Fiona keeps being proven right, with evidence. Her detractors can only make ad hominem attacks, since they have no evidence to support their own claims.
Follow V4CR insider Lorelei Hoyt, the private investigator who ACTUALLY did the sting operations for Sawyer. She also posts evidence. The Sawyers have never addressed any of these claims.
https://twitter.com/loreleihoyt/status/1079111136254009344
Why does Craig Sawyer say he has maintained a TOP SECRET clearance and is running covert Tier One operations? Why haven't they arrested a single sex trafficker, or released any documentary footage? Jenny Moore was found dead 3 days after calling him out on Twitter
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7MEYS5UW3IgZ/
No kids rescued. No child traffickers arrested. No documentary. $100,000 from Alex Jones and at least half a million from the public. Evidence that money is being syphoned (embezzled?) from both the charity and the film production company. Why are people on this forum not concerned by that, but deeply concerned that the Barnett family owned a house with a piano in it?
No one asking questions on this board is making ad hominem attacks. Please show me where that is happening.
The Barnett post you cite about Sawyer was impossible to vet because all she included for evidence was thumbnails too small and too low resolution to examine. The entire second paragraph was completely deceptive:
Well, I finally obtained the irrefutable evidence of Sawyer’s fraudulent and highly lucrative child advocacy business. Multiple former V4CR staff have blown the whistle on Sawyer’s crimes. And I mean crimes. Sawyer is only licensed to gather donations to his not-for-profit in 5 USA states. Yet he collects moneys from multiple states in which he is unregistered, and in which he is legally mandated to register. His latest target was Idaho.
This looks like a smear to me.
I don't know whether Sawyer is good or bad, but I do know a little bit about taxes. V4CR is (PDF) a registered 501c3, that has filed Form 990 and disclosed it's funds. Barnett appears to be claiming this is fake -- despite the fact 4VCR is subject to IRS review and is in good standing with the IRS.
Barnett is implying he is illegally collecting contributions, despite the fact that V4CR warns potential donors right on their site they are not yet registered in every state.
According to this article, not all states require it AND it is an extremely labor intensive and time consuming process for those who do.
Charitable nonprofits frequently think they need to register to solicit donations in all 50 states. Fortunately, not all states require this. The number of states that do require charitable solicitation registration varies in some circumstances (e.g., depending on the type of organization)...Currently, 37 states and D.C. broadly require charitable solicitation registration and renewal, unless a specific exemption applies.
There are 9 states that do not require charitable registration: Delaware, Iowa, Idaho, Indiana, Montana, Nebraska, South Dakota, Vermont & Wyoming. Texas has limited registration requirements that are only applicable to law enforcement, public safety and veterans organizations. Arizona requires charitable veterans organizations to register if they are soliciting money or other support in the state. Finally, Louisiana only requires registration if a charity engages paid, professional solicitors to fundraise in their state, while Missouri exempts 501c3, 501c7 and 501c8 organizations, upon application.
The charity is quite new and only collected $552,004 last year. Seems a bit unfair to expect them to have been able to complete that exhaustive process already, let alone claim this is "irrefutable evidence of Sawyer’s fraudulent and highly lucrative" "crimes".
That is not an honest assessment based on evidence. This should raise major red flags for anyone genuinely interested in the truth about all these characters.
Note the V4CR public financial statement (IRS Form 990 for 2017) confirms the payments coming out of the charity, disguised as "security consulting"
"Disguised"? Doesn't V4CR set up pedo stings and then go in with local law enforcement and highly trained veteran volunteers to apprehend the perpetrators and rescue the kids? Are you actually telling me to you think that can happen for free?
Follow V4CR insider Lorelei Hoyt, the private investigator who ACTUALLY did the sting operations for Sawyer. She also posts evidence. The Sawyers have never addressed any of these claims. https://twitter.com/loreleihoyt/status/1079111136254009344
I've never heard of this person, so if you want to bring this in, you should explain who she is, what her history is, and support whatever claims she is making with evidence. The tweet you linked only says he wasn't present at one of the V4CR operations, but my understanding is the guy is the head of the organization and has used his various connections and reputation to bring law enforcement, volunteer specialists and others together to run pedo stings. That kind of CEO-type activity generally precludes being a hands on part of every single activity an organization is involved in. Pretty weak sauce to accuse the guy of fraud.
Why does Craig Sawyer say he has maintained a TOP SECRET clearance and is running covert Tier One operations?
Maybe he is? Why is this a problem? He's a decorated veteran of this country's most elite tactical warfare unit. Is there any evidence he served in any dishonorable way?
Why haven't they arrested a single sex trafficker, or released any documentary footage?
So now you're trying to imply that Sawyer killed Moore because she tweeted that he had blocked her on Twitter after she told him he was a distraction because she didn't think he was going after elite pedophiles? Wow. Sawyer killed Jenny Moore, huh? That's what you're going with. With zero evidence, OF COURSE.
How can you people look yourself in the mirror? In what universe does an accusation like this do anything but add to the mounting pile of evidence that Barnett is indeed running an army of trolls to attack people who are fighting pedophiles? Goddamn.
How can you people look yourself in the mirror? In what universe does an accusation like this do anything but add to the mounting pile of evidence that Barnett is indeed running an army of trolls to attack people who are fighting pedophiles? Goddamn.
