You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@thewebofslime, thanks for creating a well-written, easy to follow explanation. Unfortunately, I have to flair this for Rule 2 because you have no actual primary souces linked here at all. The pics are great and make it easy to read, but we also need the original source links so that people can vet your thesis for themselves. Please take the time to add that material so that we can leave this up. I will give you the 24 Hours Grace flair. Of course, if you may always post it as is to v/pizzagatewhatever, which does not have evidentiary requirements. Thanks.

thewebofslime ago

All of the business documents are "self-authenticating" in that they are good enough for court and meet the evidentiary requirements for courts within the US.

Voat seemingly has some of the sources banned, so it has become increasingly difficult to write a long post and include a bunch of links, then have the post rejected. Because, frankly, I don't have time to go hunt through every single link, again. I generally do go to the trouble, when writing, to include enough of the names so that anything can be Googled.

The Edible Schoolyard tax returns from 2013, as well as others, are easily Googled.

The Joule Docs email by Erynn Sepp is easily Googled, but the Uranium One money trail is best explored, in detail, in my other posts.

The Troika Laundromat is widely reported on. No news article will mention Joule, Troika Dialog, Ruben Vardanyan, Ian Telfer and the Clinton Foundation all in the same article. It doesn't exist. This is why you have to rely on the primary source documents.

Other than that, judicial notice should be recognized for the Russia reset and it is beyond the scope of a single thread to chase down and link every single donor to the Clinton Foundation who also donated to Skolkovo. The Joule Docs email proves the last picture and Ian Telfer's payment from his NGO to the Clinton Foundation are widely recognized by all MSM, but there is not going to be a single article you can find that also shows he gave to the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Partnership. That is why it is important people do their own research.

I'm not sure what else needs proving or sources. Most of it is pretty obvious and well known and reported upon.

Here are some of the sources, but... again... I can't actually include them in the post because "banned domains." I played around with it, to try to find which was correct, but there is clearly more than one.

https://i.imgur.com/FRrOvyq.png

think- ago

I generally do go to the trouble, when writing, to include enough of the names so that anything can be Googled.

The Edible Schoolyard tax returns from 2013, as well as others, are easily Googled.

I really appreciate your posts, @thewebofslime. But I'm afraid the rules we have are here for a reason - and that's that posts should be self-explanatory, and backed up with sources.

I really can't wrap my head around why you are able to write brilliant posts, but are not able to adhere to the subverse rules. Sorry for being so blunt.

Maybe reduce the number of posts, and focus on writing the ones you submit in a way that they don't need to be flaired?

thewebofslime ago

I get it, and the deletion, itself, isn't a problem. I haven't complained in the two years /v/Pizzagate has been around. But I am sure that the standards aren't always equally applied.

I'm not going to have people telling me I am lazy and acting like their time is more valuable than mine, though. When I'm insulted, I speak up. I treat pathological narcissists with extreme prejudice, and anyone who thinks their time is more valuable than mine without knowing anything about me, and who doesn't have the intellectual capacity to gauge the quality of my work, fits this description. @Crensch.

I have no problem sourcing stuff, but the application of the rules is widely varied and the rules are specific enough to silence actual debate and progress. The low effort posts take over against high effort posting and the recommendation for great work that needs to be discussed is, "Oh, well go post in the tiniest subverse that everyone ignores."

If everyone who was serious about /v/Pizzagate actually reported pedophiles who were discovered to LEO and reported the nonprofits to the IRS, this problem would have been solved ages ago. As far as I can tell, I am the only one who is actually DOING SOMETHING.

I would suggest that the rules of the sub do not always allow for "conversation" in a productive manner and I can see when good posts are buried, not by downvoting campaigns, but by upvoting campaigns of competing posts.

I have been very interested in measuring how shilling works and the Pizzagate sub has seen every kind. This whole sub, whether the mods intend to, or not, is operating as limited hangout. It is unfocused and lacks a clear direction.

The problem is compounded when searchvoat doesn't work 99% of the time for many people. This is all a systematic way to BURY information. I don't really see people from this sub branching out. QRV is doing way more work, gets way more attention and exposure and more than half their community didn't even believe in Pizzagate.

