You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

doubt Q's Authenticity as a clandestine counter intelligence operation within the Trump administration

'clandestine counter intelligence operation' could also easily be interpreted as' re-elect DJT2020 campaign operation', couldn't it?

this is the biggest Q proof yet, and it proves that Q Anon is working with US A.G. Barr, Prosecutor Durham & IG Horowitz.

And that is linked to what? You haven't explained what the FISA Review has to do with pedophilia.

Do we have any submissions on FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation? I don't recall this.

Please answer my questions, I am trying to understand how this is relevant. Honestly.

MolochHunter ago

If it is contended that Q anon is an undisputed part of the Trump administration, then it stands to reason that as an unofficial policy, nodded and winked to supporters of the Trump administration via Q, that Trump A) admits pizzagate is real, and B) has an ethical responsibility to bring justice to the perpetrators

It doesnt matter whether or not it is an openly articulated 'Campaign Promise' of Trump - Trump knows that his supporters (those who follow Q at least) regard it as his acknowledged responsibility to do something about the pizzagate networks

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Your if/then statement doesn't answer my questions. I'll try again.

  1. You say, "clandestine counter intelligence operation". I say, " re-elect DJT2020 campaign operation". Can you prove that I'm wrong?How does your scenario relate to PG?

  2. What does the FISA Review have to do with Elite Pedophilia? Why should we believe any of it?

  3. Do we have any submissions on FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation?

 

I don't think worship of politicians belongs here. NO ONE has been tried and executed, no one is in jail. All we are seeing is a regime change.

When it is PROVEN that Q is legit, AND not working against the people. THEN we should document any evidence that Q brings forward. That hasn't happened yet.

MolochHunter ago

this proves that Q is legit

just because they havent reached some arbitrary step in the process of justice that you decide, doesnt mean you get to decide on behalf of the pizzagate community not to legitimise Q posts

1) i dont have to prove youre wrong bc both propositions can be simultaneously true. they arent mutually exclusive

2) the fISA review is peripheral to elite pedophilia. But THROUGH it, we have established incontrovertible co-ordination between the DoJ and the world most widely recognised anti pizzagate/pedogate advocate known as Q anon. Why that would be bad news to anyone genuinely invested in this sub is frankly curious

3) I dont know, do we? I imagine you could find something, given the pedo porn conviction of 'star witness' George Nader

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

1} You're right, both of us can be correct. I still don't see the connection to PG. Show me clear links, please.


2) Your submission implies that the FISA Review reveals something we need to know about in PG.

Why that would be bad news to anyone genuinely invested in this sub is frankly curious

I'm curious why you want me to believe you, when you clearly have no proof. HOW IS THIS CONNECTED TO ELITE PEDOPHILIA? There are many PG sub members who do not follow Q.


3) If we haven't covered OP /hurricanecrossfire then how do you know it's PG related?

I dont know, do we? I imagine you could find something, given the pedo porn conviction of 'star witness' George Nader

It's YOUR responsibility to tell ME how your post is relevant to PG. Aren't you a mod on GA? You should have a ton of clearly written evidence at your finger tips.

MolochHunter ago

arguing that you cant post anything whatsoever about Q - the worlds most recognised anti pedogate proponent - unless the specific development it is 100% about elite pedophilia is like saying we arent allowed to post about the alleged assassination of Jenny Moore

bc murder is different to elite pedophila right?

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Okay, one more time:

You said:

As Q Anon frequently posts confirmation of Elite pedophile ring issues, this post is relevanrt to Pizzagate. And I know we normally quarantine Q posts on other subs in deference for the hardcore pizzagaters who doubt Q's Authenticity as a clandestine counter intelligence operation within the Trump administration

I doubt Q Authenticity as a "clandestine counter intelligence operation within the Trump administration"

Please show me your proof.

 

You said:

however, in regards to his bona-fides, this is the biggest Q proof yet, and it proves that Q Anon is working with US A.G. Barr, Prosecutor Durham & IG Horowitz.

How is this related to elite pedophilia? it's politics as usual. Anybody in Gitmo, yet?

 

You said:

On Dec 2 Q posted a watch showing the time 1:29. At precisely 1:29 on 9 Dec, all three Lawmen posted IG reports & [rebuttals 1] and 2 (https://twitter.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1204105753793089537)

it is also important to incorporate Q post 309 (which he reposted on 2 Dec 2019)

309 simply says 'Justice

but it was posted 9 Dec 2017 - a 2 year Delta

Where are the connections to Elite Pedos or their arrests. Still just politics.

 

You said:

So:

Q first posts on Durhams 1st day of appointment, then on 9 Dec 2017 at 1:29 he says, simply ' Justice' (time and date are Mirrors 12/9 and 1:29)

precisely 2 years later, with a one week lead in reminder, Durham Barr and Horowitz make co-ordinated public addresses about draining the swamp (note the Durham announcement slipped in 4 minutes early at 1:25, for the fickle )

Where is the swamp draining, that it isn't being filled with a new batch of more of the same old shit?

No one that is a cousin of DJT has been made to pay for their crimes, not anywhere in the world. Yet we KNOW that they are guilty. Why is Q not explaining that?

Why can't you do a research post instead of trying to push something that is as easy to prove as flat-earth? Pssssh

I want Q to be true. I only see woo-woo theories. The swamp ain't draining.

MolochHunter ago

ok, one more time

Q anon could fart and it would be pizzagate related

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Q anon could fart and it would be pizzagate related

He'd fart, and you'd shove your face right in it.

Breath Deeply, Patriot.

How come not one single Qtard can answer my questions? You do know that PG existed before Q, right?

