As Q Anon frequently posts confirmation of Elite pedophile ring issues, this post is relevanrt to Pizzagate. And I know we normally quarantine Q posts on other subs in deference for the hardcore pizzagaters who doubt Q's Authenticity as a clandestine counter intelligence operation within the Trump administration
however, in regards to his bona-fides, this is the biggest Q proof yet, and it proves that Q Anon is working with US A.G. Barr, Prosecutor Durham & IG Horowitz.
On Dec 2 Q posted a watch showing the time 1:29. At precisely 1:29 on 9 Dec, all three Lawmen posted IG reports & [rebuttals 1] and 2 (https://twitter.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1204105753793089537)
it is also important to incorporate Q post 309 (which he reposted on 2 Dec 2019)
309 simply says 'Justice
but it was posted 9 Dec 2017 - a 2 year Delta
and I'll leave you autists to guess at what time of day it was posted
post script:
remembering too, that the very first Q post was on Durham's day of appointment
So:
Q first posts on Durhams 1st day of appointment, then on 9 Dec 2017 at 1:29 he says, simply ' Justice' (time and date are Mirrors 12/9 and 1:29)
precisely 2 years later, with a one week lead in reminder, Durham Barr and Horowitz make co-ordinated public addresses about draining the swamp (note the Durham announcement slipped in 4 minutes early at 1:25, for the fickle )
view the rest of the comments →
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
'clandestine counter intelligence operation' could also easily be interpreted as' re-elect DJT2020 campaign operation', couldn't it?
And that is linked to what? You haven't explained what the FISA Review has to do with pedophilia.
Do we have any submissions on FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation? I don't recall this.
Please answer my questions, I am trying to understand how this is relevant. Honestly.
MolochHunter ago
If it is contended that Q anon is an undisputed part of the Trump administration, then it stands to reason that as an unofficial policy, nodded and winked to supporters of the Trump administration via Q, that Trump A) admits pizzagate is real, and B) has an ethical responsibility to bring justice to the perpetrators
It doesnt matter whether or not it is an openly articulated 'Campaign Promise' of Trump - Trump knows that his supporters (those who follow Q at least) regard it as his acknowledged responsibility to do something about the pizzagate networks
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Your if/then statement doesn't answer my questions. I'll try again.
You say, "clandestine counter intelligence operation". I say, " re-elect DJT2020 campaign operation". Can you prove that I'm wrong?How does your scenario relate to PG?
What does the FISA Review have to do with Elite Pedophilia? Why should we believe any of it?
Do we have any submissions on FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation?
I don't think worship of politicians belongs here. NO ONE has been tried and executed, no one is in jail. All we are seeing is a regime change.
When it is PROVEN that Q is legit, AND not working against the people. THEN we should document any evidence that Q brings forward. That hasn't happened yet.
MolochHunter ago
this proves that Q is legit
just because they havent reached some arbitrary step in the process of justice that you decide, doesnt mean you get to decide on behalf of the pizzagate community not to legitimise Q posts
1) i dont have to prove youre wrong bc both propositions can be simultaneously true. they arent mutually exclusive
2) the fISA review is peripheral to elite pedophilia. But THROUGH it, we have established incontrovertible co-ordination between the DoJ and the world most widely recognised anti pizzagate/pedogate advocate known as Q anon. Why that would be bad news to anyone genuinely invested in this sub is frankly curious
3) I dont know, do we? I imagine you could find something, given the pedo porn conviction of 'star witness' George Nader
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
1} You're right, both of us can be correct. I still don't see the connection to PG. Show me clear links, please.
2) Your submission implies that the FISA Review reveals something we need to know about in PG.
I'm curious why you want me to believe you, when you clearly have no proof. HOW IS THIS CONNECTED TO ELITE PEDOPHILIA? There are many PG sub members who do not follow Q.
3) If we haven't covered OP /hurricanecrossfire then how do you know it's PG related?
It's YOUR responsibility to tell ME how your post is relevant to PG. Aren't you a mod on GA? You should have a ton of clearly written evidence at your finger tips.
