Relevancy: The relevancy has to do with the recent report of Jeffrey Epstein wanting to impregnate women 20 at a time through in vitro fertilization. Here is one such article:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/report-epstein-openly-spoke-of-plan-to-impregnate-up-to-20-women-at-his-ranch/
Or you can go to a Voat post that goes into depth: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3361445
Virtual reality founder Jaron Lanier told the paper he was informed of Epstein’s insemination plan by a NASA scientist at one of the dinner parties. …
Still, despite his criminal past and his muddied views — and lured by the prospects of funding — many world-renowned scientists entertained his ideas, the report said.
The above lays the foundation for the assertion Epstein intended and advocated for this. There were enough witnesses solicited to be involved. What I’ve found since then is a story advanced by a finite number of individuals on Twitter and the mistress of a Russian oligarch. The mistress’ name is Nastya Rybka and she’s written a book that ties into this agenda of Epstein’s, but there’s one difference. The submission is posted to amend what appeared in the paper. In other words, I believe, based on the writings of Rybka, that Epstein fully intended to “clone” children via anyone enlisted in his aim.
In order for this to make sense, I’m first giving a short bio of the people involved.
NASTYA RYBKA
https://belsat.eu/en/news/corruption-row-belarus-born-sex-worker-exposes-link-between-russian-oligarch-and-putin-s-official/
Nastya Rybka
(real name Anastasiya Vashukevich) not only reported on Instagram (18+), but lifted the veil on Russian VIPs’ private life in her book A Story Of Seducing A Billionaire, Or A Clone For An Oligarch. According to Navalny, ‘alum king’ Oleg Deripaska and top official Sergei Prikhodko are easily recognisable in two fictional characters.
Yes, the book mentioned is the one in contention.
OLEG DERIPASKA
Deripaska is a billionaire, director of aluminium producer Rusal; Prikhodko is Deputy Prime Minister, Chief of Staff of the Government. Previously, he was an aide to Boris Yeltsin and Vladimir Putin. The video gives evidence of the duo’s taking a boat ride with the so-called good-time girls’to the coast of Norway in August 2016.
Deripaska and Rybka were repeatedly spotted going out together. On her Instagram, there are pictures of her resting on Deripaska’s yacht.
This same link provides Deripaska’s credentials and further gives credibility to her claim that she was: (1) his mistress; and (2) that she was indeed aboard his yacht. This is important and will tie in later, but in the meantime, please note that Deripaska is tied in with the Trump/Russian hoax:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/oleg-deripaska
Is Oleg Deripaska the missing link in the Trump-Russia investigation
Further, Rybka and and man called Alex Leslie were arrested in Thailand. Rybka was touted to be Mueller … yes, THAT Mueller … star witness?!!!!
https://defencereport.com/arrest-of-escort-may-aid-mueller-investigation/
Arrest of Belorussian Escort in Thailand may be key to Mueller Investigation
“Dear friends from the American press: I didn’t want to tell you much. Previously. But we’re now dealing with the situation where they are trying to “shut us down” and for a long time. Which is why I’m ready to tell about all the missing puzzle pieces you were looking for, confirm their audio and video regarding connections of our honorable deputies with Manafort, Trump, and all the hoopla around the elections in the United States. I know a lot. Which is why I’m awaiting your suggestions and waiting for you in this Thailand prison.” …
Information appeared earlier that Alex Leslie and Nastya Rybka asked for political asylum in the US embassy. We were able to speak with a New York resident and participant of Leslie’s training who was a witness to detaining Pavlo Yunko.
PAVLO YUNKO
Pavlo Yunko is a real estate agent in NY and was acting as representative for Rybka’s book.
Okay, with that out of the way, this is the tweet I saw concerning Epstein’s ‘’baby farm’’:
https://twitter.com/kelly2277/status/1156791065824944128
https://imgur.com/a/hOYZAB3
Next, we have one on sex slave books bought by Epstein and found at his property:
https://imgur.com/VxJ0Lhc
Finally, we come to several on Rybka and her book:
https://imgur.com/a/keLWVzm
Then we come to the one on cloning:
https://twitter.com/kelly2277/status/1156795291254886400
Really strange chapter in Nastya Rybka’s book about her time w Deripaska on the yacht when she overheard discussions on in vitro fertilization and cloning of Deripaska‘s children w a fertility doctor and others
Even more strange after learning about Epstein and eugenics...