MolochHunter ago

you get answered

you just refuse to accept the answers

so you deserve all the frustration you experience over the issue

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

you get answered

You haven't answered one question.

you just refuse to accept the answers

You didn't answer my questions.

so you deserve all the frustration you experience over the issue

While you may think I'm frustrated, that would be a lie. I am capable of answering every question as to why I don't trust DJT, Q, DOJ, Jews, RCC, LDS, FBI, CIA, NSA, REP, DEM, FEMA and even OSHA. You have yet to explain to anyone who doesn't follow Q, why it should be believed.

 

I'm telling everyone that the mods of GA are incapable of answering one persons questions. EPIC.

@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @heygeorge @NOMOCHOMO @think-

MolochHunter ago

you want to bring in all the other mods to witness proof of my assertion that you simply dont accept answers given to you? knock yourself out

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Naw, I just think it's funny you won't give an honest answer to honest questions. I never denied not trusting Q. But I don't need to trust Q or you. If Q is all you say it is, then great, prove it. But if it is another psyop being played on everyone, then I think it belongs elsewhere, just like seth rich stuff.

@Vindicator, Why can't Q posts be forced to go to v/pizzagatewhatever, since it is an unproven theory? I bet this would solve all the problems. @EricKaliberhall @heygeorge @think- @gamepwn

Vindicator ago

Why can't Q posts be forced to go to v/pizzagatewhatever, since it is an unproven theory?

Because that would require all submissions to v/pizzagate be only made to v/pizzagatewhatever. Just about everything we research is an unproven theory:

  • Food code in the Podesta emails
  • Satanic beliefs of elite pedophiles driving child trafficking and sacrifice
  • Rampant pedophilia among numerous Hollywood celebrities
  • Epstein being part of Mossad
  • Child rape kompromat as a requirement to hold most positions of power in most countries and industries

The answer to your question is so obvious that it casts a very dark light on your intentions regarding this subverse.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

There is proof of those points you listed. Still no proof that Q is a good guy. NONE.

Why do you keep saying that my distrust of some lying anon, on another website equals "dark intentions". Or are you saying that Q doesn't lie? Cuz I know that all them Qtards run around squealing that "disinfo is necessary". it isn't needed in PG sub. We need truth.

When Q stops lying, I'll start listening. Not before.

Why is this bad?

Vindicator ago

You: Makes a proposal that would lead to the shut down of all major lines of inquiry on v/pizzagate

Me: Notes this is a sign of dark intentions

You: Claims I said you have dark intent because you don't trust Q

Dishonesty noted

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Twist my words, and intentions all you want. I won't stop you. But I will forgive you.

Vindicator ago

"Twist my words" she says, after twisting my words.

So disappointing.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Separating Q into it's own sub has not "shut down all major lines of inquiry on PG", but you say that my and others wanting to keep an admitted source of disinformation out of PG, unless independently verified means we have "dark intentions".

When did valuing truthful sources become bad? You've known my opinion on this for a long time. Why are you always accusing me of things that aren't true?

Vindicator ago

I've never accused you of anything untrue. It's you who makes unsourced claims, not me. You are not arguing from a place of honesty and good will. Anyone reading this thread can see you dodging, weaving and deflecting. Just because you pretend you are not doing it doesn't make people blind. But let me spell it out for you:

Enty is an admitted source of disinfo. FBIAnon is an admitted source of disinfo. Wikileaks is widely believed by many goats to be a source of disinfo. Remember the much vaunted "Phase III" of Podesta emails that Assange never dropped? The cryptic chess board tweet? All major MSM cited in research here are sources of disinfo. A large portion of the work of this board is to analyze disinfo and document it. Why only whine about QAnon? A fair application of the dictatorial content curation you are pushing for would require removing ALL of these.

And that doesn't even take into consideration the fact that Q has been proven true dozens of times, despite your constant chanting otherwise.

Your continued desire to censor discussion of it from this board -- a board that was very likely created directly because of what later became known as QAnon -- is going to get you exactly nowhere with me. Not from you. Not from ES. Not from those he recruited during his consensus cracking operation. Not from that doxing piece of shit Slime. Not today. Not tomorrow. Not ever. And guess what? I don't fuck around playing games here. I've left you thugs, malcontents and manipulators no leverage points to use against me. You are stuck.

If you don't like that, I recommend you leave. You are wasting your time.

And lest you think that you will wear me down by wasting mine, you should know that every time I see another one of these QAnon attack threads it has exactly the opposite effect. The asschap fills me with joy and vindication.

On that happy note, I will leave you with Q's latest assertion:

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 4e4d4a No.7538264 Dec 17 2019 17:03:45 (EST)

First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening.

First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction.

They will fight but you are ready.

Marker [9].

Q

And here's an interesting take on just who that first unsealed indictment might be, and how it's pizzagate related: https://twitter.com/SewwWhat/status/1207401612270088192 I find this plausible, given the fact Voat was hit with a three day deplatforming when we were in the middle of the Maggie Nixon photo dig.

Nahhhhh. We wouldn't want to discuss any of this on this board. No fucking way!!!!!! LMFAO

MolochHunter ago

Bravo my man

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

coward

Vindicator ago

Ah, the old ad hominem bludgeon and create a hostile environment tactic. So Donkey derivative. Aren't you a peach.

@MolochHunter is about as far from being a coward as you will ever find on Voat. He has real life responsibilities that would make you blush with shame at your words. I am proud to know him.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

You friend is very good at blowing

his own horn.

Your pride is noted.

Vindicator ago

Fake impeachment is DOA, or your pals would have referred it to the Senate. Q was dead right.

I'd better never see you dare to appeal to the U.S. Constitution again, since you are kekking over it's systematic perversion by those pedovores.

Not only will Q be vindicated by their inability to remove Trump from office, Americans contributed $5 million to his campaign during Pelosi's kabuki theater.