I’m not as caught up on pizzagate as most of you. Did you guys know that the Comet Ping Ping shooting was posted about before it happened? I don’t know if that’s true. But, it’s in the dump.
Timestamps on Google search returns are usually 6 to 8 hours off from UTC time when the engine kicks them back on a query (a well known bug for articles which are immediately posted)
Whats interesting in the graphic shown is that the timestamps dont line up with the time of the incident even accounting for the bug in the UTC timing - having an article showing "posted 20 hours ago" in a screenshot at 7pm, when the incident happened that day at 3pm lends itself to the theory that either A. The results are fucked with and the graphic is fraudulent, or B the articles in question themselves were posted before the incident they were reporting took place.
I love pages that include the date in the URL, ala..."website_com/articles/03-16-2019/blabla..." because then you can correlate that date with the Google cache date and content shown. And I always caution people to ignore any arguments about failings of the Google cache system. For God's sake, ALL that Google does is cache web pages! It's not like they're a chip manufacturer and web page caching isn't their expertise.
view the rest of the comments →
srayzie ago
I’m not as caught up on pizzagate as most of you. Did you guys know that the Comet Ping Ping shooting was posted about before it happened? I don’t know if that’s true. But, it’s in the dump.
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/8d7f91c36a5f76fa8373d8f263c31ceae0ac68b2ebca61b18ab2e9cf8ab618e5.jpg
@Vindicator @Think- @Blacksmith21
Vindicator ago
This is a very confusing graphic. Which article(s) were published before the shooting? @The1stLantern.
The1stLantern ago
@vindicator
Timestamps on Google search returns are usually 6 to 8 hours off from UTC time when the engine kicks them back on a query (a well known bug for articles which are immediately posted)
Whats interesting in the graphic shown is that the timestamps dont line up with the time of the incident even accounting for the bug in the UTC timing - having an article showing "posted 20 hours ago" in a screenshot at 7pm, when the incident happened that day at 3pm lends itself to the theory that either A. The results are fucked with and the graphic is fraudulent, or B the articles in question themselves were posted before the incident they were reporting took place.
Tyranny-News-Network ago
I love pages that include the date in the URL, ala..."website_com/articles/03-16-2019/blabla..." because then you can correlate that date with the Google cache date and content shown. And I always caution people to ignore any arguments about failings of the Google cache system. For God's sake, ALL that Google does is cache web pages! It's not like they're a chip manufacturer and web page caching isn't their expertise.