That's the problem with most of these people who publicly put themselves out there as investigators, victims or researchers. A lot of them are just slinging shit at each other over perceived slights all the while while claiming to be working towards stopping child abuse. I have a very hard time putting a lot of stock in people who seem to value their own ego over a goal that they all claim to share. It's really quite shameful behavior and all it accomplishes is rallying one person's followers against another and sows chaos and dissent across the board as we can clearly see happening here. It's very frustrating watching this happen time and time again as narcissists joust over who should be regarded as the penultimate authority on the subject. A subject that happens to have many different facets to it that intersect in some ways and not in others. So many of them seem to be blinded to this fact and so they are insistent that their particular battleground is the only real fight and everyone that doesn't agree is an imbecile. It's so fucking stupid. That's not even taking into account all of the trolls and groups that are actively trying to muddy the water and cover shit up. Everyone involved in these constant spats should be fucking ashamed of themselves for engaging in this behavior.
view the rest of the comments →
Piscina ago
Just so that people know what Fiona is responding to: : https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3016570
Vindicator ago
Fiona was definitely the aggressor. Here is her October attack on a whole group of people trying to help kids: https://fionabarnett.org/2018/10/06/deep-state-shills-dropping-like-flies/.
kingzos ago
Fiona keeps being proven right, with evidence. Her detractors can only make ad hominem attacks, since they have no evidence to support their own claims.
Here is her post proving that Craig Sawyer was pulling money from both his charity and the production company through kickbacks. Note the V4CR public financial statement (IRS Form 990 for 2017) confirms the payments coming out of the charity, disguised as "security consulting" https://fionabarnett.org/2018/12/12/shocking-evidence-craig-sawyer-defrauded-v4cr-of-11k-per-month
Follow V4CR insider Lorelei Hoyt, the private investigator who ACTUALLY did the sting operations for Sawyer. She also posts evidence. The Sawyers have never addressed any of these claims. https://twitter.com/loreleihoyt/status/1079111136254009344
Why does Craig Sawyer say he has maintained a TOP SECRET clearance and is running covert Tier One operations? Why haven't they arrested a single sex trafficker, or released any documentary footage? Jenny Moore was found dead 3 days after calling him out on Twitter https://www.bitchute.com/video/7MEYS5UW3IgZ/
No kids rescued. No child traffickers arrested. No documentary. $100,000 from Alex Jones and at least half a million from the public. Evidence that money is being syphoned (embezzled?) from both the charity and the film production company. Why are people on this forum not concerned by that, but deeply concerned that the Barnett family owned a house with a piano in it?
Vindicator ago
No one asking questions on this board is making ad hominem attacks. Please show me where that is happening.
The Barnett post you cite about Sawyer was impossible to vet because all she included for evidence was thumbnails too small and too low resolution to examine. The entire second paragraph was completely deceptive:
This looks like a smear to me.
I don't know whether Sawyer is good or bad, but I do know a little bit about taxes. V4CR is (PDF) a registered 501c3, that has filed Form 990 and disclosed it's funds. Barnett appears to be claiming this is fake -- despite the fact 4VCR is subject to IRS review and is in good standing with the IRS.
Barnett is implying he is illegally collecting contributions, despite the fact that V4CR warns potential donors right on their site they are not yet registered in every state.
According to this article, not all states require it AND it is an extremely labor intensive and time consuming process for those who do.
The charity is quite new and only collected $552,004 last year. Seems a bit unfair to expect them to have been able to complete that exhaustive process already, let alone claim this is "irrefutable evidence of Sawyer’s fraudulent and highly lucrative" "crimes".
That is not an honest assessment based on evidence. This should raise major red flags for anyone genuinely interested in the truth about all these characters.
More info on charities: https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/charitable-solicitation-state-requirements
"Disguised"? Doesn't V4CR set up pedo stings and then go in with local law enforcement and highly trained veteran volunteers to apprehend the perpetrators and rescue the kids? Are you actually telling me to you think that can happen for free?
I've never heard of this person, so if you want to bring this in, you should explain who she is, what her history is, and support whatever claims she is making with evidence. The tweet you linked only says he wasn't present at one of the V4CR operations, but my understanding is the guy is the head of the organization and has used his various connections and reputation to bring law enforcement, volunteer specialists and others together to run pedo stings. That kind of CEO-type activity generally precludes being a hands on part of every single activity an organization is involved in. Pretty weak sauce to accuse the guy of fraud.
Maybe he is? Why is this a problem? He's a decorated veteran of this country's most elite tactical warfare unit. Is there any evidence he served in any dishonorable way?
They have:
So now you're trying to imply that Sawyer killed Moore because she tweeted that he had blocked her on Twitter after she told him he was a distraction because she didn't think he was going after elite pedophiles? Wow. Sawyer killed Jenny Moore, huh? That's what you're going with. With zero evidence, OF COURSE.
How can you people look yourself in the mirror? In what universe does an accusation like this do anything but add to the mounting pile of evidence that Barnett is indeed running an army of trolls to attack people who are fighting pedophiles? Goddamn.
@think- @Crensch @New4now @Sandhog
SandHog ago
That's the problem with most of these people who publicly put themselves out there as investigators, victims or researchers. A lot of them are just slinging shit at each other over perceived slights all the while while claiming to be working towards stopping child abuse. I have a very hard time putting a lot of stock in people who seem to value their own ego over a goal that they all claim to share. It's really quite shameful behavior and all it accomplishes is rallying one person's followers against another and sows chaos and dissent across the board as we can clearly see happening here. It's very frustrating watching this happen time and time again as narcissists joust over who should be regarded as the penultimate authority on the subject. A subject that happens to have many different facets to it that intersect in some ways and not in others. So many of them seem to be blinded to this fact and so they are insistent that their particular battleground is the only real fight and everyone that doesn't agree is an imbecile. It's so fucking stupid. That's not even taking into account all of the trolls and groups that are actively trying to muddy the water and cover shit up. Everyone involved in these constant spats should be fucking ashamed of themselves for engaging in this behavior.