You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

think- ago

Gillibrand tries to smear the name of Christ and call Him a MURDERER.

She doesn't call Jesus a murderer.

You do not present a source for your claim, which you need to do in order to adhere to Rule 2.

Vindicator ago

It was pretty clear this was septima's editorialization about the implications of her statements, rather than a literal claim she said this word for word. He used the word "tries".

But I think it would be a stronger, less click-baity post, @septimasexta, if you explained that her claim is diabolical because it puts Jesus in the position of endorsing the killing of the unborn, which is blasphemous.

think- ago

It was pretty clear this was septima's editorialization about the implications of her statements, rather than a literal claim she said this word for word. He used the word "tries".

No, imo it wasn't. The old version of the OP gave the impression that she said something like this.

septimasexta ago

Done.

septimasexta ago

I did not use quotes. It is implied in her statements. Currently, in the state of Georgia, it is illegal to abort an unborn child that has a heartbeat. The state has declared this to be the beginning of personhood, protected under the State Constitution. Planning to kill this person by abortion is therefore murder. The definition of Christian is one who follows CHRIST. Hence the name. Included in her above quote is the new Georgia "heartbeat" LAW. IN GEORGIA, AN UNBORN CHILD WITH A HEARTBEAT is fully HUMAN and is protected from murder. Christ upheld the Ten Commandments, one of which is "Thou shalt not murder." Christ takes it even further: if you plan the deed in your MIND, it is the same as having committed it.

think- ago

That's your interpretation. But in your OP, you give the impression it is a quote.

You'd need to add a phrase like 'imo, this means.......', then it'll be fine.

septimasexta ago

Done. Again.

think- ago

Thanks. New OP is much better.