I was surprised to find such a detailed and informative article on Epstein's financial past (MSM has failed to report on this). I then noticed this message at the top:
"Editing of this article by new or unregistered users is currently disabled until October 15, 2019 at 12:19 UTC."
Does this have something to do with court proceedings? The article is worth reading. Lot's of new leads.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein
view the rest of the comments →
maurice1 ago
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2019/08/07/Florida-governor-hands-Jeffrey-Epstein-case-to-state-law-enforcement/6271565147809/
A lot of people use wikipedia as a jump off point for peer articles. Tampering with wikipedia might seem fun for some bored people, but in a case like this one, I'd leave wikipedia alone. TPTB will likely look into anyone's life, if they tamper with it.
septimasexta ago
Fact based editing and tampering are two different things. Your comment seems to suggest that my post was calling for "tampering" with the article. Obviously, that was not my intent. I was pointing out an unusual step by Wikipedia to PREVENT editing the article until a certain date. I have never seen that before. To be honest, I was surprised that they allowed so much detailed info to remain in the article.
maurice1 ago
No I didn't mean you were calling for anything.
I know idiots like to tamper with wikipedia for humor.
I also understood you was pointing out this wikipedia post to show the severity of this case.