Here are the four pages of the book:
https://twitter.com/kelly2277/status/1156795291254886400
1st page: https://imgur.com/cVG8YiM
2nd page: https://imgur.com/xTB5DOH
3rd page: https://imgur.com/xGoIMNL
4th page: https://imgur.com/GhD048c
Okay, so the question now becomes whether Epstein was interested in cloning. I mean, this book was ahead of the curve. Yes, if you look at the other string of tweets, they try every which way to involve our POTUS in eugenics, but Epstein is the only one where’s there’s evidence that he at least professed to impregnate 20 women at the same time. Now he couldn’t have been talking the normal way … and then there’s that talk he had on Lolita Express with Nicole Junkermann.
https://theswamp.media/the-epstein-associate-nobody-s-talking-about-the-idf-linked-bond-girl-infiltrating-the-uk-nhs
In Epstein’s planes flight manifest, a pattern which was visible from the information available is how he would use his private jet. He would use the plane for two main reasons. Most commonly he would fly himself and a number of his entourage to a destination, or alternatively he would fly people to meet him. The rarest occurrence was when Epstein would fly without any of his usual entourage and just one other passenger. There was only one name that jumped out from the flight manifest as a good example of when Epstein alternated from his routine. His second meeting with Nicole Junkermann.>
So the question becomes, what were they discussing? Why the need for such privacy? Why the deviation from the usual pattern? Well, cloning would be that sort of subject. And before anyone says Rybka is a liar … I know that. And the fact she’s still walking around alive means she’s doing somebody’s bidding for them, but still, are they trying to get ahead of the story? Control it by muddying the waters of what they might find by attaching Trump’s name to it? Remember that Junkermann is in the perfect position to help with eugenics. She was about to be in the position of being privy to NHS patient data …. Then there are the private companies she’s funded. And there is something else about this Trump involvement. Here’s one such tweet where the DNA testing on border children is mentioned:
https://twitter.com/kelly2277/status/1057724999673491456
https://imgur.com/lVTZjbL
💥BOOM💥
Trump’s obsession w immigration & birthright citizenship is far more sinister than most people realize and also explains why Trump’s administration & MAGAts supporters are rabidly foaming at the mouth to #GetErDone - the same message that was on bombs sent by Cesar Sayoc
And please read one of the tweets above again. It says:
In Nastya Rybka’s book, she talks about a fertility dr on the yacht w her and Deripaska. Allegedly, Oleg Deripaska impregnated his concubines and the children were raised and educated together in a ‘camp’
CAMP? Isn’t that what NXIVM was running? Isn’t that what a lot of these schools and camps are. But to return to the border … think about what our POTUS is doing another way as concerns this DNA testing. If children were being closed, they couldn’t just get them a passport and have identical children being flown in every hour. But they could sneak these children across the border. But if testing were done and identical matches occurred … well, no more sneaking them into California, Texas, or wherever else they were to go.
There were other posts where clones were discussed. Clones of the elite would make the perfect harvesting crop, but they would also protect the original naturally born ‘’remember Matrix?’’ human. For instance, if a murder were to occur, how would a court of law know which of the donor and clones committed the act? They couldn’t. Not unless one of them confessed which is pretty unlikely.
While I believe Rybka to be an absolute liar, there does seem to be something in there. And with all the perverse knowns we’ve all uncovered, I doubt that the pedo elite cabal getting into cloning is all that far-fetched and is this a way to put a narrative out there to control the shoe that's about to drop?
view the rest of the comments →
SurfinMindWaves ago
I think they only resort to cloning for specific bloodlines. Pumping babies into slaves to make more slaves is much easier and less expensive to do the old fashioned way.
theooeht ago
You could well be right. But what they're looking for is still a mystery. What in the genetic markers is a marker for having no soul?
And it stands to reason if your genetic make-up does not include a soul, that a clone would not have one either.
But even with the babies, they are careful as to who they choose.
SurfinMindWaves ago
I suppose the word "soul" has different meanings to different people. I don't believe you can have anything that is alive that doesn't have a soul. Just because people do evil things doesn't mean they don't have a soul, they're just evil. And even that determination is in the eye of the beholder.
theooeht ago
No doubt, but there is such a thing. In esoteric books and teachings, it's mentioned ... including the concept of being born without a soul. I guess it would most closely align with what science has learned about psychopaths. They are natural-born killers with no capacity for empathy. Sociopaths do horrendous crimes also, but they are made that way through trauma-induced shutdown of compassion, etc. I think maybe what you're getting at is that only God can distinguish what is going on inside a killer's heart or mind because sometimes a human being will commit egregious crimes ... a whole series of them ... and somewhere along the line, their conscience kicks in. The sense of regret and the realization that whoever that was was not them. It's what it means in Christianity for no sin to be too great not to be forgiven. But ''we'' have no way of telling of a person saying they regret their actions is being truthful. God is the only Supreme Being that can make such a determination. I would tend to agree with that ... that some people do change, but ....
There are also monsters.