Two days ago, the Guardian published this article: Finally, Prince Andrew has found his perfect role – Trump’s escort

Finally the answer to the question never asked on University Challenge: “What is Prince Andrew for?” Even the finest moral philosopher would stumble on this one. Now we know: the prince of naff is to keep the US president away from “political conversations” by talking to him about golf. Yes, really: Andrew will accompany Trump on two of the three days of his British trip.

..Still, Andrew will have a lot to chat about with Trump besides golf. They met 20 years ago at Mar-a-Lago through their former friend, Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender accused of abusing dozens of underage girls. In a court statement, Epstein’s former handyman alleged that Andrew used to attend pool parties full of adolescent girls, staying in guest rooms with soap in the shape of genitalia. Classy.

After Epstein got out of prison, Andrew was seen strolling with him in New York, shortly after which Fergie accepted £15,000 from Epstein to clear her debts. This was put down, as everything is, to an error of judgment on the Duchess of York’s part.

Andrew, it was thought, was no longer such a great ambassador as he hung out with Muammar Gaddafi’s son Saif and various oligarchs. Meanwhile, there was much speculation after his “South York” mansion, which had been on the market for five years, was suddenly snapped up for £15m – £3m above the asking price – by an offshore fund in the Virgin Islands.

So there is golf, “deals” and a lot else to discuss. This puke-inducing diplomacy is surely what Andrew was born to do. This is the new “normal”.

Soo, why was the Guardian referring back to that property deal that happened back in 2008/2009? The fall of the house of York: Why has the mansion sold by Duke in mystery £15m deal gone to ruin?

..Last night, Channel 4's Dispatches programme raised questions over the property deal, which was made by a trust acting on behalf of the prince and overseen by Sir Alan Reid, the Keeper of the Privy Purse, who is the Queen's chief accountant, and a representative from Farrers, the Queen's lawyers. ..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Reid_(courtier)

In October 2015 [Reid] acted to prevent the cancellation and annulment of Hubert Chesshyre's honour (Commander of the Royal Victorian Order)[5] following a public hearing - the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse[6]. The justification given was Chesshyre had not been convicted and had received an absolute discharge (due to being unfit to plead) - despite the offence being proved in a trial of the facts. This action was later overruled following intervention by the victim's MP and the Prime Minister.

In March 2019, Honours system under scrutiny after sex abuser kept title for years

Lawyers have called for an overhaul of the honours forfeiture system after it emerged that a sex abuser retained an honour bestowed for services to the Queen some three years after a court recognised him as a paedophile.

..Hubert Chesshyre, 78, an expert on heraldry and genealogy, held a number of senior positions within the royal household, rising to become secretary of the most noble order of the garter, the highest order in British chivalry. Among the many honours bestowed upon him over more than 40 years were the Queen’s Silver and Golden Jubilee Medals, and the commander of the Royal Victorian Order (CVO) – the latter for distinguished personal service to the monarch. A fellow or member of several illustrious organisations and charities, he was a heraldic consultant to the likes of Sir Paul McCartney, Lord Sugar and Sir Terry Pratchett.

But it recently emerged during the Independent Inquiry Into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) that in 2015 Chesshyre was found to have sexually abused a teenage chorister during the 1990s, a fact that has remained buried from public record. This is because Chesshyre’s case did not result in a criminal conviction. Rather, the inquiry heard “he was found to have committed the acts in question” in a trial of the facts.

..The fact that Chesshyre’s name was misspelled throughout the trial, despite repeated police efforts to have it corrected, has made it difficult to identify him in legal databases.

His victim told the Observer that he believed there may have been others. “I know of other boys from the choir where their parents became concerned and stopped Mr Chesshyre from having anything more to do with them.” Chesshyre’s case is similar to that of Lord Janner, who was also accused of sexual abuse. Suffering from dementia, Janner was due to undergo a similar trial of the facts but this was dropped after his death in 2015.

Maybe Trump wants to discuss Andrew's links with Santa Fe Relocation and therefore, the Hampstead case? Ahem, mentioned in this comment here https://voat.co/v/pizzagatewhatever/3247516/18889217/10 and also in this post : Data Dump for Eastman Kodak, Lucent Technologies, RFID, the Crowley Company and the Occult which also highlights connections with Kushner and the Bronfmans, ahem...

Bonus video: Why Trump Meeting With The Royal Family Is Worse Than You Think!