MolochHunter ago
arguing that you cant post anything whatsoever about Q - the worlds most recognised anti pedogate proponent - unless the specific development it is 100% about elite pedophilia is like saying we arent allowed to post about the alleged assassination of Jenny Moore
bc murder is different to elite pedophila right?
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Okay, one more time:
You said:
I doubt Q Authenticity as a "clandestine counter intelligence operation within the Trump administration"
Please show me your proof.
You said:
How is this related to elite pedophilia? it's politics as usual. Anybody in Gitmo, yet?
You said:
Where are the connections to Elite Pedos or their arrests. Still just politics.
You said:
Where is the swamp draining, that it isn't being filled with a new batch of more of the same old shit?
No one that is a cousin of DJT has been made to pay for their crimes, not anywhere in the world. Yet we KNOW that they are guilty. Why is Q not explaining that?
Why can't you do a research post instead of trying to push something that is as easy to prove as flat-earth? Pssssh
I want Q to be true. I only see woo-woo theories. The swamp ain't draining.
MolochHunter ago
ok, one more time
Q anon could fart and it would be pizzagate related
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
He'd fart, and you'd shove your face right in it.
How come not one single Qtard can answer my questions? You do know that PG existed before Q, right?
MolochHunter ago
you get answered
you just refuse to accept the answers
so you deserve all the frustration you experience over the issue
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
You haven't answered one question.
You didn't answer my questions.
While you may think I'm frustrated, that would be a lie. I am capable of answering every question as to why I don't trust DJT, Q, DOJ, Jews, RCC, LDS, FBI, CIA, NSA, REP, DEM, FEMA and even OSHA. You have yet to explain to anyone who doesn't follow Q, why it should be believed.
I'm telling everyone that the mods of GA are incapable of answering one persons questions. EPIC.
@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @heygeorge @NOMOCHOMO @think-
MolochHunter ago
you want to bring in all the other mods to witness proof of my assertion that you simply dont accept answers given to you? knock yourself out
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Naw, I just think it's funny you won't give an honest answer to honest questions. I never denied not trusting Q. But I don't need to trust Q or you. If Q is all you say it is, then great, prove it. But if it is another psyop being played on everyone, then I think it belongs elsewhere, just like seth rich stuff.
@Vindicator, Why can't Q posts be forced to go to v/pizzagatewhatever, since it is an unproven theory? I bet this would solve all the problems. @EricKaliberhall @heygeorge @think- @gamepwn
Vindicator ago
Because that would require all submissions to v/pizzagate be only made to v/pizzagatewhatever. Just about everything we research is an unproven theory:
The answer to your question is so obvious that it casts a very dark light on your intentions regarding this subverse.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
There is proof of those points you listed. Still no proof that Q is a good guy. NONE.
Why do you keep saying that my distrust of some lying anon, on another website equals "dark intentions". Or are you saying that Q doesn't lie? Cuz I know that all them Qtards run around squealing that "disinfo is necessary". it isn't needed in PG sub. We need truth.
When Q stops lying, I'll start listening. Not before.
Why is this bad?
Vindicator ago
You: Makes a proposal that would lead to the shut down of all major lines of inquiry on v/pizzagate
Me: Notes this is a sign of dark intentions
You: Claims I said you have dark intent because you don't trust Q
Dishonesty noted
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Twist my words, and intentions all you want. I won't stop you. But I will forgive you.
Vindicator ago
"Twist my words" she says, after twisting my words.
So disappointing.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Separating Q into it's own sub has not "shut down all major lines of inquiry on PG", but you say that my and others wanting to keep an admitted source of disinformation out of PG, unless independently verified means we have "dark intentions".
When did valuing truthful sources become bad? You've known my opinion on this for a long time. Why are you always accusing me of things that aren't true?
