With all due respect, you are repeating the NWO Globalist Pedo Elite Cabal narrative like a pro. None of what you say is conclusive, and if we're being honest (I am anyway), you know that this is just a foot in the door to enter phase two which begins something like: ''We let children choose their gender so why don't we let them choose who to love?'' This social experimentation is all about putting the onus on children to decide whether or not they want sex which, of course, they can't decide. And, of course, they shouldn't be allowed to decide what gender they'll be either. The fact this conversation is even coming up is harmful enough. The fact that books are being written to foster this conversation is outright abuse.

Let me state clearly that I do understand there are variables at work in human physiology. While most times, babies are born with clear definable genders, there are instances where hermaphrodites are born. Given this, I can envision a situation where the chemistry or brain functioning is at odds with gender. And, further, even if this is not the case, if an adult, for whatever reason, wants to proceed down the transgender path, I have no objection to them doing so. It's their life and they get to decide what to do with it. However, the introduction and grooming of a Gender Identity issue is tantamount to child abuse. In my opinion, what the Satanist Angelina Jolie did to her daughter Shiloh is and was actionable child abuse. The fact the child was missing a front tooth at three is worrisome, but reading about how Jolie hated her daughter sends chills down my spine. Then we get to African adoptions where crazy PedoWood celebrities are adopting children considered orphans when orphans has now been determined to be defined as maybe possibly having one biological parent. Yet another bizarre misinterpretation of a pretty simple word. But the question is why the always adopt the transgender one? With a percentage that is low, it seems every single time a PedoWood crazy celebrity adopts a child, they end up identifying with the sex other than the one they were bestowed with biologically.

As for hormone blockers and my mention of the age of four, I was being snarky and sarcastic, but sarcastic because that is the age that children are nor enrolled for ''transgender camp''? Can the idiocy become more disturbing? But I am not far off the mark because in this article:

https://thefederalist.com/2018/12/14/puberty-blockers-clear-danger-childrens-health/

The first claim is that Lupron is safe. But thousands of patients who have been treated with Lupron for non-sex-related conditions would disagree.

Lupron was originally Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved to treat prostate cancer, but it’s now routinely prescribed for other conditions such as endometriosis and “precocious puberty” — i.e., puberty that begins too early (generally considered under age eight for girls, under age nine for boys).

To paraphrase, if ''precocious puberty'' begins before eight, girls are routinely given Lupron. The age before eight is seven, so we can deduce with certainty that girls are being given a hormone blocker at least by the age of seven. We can speculate that it's even earlier, but since it does not precisely state that, we will go with seven for girls and eight for boys. These are outrageous ages to be giving anything. But what are the physical effects and ramifications of these drugs? From the link given:

Many of these patients have experienced extreme side effects that shattered their health and their lives, including severe joint pain, osteoporosis, compromised immune systems, and mental health issues such as severe depression and even suicidal ideation. The FDA has received 24,000 reports of adverse reactions, about half of which the agency has deemed serious.

Lupron manufacturer AbbVie has been fighting lawsuits over the drug for years. In one case pending in federal court in Illinois, 60-year-old Terry Paulsen claims she has endured severe medical problems related to receiving two injections of Lupron for endometriosis 14 years ago. “My body is on fire,” she said. “My joints have arthritis everywhere.” Since her Lupron treatment, Paulsen has suffered not only constant pain but strange rashes, severe osteoporosis, and multiple surgeries.

In another lawsuit, gynecologist David Redwine testified as an expert witness about the adverse effects of Lupron he has observed over 31 years of medical practice. Noting that Lupron’s suppression of the pituitary-gonadal system may affect a body’s immune response, Redwine concluded that the plaintiff in that case suffered extreme bone density loss and other symptoms as a result of being administered Lupron beginning at the age of 17.

