere, very early in my exploring the web. It surprised me cuz I would never let a secretary have access to something like twit or FB, with my name on it. My point is that i don't know if those people made those tweets, or some other people did. No way to tell.
So your position is that DJT is a criminal, and deserves to be impeached for leaking classified intel?
My position is that Q is brainchild of reelection campaign, and doesn't have access to classified material. Therefore, DJT is not breaking law by letting Q larp.
I don't want ANYONE who has ever considered themselves a Democrat to have access to anything other than hemlock laced hot chocolate. RINOs SUCK BIG GREEN DONKEY DICKS (yes i was saying this years before i met Donqi)
I didn't say djt couldn't tweet. Putting words in my mouth, again.
I asked in my Qs in good faith, they weren't answered. I have given up.
I know you don't.
My questions have always been about things i could find answers for.
I'll have to take your word for that. I have no way of knowing.
My pals don't have access to the Senate. Are you talking about Dems? Never had a dem pal, ever.
about what?
I can use it as i please, it is birthright. Have you figured out 1A yet?
Stop lying about me. I was laughing at Q being a liar, AGAIN.
I doubt they will be able to remove DJT from office. Although the Senate seems to hate him more than they did WJC.
Shame on him for taking campaign funds from the poor. I hate all politicians who do. I've long dreamed of lawsuiting the Dems out of existence, starting w/ pelosi.
You have asked me to leave your sub. Maybe if you leave me alone, I will.
Or maybe make a submission to PGmods and make your complaints about a former PG sub member who you are sure is out to destroy all your fine work. After all, isn't that what you want everyone else to do with their complaints against others? If you really consider me to be such a subversive, then you owe it to the other PGers to make sure they know not to talk to, or listen to me. It would also be nice if you could let them know the list of people who if they fraternize with, could get them on your shit list. New people must be warned, help to keep them from wrongthink.
argosciv ago
Okay, I'm going to jump in here for a second on one particular subject:
JA (Julian Assange, etc).
Consider me an observer at most for all else, but something must be said. However, I'm standing as I type this, very much on the way to bed. I'm going to finish reading the above comment before bed and, if I have the energy, write/post my strictly-JA-related response.
If a follow-up/second reply isn't posted by me within, say, 20 mins of this one, I probably had to crash. In which case, I'll come back to it.
@Vindicator
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Not interested in JA, Q subs, or subjects any longer. Save your chalk for someone who will appreciate it.
When you stop making false allegations, I will stop having a problem with you.