Vindicator ago
I've never accused you of anything untrue. It's you who makes unsourced claims, not me. You are not arguing from a place of honesty and good will. Anyone reading this thread can see you dodging, weaving and deflecting. Just because you pretend you are not doing it doesn't make people blind. But let me spell it out for you:
Enty is an admitted source of disinfo. FBIAnon is an admitted source of disinfo. Wikileaks is widely believed by many goats to be a source of disinfo. Remember the much vaunted "Phase III" of Podesta emails that Assange never dropped? The cryptic chess board tweet? All major MSM cited in research here are sources of disinfo. A large portion of the work of this board is to analyze disinfo and document it. Why only whine about QAnon? A fair application of the dictatorial content curation you are pushing for would require removing ALL of these.
And that doesn't even take into consideration the fact that Q has been proven true dozens of times, despite your constant chanting otherwise.
Your continued desire to censor discussion of it from this board -- a board that was very likely created directly because of what later became known as QAnon -- is going to get you exactly nowhere with me. Not from you. Not from ES. Not from those he recruited during his consensus cracking operation. Not from that doxing piece of shit Slime. Not today. Not tomorrow. Not ever. And guess what? I don't fuck around playing games here. I've left you thugs, malcontents and manipulators no leverage points to use against me. You are stuck.
If you don't like that, I recommend you leave. You are wasting your time.
And lest you think that you will wear me down by wasting mine, you should know that every time I see another one of these QAnon attack threads it has exactly the opposite effect. The asschap fills me with joy and vindication.
On that happy note, I will leave you with Q's latest assertion:
And here's an interesting take on just who that first unsealed indictment might be, and how it's pizzagate related: https://twitter.com/SewwWhat/status/1207401612270088192 I find this plausible, given the fact Voat was hit with a three day deplatforming when we were in the middle of the Maggie Nixon photo dig.
Nahhhhh. We wouldn't want to discuss any of this on this board. No fucking way!!!!!! LMFAO
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
You and your frens accuse me of being a shill, thug, malcontent(kinda true), manipulator, GG, think-, part of ES crew, ZB crew, PV crew, WoS crew. Said I have dark intentions. The only thing you haven't accused me of is dox. I thank you for that.
You have allowed people to ask questions and argue about these in past. Why is it bad to argue Q? If you say me asking for Q to goto PGWE is overkill, fine.
No and no. Those were not my forte. Don't follow politics.
Because this is PG not GA, tGA, TA QRV, and all the other Q subs. And I never said that proven Q post didn't belong here. Just not all.
Bullshit, no evidence that DJT, Q, Assange, seth rich and all others work together.
No kidding. This is why I ask for proof.
Is that what you think, really?
What does asschap mean?
I think if that happens, it will be wonderful. What is Marker [9]? I'm not interested in someone elses take on who might be in indictment, who do you think it is?
I WANT to discuss it. The minute I say don't trust Q or DJT until a cousin gets arrested everyone asumes I'm enemy instead of person who never believes politicians.
MolochHunter ago
youre welcome to say 'dont trust Q or Trump'
no one's ever denied you that right
but you take it a step further. You want to disallow discussion of trusting Q or Trump on v/pizzagate
thats what makes you a suspicious motherfucker
i personally think Fiona Barnett is garbage
but every time soemone posts about her here, you dont see me up in the OPs face and telling mods it should be disallowed from the v/pizzagate sub , now, do you ?
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
My reaction to Q has become more vicious over the years. But in my defense, I used to read some of the drivel being posted.
Says you. I want people who trust them to show me proof they should be trusted. You know, like arresting someone.
metoo
What's your point? I'm not going to stop you from trying to determine if she is fake or not. Why haven't you?
MolochHunter ago
nice how you try to pursue the Fiona Barnett angle deeper, knowing i only raised it as a 'for instance', rather than concede your double standard on whats a permissable post here
you writhe like a worm
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Nice how you fail to answer my questions, again. You really are too low IQ. You should go back to letting @Vindicator fight your fights for you. He's better at it than you are.
MolochHunter ago
if im lazy its a function of just not really giving the first fuck what you think
howboudah ?
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
You're a bit late, You've been inconsequential to me since 2016.
¯\(ツ)/¯
MolochHunter ago
lol that kinda sounds more like ive been rent free in your head since then
were you even here back in 2016? I never noticed you