Many Patients Suffer From Lupron-Related Side Effects

Tragically, many other young patients have endured similar adverse effects. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported on a younger patient’s trauma after receiving Lupron treatment for precocious puberty. Now 22, Brooklyn Harbin was injected with Lupron at the age of 10, and soon found herself in such severe pain that she ended up a wheelchair while still in fifth grade.

Dr. Ken Sinervo, an Atlanta-area gynecologist who specializes in endometriosis surgery, reports having seen many women suffering memory loss and joint pain after Lupron treatment. He was quoted as warning that “Lupron or any of the similar types of medications should never be used in someone under the age of 21.”

But of course, all gender dysphoric patients who might be placed on Lupron to delay puberty are years younger than 21. Plus, there’s a serious added danger to using Lupron merely to stop normal puberty in a gender dysphoric child. Such treatment is “off label,” meaning the FDA hasn’t approved the drug for this purpose, nor is there reliable research showing the safety of such use.

The research and consulting firm Hayes, Inc. warned that “the literature is too sparse and the studies [that exist are] too limited to suggest conclusions” about safety and effectiveness of using Lupron and other GnRH agonists on healthy children to prevent normal puberty. The American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) points out that puberty blockers alter a patient’s body in myriad ways:

In addition to preventing the development of secondary sex characteristics, GnRH agonists arrest bone growth, decrease bone accretion, prevent the sex-steroid dependent organization and maturation of the adolescent brain, and inhibit fertility by preventing the development of gonadal tissue and mature gametes for the duration of treatment.

Here is another reasoned approach -- one that identifies the problem which is that the child absorbs the burden and the pressure:

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Transgender-Kids-Eligible-for-Earlier-Medical-Intervention-Under-New-Guidelines-423082734.html

“I think it’s putting a lot on the shoulders of these children,” said Dr. Eric Vilain, a pediatrician and geneticist who heads the Medical Genetics division at UCLA. “It’s putting them on a path that will have a lot of medical and surgical consequences.”

Vilain believes early social transitions unfairly push children to thinking they should identity as the opposite sex. He said these transitions can lead to unnecessary medical interventions for transgender kids.

“People telling me that these boys who behave like girls are in fact girl inside -- I’m saying well, where is the girl?” he asked. “Is their brain different? Are their other genes different? I still have not seen that.”

According to Vilain, physicians are far too willing to recommend social transitions for children. As a result, Vilain believes the vast majority of children currently undergoing social transitions in the U.S. might not actually be transgender and, thus, might not be best served by embracing a sex that doesn't match their gender.

"If the children are pushed in this belief it will be much much harder for them to get out of this belief because everyone will have agreed on it very, very early on," Vilain said. "What worries me is that, indeed, there might be in the upcoming years a considerable number of these children that are placed on a path that we don’t fully know the outcome."

Beyond this, I'm very word of this LGBTQ mafia that has developed and bullying all other voices. This burgeoning growth of this mob is becoming not only troublesome, but scary in its influence to shut down diverse opinion. As an early supporter of the movement way back when, I advocated and voted for people of the same sex to marry. Again, I was hooked by the baited line of people have the right to choose who to love. I absolutely believed that and discounted the wise counsel that promised it was a Pandora's box. I thought the notion ridiculous and, oh, how wrong I was! Now we have MEN./ BOYS allowed in women's bathrooms ... in little girl's locker rooms based on a man/boy identifying as a woman/girl not wanting to be in a male locker room, but there is no weight given to women/girls who do not want a pair of male genitals in their face. Then we have the lovely transgender males being allowed to compete in women's sports? Really? Why do you suppose men and women's sports have been kept separate all these years? And when anyone says anything, the freight train is just sent down the hill with hysterical glee. Mario Lopez states a not disrespectful opinion of what is going on and he's made to apologize and threatened with the loss of his job? And last, but not least, we have the ''scholarly'' opinion that there are 15 genders? STOP!

I feel I've been lied to and used. I feel the real agenda is not what it seems. The real agenda is legalizing child molestation and I will not go down that road.