I've slowly, but surely, been working on a way to have a place for everyone to type in a name and pull up all Pizzagate/Pedogate related material. It's almost done. It will be more focused than a Google search and will help people clearly lay out evidence. But what is the point of letting everyone do that if no one actually reports pedophiles and their money laundering? I'm not convinced that the /v/Pizzagate community is the place to share such a tool.

So, while my post generates a lot of bitching and extra work for me, the truth is that it is a small piece of the puzzle. This is what I was REALLY working on. It is the most comprehensive explanation of Pizzagate that you will find. It surpasses anything anyone has been allowed to post to /v/Pizzagate. The sourcing involves a lot of grainy FOIA documents that is greater than the length of the piece, itself.

https:// docs.google.com/document/d/1InQCLcOWn0iv6iJxqyBIzSQmxVmwjW9xs_LY8yjw0HY/edit?usp=sharing

Now, as a way to HELP PEOPLE UNDERSTAND, it is great and work like this shouldn't have to be meticulously sourced because that really should be an entirely separate document. Plus, a lot of my methods and writing are my intellectual property and I am doing your community and others a favor by sharing everything I do with zero compensation.

So, my post, while you don't like the sourcing, is providing a way for people to understand the complexity of the monetary finagling behind the scenes of organized crime.

So, I challenge you all to actually think about why this work isn't allowed on your subreddit and reflect on why I see a problem with that. I haven't read any of the other replies, because I have hundreds of messages/replies in multiple inboxes across multiple platforms every single day, where people aren't giving me a hard time about my posts. Even if I wasn't busy, it literally isn't feasible for me to reply to everyone.

@kingkongwaswrong [O] @Crensch [O] @Vindicator [M] @srayzie [M] @ben_matlock [M] @EricKaliberhall [J] @heygeorge [D]

also

@shewhomustbeobeyed

Because I think she might be interested in reading the Google doc before the whole sourced version goes on my website.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

I'm reading the doc. Thank you.

Please try to find a way to comply with the rules. I know they're tough and time consuming, but they are in place for good reasons.

I hope you find a way to resolve this. Please post to /pizzagatewhatever if you don't have the needed links.

I enjoy reading you.

Thank you.

thewebofslime ago

My problem is that it will never fit and I think long giant posts are necessary to explain the entirety of the problem. This last post was merely a piece of a much larger work, which is a chopped down version of a much larger work.

I can use fake AI (markovian chains) to write rough drafts of articles. This is usually what sets my chronology. If I put in all my sources from a spreadsheet, it creates a wonderful rough draft that merely needs to be reworded, because it looks like an idiot wrote it. The outline will usually be pretty good, though. So, when I output a 100,000 character article, it takes me less time and effort than when other people do it. A lot less.

https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/b2c8fy/did_ai_write_the_manifesto/

When I generate something, it automatically posts to multiple platforms. I generally don't have time to tailor everything to places with extra rules. So, if it gets deleted, I'm not too worried about it. I get worried when I see artificial manipulation surrounding my post, then get insulted over being lazy and wasting everyone's time, when, in fact, it is my time that is being wasted because everywhere else that wants this type of content welcomes it with open arms. /v/Pizzagate has NEVER been kind to my posting. I mean going all the way back to over two years ago. I would say it has gotten better. But, the subverse will never allow a single, comprehensive article to be written on Pizzagate because you can't cover it in 10,000 characters, nor can you source it in 10,000 characters.

It is the same reason why you will never get to the bottom of anything on Twitter. Everyone is dumbed down to trying to communicate in one sentence. Crimes that are intentionally organized in a layered, complex manner are impossible to explain in this format.

I see it as a serious problem that good posts can get deleted when low effort posts that really contribute nothing are constantly filling the front page. What is everyone really trying to accomplish? I'm left wondering.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

You do so much work on these articles, I hate to see them deleted while drivel stays up. Do you post the same submissions in your other sub v/thewebofslime?

If you wish to keep submitting to v/pizzagate and would like me to assist you in any way, please let me know. I could archive articles for you so when you posted them in your submissions they would take up less space, and help you meet this subs rules.

I do not know how other places like reddit are run and I've never had a twitter account. But there are a few people here who have shared there twit links and you are one of the few who I will actually go read once in a while.


What is everyone really trying to accomplish?

I have no tech skills so I use the submissions and articles to help people in my real world to red pill others and spread the word. I make the archives for this purpose, and so the government won't have such an easy time sweeping it under the rug again.

I don't think I could take that.